PSE Prisma Cloud Professional study materials
PSE Prisma Cloud Professional study resources

PSE Prisma Cloud Professional cheat sheet

PSE Prisma Cloud Professional · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Cortex Cloud Platform

  • Cortex Cloud unifies CSPM, CWPP, CIEM, DSPM, code security, and SOC tooling in one console; the platform is the Prisma Cloud evolution branded Cortex Cloud, so exam items may use either name.

  • Agentless and agent-based (Defender/Outpost) workloads coexist: agentless scanning reads cloud snapshots for posture and vulnerability data, while agents add runtime prevention and process-level telemetry.

  • Prisma Cloud Compute (Twistlock lineage) supplies runtime defense; Prisma Cloud Enterprise (Bridgecrew/Redlock lineage) supplies posture and IaC scanning. Cortex Cloud merges both, so know which legacy component answers a given requirement.

  • Onboarding order: cloud accounts via read-only roles, then optionally agentless scanning roles, then code repositories (VCS integrations), then notification and ticketing integrations.

  • Cortex Cloud Data Security (DSPM) discovers sensitive data in object stores and managed databases, classifies it, and maps exposure paths; it is distinct from posture findings even when both reference the same bucket.

  • CIEM evaluates effective permissions by resolving role trust policies, permission boundaries, and resource policies; unused-permission findings require activity data from cloud audit logs.

  • RQL (Resource Query Language) is the query syntax for cloud resources and configuration; saved queries power custom policies, dashboards, and investigation.

  • The Prisma Cloud API uses access keys with a short-lived JWT exchanged at /login; role-based access control (RBAC) scopes users to accounts, clouds, and namespaces.

  • Cortex Cloud correlates an attack path across identity, network exposure, vulnerabilities, and data sensitivity; single-finding views omit the chained risk that attack path analysis surfaces.

Quick reference

Cloud Runtime Security

  • Runtime policy types in the workload agent: processes, networking, filesystem, container drift, Kubernetes audits, and malware; each has a mode of monitor, alert, or prevent.

  • Defender is the workload agent; Console/Consoleless deployment options exist, and an Outpost is a self-hosted component for registry scanning and intelligence in air-gapped or high-volume environments.

  • Container runtime models: WAAS (web application and API security) inspects inbound HTTP; runtime radar/behavioral models flag anomalous process or network activity against learned baselines.

  • Host and container compliance checks compare running configuration against CIS benchmarks and custom checks; runtime compliance differs from posture scanning because it evaluates the live workload, not the cloud control plane.

  • Forensics captures include process trees, open ports, and container image metadata; they are triggered by incident response actions or runtime policies and stored for investigation.

  • Serverless and FaaS runtime protection relies on function-level instrumentation or cloud-native telemetry; a host agent cannot run inside managed function environments.

  • Kubernetes runtime defense watches for anomalous exec, privileged pod creation, and sensitive mount activity; admission control blocks at deploy time, while runtime defense acts after start.

  • Malware scanning in runtime uses hash reputation and behavioral indicators; file-integrity monitoring records baseline hashes and alerts on modification of watched paths.

  • Incident response actions from the console include isolate host, kill process, quarantine file, and block connection; isolation uses host firewall rules and must be reversible.

Quick reference

Application Security

  • Shift-left layers: IDE plugin, pre-commit, pull-request scanning, CI pipeline gate, registry scan, and runtime. Each layer blocks at a different point and produces different feedback latency.

  • IaC scanning covers Terraform, CloudFormation, ARM, Kubernetes manifests, and Helm; policy results map to the same cloud posture policies where the resource type matches.

  • SCA resolves open-source dependencies against advisory databases and builds a dependency graph; reachability analysis reduces noise by checking whether vulnerable code is actually invoked.

  • Secrets detection finds hardcoded credentials in code and commit history; a finding is only remediated when the secret is rotated, not just deleted from the current branch.

  • SAST analyzes source or bytecode for data-flow issues; it produces false positives without build context, so triage rules and suppression baselines are part of the workflow.

  • Supply chain controls include signed images (cosign/Sigstore), SBOM generation (SPDX or CycloneDX), and admission policies that reject unsigned or unverified images.

  • CI/CD gate policies define severity thresholds and fail-build behavior; a break-the-build policy must be scoped to the branch and severity to avoid blocking all merges.

  • Vulnerability priority in code combines CVSS, EPSS, fix availability, and reachability; raw CVSS alone overstates risk for packages not loaded at runtime.

Quick reference

Cloud Posture Security

  • CSPM evaluates cloud configuration against policies mapped to benchmarks (CIS, PCI DSS, SOC 2, NIST, ISO 27001); a compliance standard is a set of requirement-to-policy mappings.

  • Policy anatomy: a saved RQL query plus severity, remediation text, and compliance metadata. Custom policies reuse the same RQL engine as built-in policies.

  • Onboarding modes: read-only role (posture only), read/write role (remediation and agentless), and organization-level onboarding that auto-covers member accounts.

  • Auto-remediation executes a fix via cloud APIs or a CI/CD pipeline; it requires write permissions and should be gated by policy severity and approval workflow.

  • Attack path analysis ranks findings by reachable risk: public exposure plus vulnerable workload plus privileged identity plus sensitive data forms a high-priority chain.

  • Suppression and exception rules reduce noise; exceptions should carry an expiry and justification, or they become permanent blind spots.

  • Drift detection compares deployed IaC state to live cloud resources; drift findings indicate manual console changes that bypassed the pipeline.

  • Cloud network exposure analysis identifies security groups, public IPs, and load balancers open to 0.0.0.0/0; it is separate from host firewall posture.

  • Asset inventory and tagging drive scoping; untagged or unmanaged accounts produce coverage gaps that posture dashboards report as missing accounts.

Quick reference

SOC Processes

  • Alert lifecycle: detection, triage, investigation, containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned; each stage has an owner and an evidence artifact.

  • Severity triage combines asset criticality, exposure, exploitability (EPSS/KEV), and data sensitivity; a critical CVE on an internet-facing, data-bearing host outranks a critical CVE on an isolated test host.

  • MTTD measures detection latency, MTTR measures response latency; both are computed from alert timestamps and are the primary SOC KPIs.

  • Playbooks automate repeatable response (isolate host, disable key, open ticket); SOAR integration and webhook/API actions connect Cortex Cloud to the ticketing and SIEM stack.

  • Correlation rules merge related findings into a single incident to prevent alert fatigue; deduplication keys typically include resource ID, policy ID, and time window.

  • Threat intelligence enrichment adds IOC context and known-exploited status; an alert with a KEV-listed CVE and active exploitation warrants immediate escalation.

  • Forensic evidence handling requires chain of custody: capture, hash, store, and log access; runtime forensics from the agent feeds this process.

  • Post-incident review produces tuning actions: new suppressions, policy adjustments, and detection coverage gaps; unclosed tuning loops cause repeat incidents.