Interstate Telehealth and the Limits of a Pennsylvania License
Dr. Elena Reyes is a licensed psychologist in Pennsylvania with an office in Philadelphia. Eight months ago, her long-term client, Marcus, moved to Ohio for a graduate program. Marcus has remained in weekly video therapy with Dr. Reyes; he is physically in Ohio during each session, is clinically stable, and has no current crisis. Dr. Reyes also accepted a new client, Priya, who lives in Delaware and found Dr. Reyes through a Pennsylvania provider directory. Priya has traveled to Philadelphia twice for in-person sessions but otherwise attends video sessions from her Delaware apartment. Dr. Reyes holds only a Pennsylvania license. She has no PSYPACT E.Passport and has not checked Ohio or Delaware licensure requirements. Her malpractice carrier asks whether both cases are covered. Dr. Reyes wants to know whether she can continue treatment without interruption and what she should document.
1. Does Dr. Reyes's Pennsylvania license authorize her to continue therapy with Marcus while Marcus is physically in Ohio? Explain the statutory and regulatory reasoning.
Read the worked answer
A Pennsylvania license authorizes the practice of psychology in Pennsylvania; it does not automatically authorize services to a client who is physically in another state. At minimum, Dr. Reyes must satisfy Ohio's licensure or telehealth requirements because the client is located in Ohio during the sessions. Many boards treat the client's physical location as controlling, and some also look at the psychologist's location. Dr. Reyes should not assume that her PA license travels with the video feed.
Under Act 52 and 49 Pa. Code Chapter 41, the Pennsylvania Board retains jurisdiction over its licensees and may discipline a psychologist for practicing beyond the authority granted by the license or for unprofessional conduct. Practicing into Ohio without satisfying Ohio law could expose her to both Ohio enforcement and Pennsylvania discipline. If Pennsylvania and Ohio participate in PSYPACT and she obtains an E.Passport, that may provide authority, but she has no E.Passport here. The safe course is to verify Ohio's rules, obtain any required authorization, or arrange a clinically appropriate referral or transition. She should document the client's location at each session, the legal analysis, and any consultation with the Board or an attorney.
2. What should Dr. Reyes do before continuing with Priya, and does the fact that Priya sometimes travels to Philadelphia change the analysis?
Read the worked answer
Priya's case is a hybrid. When Priya is physically in Delaware, Delaware law governs whether Dr. Reyes may provide telehealth into Delaware; a Pennsylvania license alone is not enough. When Priya is physically in Philadelphia, Dr. Reyes may rely on her Pennsylvania license for that session, assuming no other legal barrier. The fact that some sessions occur in Pennsylvania does not cure the out-of-state sessions. Dr. Reyes should separate the sessions by location, check Delaware's telehealth and licensure requirements, and either obtain authorization or refer Priya to a Delaware-qualified provider for the sessions conducted there. She should not let the client drift without a plan.
Before continuing, she should also review her informed-consent form to disclose the limits of confidentiality and jurisdiction, confirm the client's physical location at the start of each session, and check with her malpractice carrier about coverage for out-of-state telehealth. If she continues without resolving the issue, she risks a Board complaint, insurance denial, and discipline for unprofessional conduct. Documentation should include the dates and locations of sessions, the steps taken to comply, and any referrals offered.
3. If Dr. Reyes continues without resolving licensure, what Board exposure does she face, and what documentation should she keep?
Read the worked answer
The Board could investigate a complaint alleging that Dr. Reyes practiced psychology without proper authority or engaged in unprofessional conduct. Discipline may range from a reprimand or fine to suspension or revocation, depending on harm, duration, and whether she disregarded clear obligations. The Board may also consider whether she abandoned clients by stopping abruptly without a transition plan. Her malpractice carrier may separately deny coverage for unauthorized out-of-state services.
Dr. Reyes should document: each client's physical location at each session; the licensure rules she checked; any PSYPACT or telehealth registration status; consultations with the Board, an attorney, or the carrier; the informed-consent discussion; and any referral or transition plan. She should not alter records after the fact. If she discovers she has already practiced unlawfully, she should stop the out-of-state sessions, obtain appropriate authority or transition care, and consider self-reporting with legal advice. Good documentation does not excuse unauthorized practice, but it can show whether she acted promptly and in good faith once the issue was identified.