Surge, Wind, and the Umbrella Above
A coastal HO-3 shows Coverage A $500,000, Coverage C $250,000, Coverage D at 30 percent, a $10,000 all-peril deductible, and a 2 percent hurricane deductible. The insured also bought a flood policy with $250,000 building and $100,000 contents limits and a $2,000 deductible on each, plus a $2,000,000 personal umbrella requiring $300,000 underlying homeowners liability and $250/500 auto limits, carrying a $10,000 self-insured retention. A hurricane pushes eighteen inches of water into the first floor and tears off shingles, letting rain into the second floor. The adjuster's engineer attributes $120,000 of the $180,000 building damage to surge and $60,000 to wind-driven rain, and allocates $25,000 of the $40,000 contents loss to flood and $15,000 to rain. Repairs will take eight weeks; temporary housing and meals run $14,400. Separately, a guest later falls from the dock and settles for $450,000.
1. Allocate the building and contents loss between the two policies and show the payments.
Read the worked answer
Building. The HO-3 pays the wind portion of $60,000, less the hurricane deductible of 2 percent of $500,000, which is $10,000, giving $50,000. The flood policy pays the surge portion of $120,000, less the $2,000 building deductible, giving $118,000, comfortably inside the $250,000 building limit. Combined the two policies pay $168,000 of $180,000, with the shortfall equal to the two deductibles.
Contents. The HO-3 pays $15,000 for rain damage. Check whether the hurricane deductible is applied once per occurrence across building and contents rather than separately; under most forms it is a single occurrence deductible, already absorbed by the building payment, so no second deduction. The flood policy pays $25,000 less the $2,000 contents deductible, or $23,000, inside the $100,000 contents limit.
Total. $50,000 plus $118,000 plus $15,000 plus $23,000 equals $206,000.
Caveat. Many homeowners forms contain anti-concurrent causation wording, under which wind loss is excluded if flood contributed to it, regardless of sequence. If that wording governs and state law enforces it, the entire building and contents claim could fall to the flood policy and be capped at $250,000 building and $100,000 contents. That dispute, not arithmetic, is the real exposure.
2. Is the $14,400 in temporary housing and meals payable?
Read the worked answer
Partly, at best, and the reasoning matters more than the number.
HO-3 test. Coverage D pays the necessary increase in living expenses when a covered peril makes the residence premises uninhabitable. The wind loss is covered, so the portion of uninhabitability caused by the roof damage supports ALE, up to 30 percent of $500,000, or $150,000. The flood-caused portion is excluded, because flood is not a covered peril under the HO-3. Where the house cannot be occupied until both the roof and the flooded first floor are repaired, the insured will argue the loss is indivisible and the entire period is attributable to wind; the insurer will argue allocation, or rely on anti-concurrent causation.
Flood policy. The flood policy does not provide the broad additional living expense protection of a homeowners form; at most it offers limited loss-of-use coverage. Do not assume the flood policy picks up the gap.
Measurement. Even if covered, ALE pays only the increase over normal expenses, so ordinary groceries, mortgage, and utilities continue and are not reimbursed. The insured should document hotel, restaurant, laundry, and mileage costs. The eight-week period is reasonable and well inside the limit.
3. How does the umbrella respond to the $450,000 dock settlement, and what is the role of the $10,000 retention?
Read the worked answer
Primary layer. The guest's fall on the dock is bodily injury arising from the premises, so the homeowners liability coverage responds first, up to its $300,000 limit. The HO-3 deductible applies to property claims; the liability coverage generally pays from the first dollar, so the full $300,000 is available.
Umbrella layer. Because the required underlying limit is satisfied and exhausted by payment, the umbrella pays the remaining $150,000 with no retention. The insured keeps the umbrella requirement satisfied and the loss is inside the $2,000,000 limit.
The retention. A self-insured retention is not a deductible. It applies when the umbrella drops down, meaning when the loss is covered by the umbrella but not by the required underlying insurance, or when the insured failed to maintain the required underlying limits. In a drop-down, the insured pays the first $10,000 before the umbrella responds, and the umbrella may also require the insured's consent to settle or to incur defense costs within the retention.
Defense. The umbrella typically has a duty to defend only after the underlying limits are exhausted, so the primary carrier controls the defense of the guest claim. If the primary tenders its limit, watch for the transition and for any obligation to cooperate.