NIST Cybersecurity Foundation flashcards
NIST Cybersecurity Foundation · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- CSF 2.0 release date
- NIST released version 2.0 of the Cybersecurity Framework in February 2024, a decade after the original 2014 version, adding the Govern function and expanding scope beyond critical infrastructure.
- Voluntary framework status
- The NIST CSF is voluntary guidance, not a regulation. Organizations adopt it to manage risk, while legal obligations arise from separate laws, regulations, and contracts.
- CSF Core definition
- The Core is a set of cybersecurity outcomes organized by Function, Category, and Subcategory. It states what should be achieved without prescribing specific products or implementations.
- Informative References role
- Informative References map Core Subcategories to specific controls in standards such as NIST SP 800-53, ISO/IEC 27001, and CIS Controls, letting organizations reuse existing control work.
- Executive Order 13636
- The 2013 executive order that directed NIST to develop a voluntary cybersecurity framework for critical infrastructure, leading to the original CSF released in February 2014.
- CSF audience in 2.0
- CSF 2.0 targets organizations of all sizes, sectors, and maturity levels, including small businesses, non-profits, and state and local governments, not only critical infrastructure operators.
- CSF versus compliance checklist
- The CSF is outcome-based and risk-based rather than prescriptive. It does not define pass or fail criteria, so it complements rather than replaces audit standards and regulatory requirements.
- Framework terminology: Framework Profile
- A Profile is a selected subset of Core outcomes aligned to an organization's mission, risk appetite, and obligations. It describes current and desired cybersecurity posture.
- Govern function purpose
- Govern, new in CSF 2.0, establishes and monitors the organization's cybersecurity risk management strategy, expectations, and policy, and sits at the center of the other five functions.
- Identify function scope
- Identify covers understanding the organization's assets, suppliers, and risks. Categories include asset management, risk assessment, improvement, and the risk management strategy category.
- Protect function scope
- Protect covers safeguards that limit or contain incidents: identity management and access control, awareness and training, data security, platform security, and technology infrastructure resilience.
- Detect function scope
- Detect covers finding and analyzing anomalous activity. Its categories are continuous monitoring and adverse event analysis, spanning networks, physical environments, personnel, and external service providers.
- Respond function scope
- Respond covers actions after an incident is detected: incident management, incident analysis, reporting and communication, and mitigation, including coordination with internal and external stakeholders.
- Recover function scope
- Recover covers restoring assets and operations affected by an incident. Categories are incident recovery plan execution and incident recovery communication with stakeholders.
- Six CSF 2.0 Functions
- The CSF 2.0 Core has six Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. Govern is new compared with the five Functions of CSF 1.1.
- Subcategory identifier format
- Subcategories use codes of Function and Category abbreviations plus a number, for example ID.AM-01 or PR.AA-05, which support mapping, gap analysis, and automated tooling.
- Functions are not sequential
- The CSF Functions describe concurrent areas of activity, not phases. Detect, Respond, and Recover operate alongside Protect, and Govern spans all of them continuously.
- Tier 1 Partial
- Tier 1 describes ad hoc, informal risk management. The organization has limited awareness of cybersecurity risk, and information sharing with external parties is minimal or absent.
- Tier 2 Risk Informed
- Tier 2 means risk management practices are approved by management but not adopted as organization-wide policy. Awareness of risk exists but processes are not formalized.
- Tier 3 Repeatable
- Tier 3 means formal, organization-wide policies and processes are defined, regularly updated, and consistently applied, with defined roles and methods for responding to change.
- Tier 4 Adaptive
- Tier 4 organizations adapt continuously, learn from experience, share information proactively, and use predictive indicators to improve cybersecurity risk management ahead of threats.
- Tier meaning clarified
- Tiers describe the rigor of an organization's cybersecurity risk governance and management processes. They do not measure absolute security or guarantee a specific risk level.
- Current Profile purpose
- A Current Profile records which Core outcomes the organization is already achieving and at what Tier, forming the baseline for gap analysis and remediation planning.
- Target Profile purpose
- A Target Profile states the desired cybersecurity outcomes aligned to mission, risk appetite, and obligations. Comparing it with the Current Profile reveals gaps to prioritize.
- Community Profile definition
- A Community Profile is a baseline Profile created and shared by a group with common interests, such as a sector or region, which members can adopt or tailor.
- Organizational Profile definition
- An Organizational Profile describes how an organization's mission objectives, stakeholders, and risks align with Core outcomes. It may cover the whole organization or a subset.
- Scope step in implementation
- The first implementation step defines organizational objectives, risk appetite, in-scope assets and systems, and applicable legal and contractual obligations before any Profile work begins.
- Gather information step
- Before building a Current Profile, collect existing policies, risk assessments, asset inventories, incident records, audit findings, and control mappings to establish an evidence base.
- Gap analysis output
- Gap analysis compares Current and Target Profiles to identify missing or underperforming outcomes. Its output is a prioritized list of gaps that feeds the action plan.
- Action plan contents
- An action plan lists prioritized gaps with owners, resources, timelines, and expected outcomes, ordered by risk and mission impact, and is tracked to completion.
- Iterative CSF lifecycle
- Framework implementation is continuous: after action-plan execution, Profiles and Tiers are revisited as threats, technology, and business objectives change, restarting the cycle.
- Prioritizing by risk appetite
- Gaps are prioritized using the organization's risk appetite and mission impact, not by maximizing Tier level, because a higher Tier is not automatically the right target.