AFOSI Special Agent study plan
AFOSI Special Agent · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Criminal Investigation and Evidence Handling
Map the evidence lifecycle from scene/consent search through seizure, chain-of-custody documentation, storage, and release, and write a one-page flow diagram from memory
Distinguish legal standards of proof (reasonable suspicion, probable cause, preponderance) and match each to the investigative action it authorizes
Compare search-authority tools (warrant, consent, exigency, incident to arrest, plain view) and list two failure modes for each
Practice drafting a chain-of-custody entry and an evidence-receipt log with no gaps in time, person, or location
Your checkpoint
A completed evidence-handling reference sheet with a lifecycle diagram and a 10-row sample chain-of-custody log scored against a self-made checklist
Criminal Investigation and Evidence Handling & Federal Criminal Law and Procedure
Apply Fourth Amendment search-and-seizure rules to three fact patterns and justify each conclusion in writing
Explain the exclusionary rule, its exceptions, and how tainted evidence can be purged
Outline the elements of the most-tested federal offenses (theft of government property, false statements, bribery, wire fraud) and identify what evidence proves each element
Draft a probable-cause affidavit skeleton for a hypothetical search with facts, inferences, and a specific request for items to be seized
Your checkpoint
A graded-style set of answers to three search-and-seizure scenarios plus a one-page probable-cause affidavit draft
Counterintelligence and National Security Investigations
Define counterintelligence, insider threat, and espionage-related collection and distinguish them from criminal fraud investigations
Identify the agencies and reporting channels in the national-security pipeline (FBI, NCIS, DIA, NSA, DoD CI components) and what each owns
Explain how classified information handling, security clearances, and need-to-know affect interview and evidence decisions
Build a decision tree for when a case should be treated as a national-security matter versus a criminal one
Your checkpoint
A one-page CI-vs-criminal decision tree plus a 15-term glossary of national-security vocabulary written from memory
Counterintelligence and National Security Investigations & Fraud, Economic Crime, and Procurement Integrity
Walk through a procurement-integrity fact pattern: identify the contracting phase, the vulnerability, and the fraud indicator
List the elements of bribery, gratuity, conflict-of-interest, and false-claim offenses and match each to the evidence that proves it
Explain how source operations and CI interviews differ from criminal interviews and when each is appropriate
Practice spotting red flags in contract documents (bid rotation, split purchases, unusual modifications) from a self-built checklist
Your checkpoint
A written analysis of a fictional procurement case identifying at least five indicators, the likely offense, and the evidence needed to prove each element
Fraud, Economic Crime, and Procurement Integrity & Cyber and Technology-Enabled Crime Investigation
Trace the money in a fraud scenario: identify the accounts, transfers, and records that establish intent and loss amount
Explain the basics of digital evidence acquisition (imaging, hashing, write-blocking) and why integrity matters in court
Describe common technology-enabled crimes (business email compromise, account takeover, ransomware) and the first investigative steps for each
Draft preservation and records-request language appropriate for a financial or communications provider
Your checkpoint
A fraud-and-cyber case packet containing a funds-flow summary, a digital-evidence handling note, and one preservation letter draft
Interviewing, Interrogation, and Source Operations
Distinguish interview from interrogation and identify when Miranda and voluntariness rules apply
Build a questioning plan that moves from non-accusatory fact-finding to confrontation, with a written outline of themes and transitions
Practice recognizing and resisting coercion, false-confession risk, and improper promises
Explain source recruitment, handling, and documentation basics and how a source's credibility is tested
Your checkpoint
A recorded or written mock interview transcript with a self-critique identifying at least three improvements and one compliance risk
Report Writing and Case Documentation & Air Force and Department of Defense Organizational Knowledge & Professional Standards, Ethics, and Integrity
Write a case report in the standard structure: synopsis, facts, evidence, investigative steps, and recommendations, in plain and precise language
Identify the AFOSI mission, its relationship to the Air Force and DoD, and the reporting lines that affect a case
Explain the professional-standards rules on candor, conflicts of interest, and handling of sensitive information, and apply them to two ethical dilemmas
Edit a sample report to remove speculation, hearsay, and unsupported conclusions
Your checkpoint
A finished two-page case report plus a one-page ethics memo resolving two hypothetical dilemmas with cited reasoning
Criminal Investigation and Evidence Handling & Federal Criminal Law and Procedure & Counterintelligence and National Security Investigations & Cyber and Technology-Enabled Crime Investigation & Fraud, Economic Crime, and Procurement Integrity & Interviewing, Interrogation, and Source Operations & Report Writing and Case Documentation & Air Force and Department of Defense Organizational Knowledge & Professional Standards, Ethics, and Integrity
Run a timed mixed-domain practice set and log every wrong answer by domain and error type
Re-review the three weakest domains using the error log, not by rereading everything
Rehearse the highest-yield facts: elements of offenses, standards of proof, evidence-handling rules, and reporting channels
Build a one-page final cheat sheet in your own words that you could recreate from memory
Your checkpoint
A scored practice-set log with a written remediation list and a one-page personal cheat sheet covering all nine domains
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain, without notes, why a given search was lawful or not and name the exclusionary-rule exception that applies
Week 4: You can classify a fact pattern as CI, procurement fraud, or both, and name the evidence needed for each element
Week 6: You can run a 15-minute mock interview from your own outline and spot one coercion risk in your own transcript
Week 8: Your timed mixed-domain set shows at least 70% correct overall with no domain below 60%, and your remediation list is written