PERT Reading study materials
PERT Reading study resources

PERT Reading cheat sheet

PERT Reading · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Key Ideas and Details

  • Topic is the broad subject (a word or phrase); main idea is the claim made about that subject (a full sentence). A question asking for the main idea requires a sentence, not a label.

  • Main idea location check, in order: last sentence of the introduction, first sentence after the introduction, the conclusion, then the first sentence of each body paragraph read as a set.

  • An implied main idea is confirmed only when at least two or three separate details point to the same unstated claim; a single detail supports an inference but does not establish a main idea.

  • A detail qualifies as supporting only if removing it weakens the main idea; details that are true but removable are minor and are excluded from summaries.

  • Valid inference test: the statement must be required by the text. If the passage could be true and the statement false, the statement is speculation, not an inference.

  • Sequence questions are answered by locating time markers (first, before, meanwhile, after, finally) and ordering events by those markers, not by the order sentences appear.

  • Cause-and-effect items: the cause answers why something happened, the effect answers what resulted. Reversing the two is the most common distractor pattern.

  • Summary criteria: covers the whole passage, contains no personal opinion, contains no examples or statistics used only as illustration, and is shorter than the original.

Quick reference

Craft and Structure

  • Four context-clue types and their signals: restatement (or, that is, in other words), example (such as, for instance), contrast (but, unlike, however), and cause-effect (because, therefore, as a result).

  • Denotation is the dictionary meaning; connotation is the emotional charge. Two words with the same denotation can carry opposite connotations, and tone questions usually turn on connotation.

  • Author's purpose is determined by what the text does, not by its topic: narrating events signals entertain or illustrate, listing reasons signals persuade, explaining a process signals inform or explain.

  • Tone is the author's attitude; mood is the reader's emotional response. Tone is identified from the author's word choice, mood from the effect of setting, imagery, and pacing.

  • Text structures and their signals: chronological (first, then, finally), comparison-contrast (both, unlike, whereas), cause-effect (because, leads to), problem-solution (the issue is, one remedy), description (spatial and sensory detail).

  • Figurative language identification: simile uses like or as; metaphor states one thing is another; personification gives human traits to nonhuman things; hyperbole is deliberate exaggeration; idiom is a fixed nonliteral phrase.

  • Point of view affects available information: first person limits the reader to one character's knowledge, third-person limited stays with one character, third-person omniscient can report any character's thoughts.

  • A shift in diction, sentence length, or punctuation inside a passage usually marks a shift in tone or purpose, and questions about structure often target exactly that turning point.

Quick reference

Integration of Knowledge and Ideas

  • Argument anatomy: claim (the position), evidence (facts, examples, expert statements), reasoning (the link between evidence and claim). A weak link between evidence and claim is a reasoning flaw, not an evidence flaw.

  • Fact versus opinion test: a fact can be verified by an outside check and stays the same for all observers; an opinion expresses judgment, value, or prediction and cannot be verified.

  • Bias indicators: loaded language, only one side of evidence presented, no counterargument acknowledged, statistics cited without source, and emotionally charged examples standing in for proof.

  • Evidence quality is judged on three separate criteria: relevance (bears on this claim), sufficiency (enough to support the claim's strength), and credibility (source has appropriate expertise or experience).

  • Two-passage comparison sequence: state the shared topic first, then compare purpose, tone, scope, and the kind of evidence each author uses; differences in evidence usually explain differences in conclusion.

  • Primary sources are firsthand (diaries, letters, raw data, eyewitness accounts); secondary sources interpret or summarize primary material (textbooks, reviews, encyclopedia entries).

  • Common fallacies to recognize: ad hominem (attacks the person), hasty generalization (concludes from too few cases), false cause (assumes sequence proves causation), either/or (offers only two options), appeal to emotion.

  • Synthesis requires stating a relationship, not just listing both passages: agreement, partial overlap, direct conflict, or one passage extending the other.