The Empty Lesson-Plan Folder
You are auditing a language school's 'planning of teaching' process. A teacher says in an interview, 'We rarely get lesson plans before the term starts; I have been improvising since January.' The campus manager interrupts: 'That teacher has a grievance; don't take it seriously.' You ask to see the shared lesson-plan folder. It contains plans for term 1 but nothing for terms 2 or 3. The manager says plans are 'on teachers' laptops' and offers to show you one undated file. The school's procedure requires approved lesson plans before each term. You have 45 minutes left at this campus and a closing meeting tomorrow.
1. How should you handle the conflicting evidence and the manager's interruption?
Read the worked answer
Treat the teacher's statement as a lead, not a conclusion. The manager's 'grievance' comment is not evidence and may indicate pressure, but it does not prove or disprove the claim. I would ask open questions: which terms, which subjects, what happens when plans are missing, who approves plans, and where are they stored? Then seek corroboration through the shared folder, emails, approval records, version history, other teachers' files, and learner complaints.
The undated file is weak evidence because the procedure requires approved plans before term. I would sample two or three other teachers and check terms 2 and 3. If the folder is empty, no approvals exist, and other teachers confirm the same practice, there is enough evidence of a nonconformity against the planning and provision requirements and documented information controls. If other teachers show approved plans, the issue may be isolated. I would document the exact records examined and avoid arguing with the manager in front of staff.
2. What would you do with the 45 minutes remaining, and what would you put in the audit report if the evidence remains unresolved?
Read the worked answer
With 45 minutes, I would not try to audit the whole process. I would sample three teachers from different levels, ask each for the plan and approval for term 2, check emails to the academic coordinator, and ask the manager to show the approval workflow. I would also check whether the undated file has a version history.
If the evidence remains unresolved, I would not write 'no lesson plans exist' as fact. I would write a finding based on what is verified: for example, 'No approved lesson plans for terms 2 and 3 were available in the shared folder; three of four teachers interviewed said they did not receive plans; the only file provided was undated and unapproved.' If that is systemic, major; if isolated, minor.
I would present it at the closing meeting, give the auditee the chance to produce missing evidence, and record any disagreement. If the auditee later provides approved plans, I would verify and revise the finding if warranted.