PECB Certified Artificial Intelligence Professional flashcards
PECB Certified Artificial Intelligence Professional · Build recall with a focused review session.
33 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Supervised learning
- A training paradigm in which a model learns a mapping from inputs to labelled outputs, minimising a loss between predictions and known targets.
- Bias-variance tradeoff
- Expected prediction error decomposes into bias squared, variance, and irreducible noise. Simpler models raise bias; more complex models raise variance.
- Precision and recall
- Precision is true positives divided by predicted positives. Recall is true positives divided by actual positives. They trade off as the decision threshold moves.
- L1 versus L2 regularisation
- L1 adds the absolute value of weights to the loss and drives some coefficients to zero, selecting features. L2 adds squared weights and shrinks them smoothly.
- k-fold cross-validation
- The dataset is split into k folds; the model trains k times on k minus one folds and validates on the remaining fold, averaging the k validation scores.
- Backpropagation
- The algorithm that computes gradients of the loss with respect to each weight using the chain rule, working backward through the network layers.
- Self-attention
- A mechanism where each token forms query, key, and value vectors; scaled dot-product attention with softmax weights lets every token aggregate information from all others.
- Reinforcement learning
- An agent learns a policy that maximises cumulative reward by interacting with an environment, balancing exploration of new actions against exploitation of known good ones.
- Overfitting
- A model fits training noise rather than generalisable patterns, showing strong training performance and notably weaker validation or test performance.
- NIST AI RMF functions
- GOVERN establishes accountability and culture; MAP frames context and risks; MEASURE applies metrics and testing; MANAGE prioritises, responds to, and recovers from risks.
- ISO/IEC 23894
- A guidance standard on managing risk in AI systems, adapting the ISO 31000 process to AI-specific impacts across the system lifecycle.
- Residual risk
- The risk remaining after treatment controls are applied. It must be documented, assigned an owner, and formally accepted against the organisation's risk appetite.
- Risk treatment options
- Four choices for handling an identified risk: mitigate with controls, transfer to a third party such as insurance, avoid the activity, or accept it with justification.
- Historical bias
- Bias arising when training data reflects past inequities in the real world, so the model learns and reproduces those patterns even with perfect sampling.
- Representation bias
- Bias caused when the training sample under-represents certain groups or conditions, so model performance degrades for those populations at deployment.
- Concept drift
- A change over time in the statistical relationship between inputs and the target output, so a previously accurate model becomes stale and needs retraining.
- Data drift
- A shift in the distribution of input features compared with training data, which can degrade predictions even if the input-output relationship itself is unchanged.
- Human in the loop
- A design where a competent human reviews and can override AI outputs before consequential action, with real authority and sufficient time to intervene.
- EU AI Act risk tiers
- Four tiers: prohibited practices, high-risk systems subject to conformity assessment, limited-risk systems with transparency duties, and minimal-risk systems with no added obligations.
- High-risk AI system
- Under the EU AI Act, a system in Annex III areas such as employment, credit scoring, education, or critical infrastructure, subject to requirements on risk management, data governance, and oversight.
- ISO/IEC 42001
- A certifiable management system standard for AI, following Plan-Do-Check-Act and specifying requirements for leadership, risk assessment, operational controls, and continual improvement.
- OECD AI Principles
- Five intergovernmental principles: inclusive growth, human-centred values, transparency and explainability, robustness and safety, and accountability across the AI lifecycle.
- AI system inventory
- A register of deployed and planned AI use cases recording owner, model version, data sources, affected population, risk rating, oversight level, and next review date.
- Transparency obligation
- A duty to inform people that they are interacting with an AI system and to disclose meaningful information about its logic, outputs, and consequences.
- AI governance roles
- The governing body sets risk appetite; an AI risk owner approves use cases; model owners are accountable; independent review verifies controls.
- Digital transformation stage gates
- Decision checkpoints across ideation, pilot, scale, and retire phases that release funding only when predefined benefit and risk criteria are met.
- Adversarial evasion attack
- A deliberately perturbed input, often imperceptible to humans, crafted at inference time to make a trained model produce an incorrect output.
- Data poisoning
- An attack that corrupts or manipulates training data so the resulting model misbehaves on chosen inputs or carries an implanted backdoor trigger.
- Model extraction
- An attack that queries a deployed model repeatedly to reconstruct a functionally similar substitute, enabling further attacks and intellectual property loss.
- Prompt injection
- An attack where crafted text overrides an LLM's instructions. Direct injection comes from user input; indirect injection is hidden in retrieved documents or tool output.
- Differential privacy
- A guarantee that adding or removing one record changes outputs only marginally, controlled by a privacy budget epsilon; smaller epsilon means stronger privacy.
- GDPR Article 22
- Grants individuals rights over solely automated decisions with legal or similarly significant effects, including human intervention, expressing a view, and contesting the outcome.
- OWASP LLM Top 10
- A ranked list of large language model application risks, including prompt injection, insecure output handling, training-data poisoning, sensitive information disclosure, and excessive agency.