Incompatible Duties, a Missing Receiving Report, and a Supplier Gift
In the Municipality of Mabini, the treasurer supervises a staff of six. Internal audit finds that Ms. Cruz, a revenue clerk, receives cash and checks from taxpayers, issues official receipts, prepares the deposit slip, and also reconciles the bank statement. The internal auditor also finds a disbursement voucher for ₱320,000 for office equipment supported by a supplier invoice and purchase order but no receiving report or inspection report; the supplier is owned by the mayor's cousin. A supplier delivers a gift basket worth ₱5,000 to the treasurer during the holiday season, saying it is 'just a token' and that the treasurer has been 'very helpful' with pending payments. The treasurer has not acted on the audit findings and asks whether the gift can be accepted if it is shared with the office.
1. Identify the internal control deficiencies and the risks created by the current assignment of duties. Propose practical compensating controls for a six-person office.
Read the worked answer
The main deficiency is incompatible duties: the same person has custody of cash, records the transaction, prepares the deposit, and reconciles the bank account. That combination allows a collection to be removed and the reconciliation to conceal it. The missing receiving report and inspection report mean the municipality cannot prove that the equipment was delivered and accepted; the related-party supplier raises a conflict-of-interest risk.
Practical compensating controls in a small office include separating the counter from the depositor so one person receives and another deposits; having a second person perform the bank reconciliation; requiring the treasurer or a designated supervisor to review daily collection reports and deposit slips; using pre-numbered receipts and surprise cash counts; and requiring receiving and inspection by someone outside the treasurer's office for equipment. If segregation is impossible, the treasurer should perform documented supervisory review and rotate duties periodically. The point is to create a second set of eyes, not to pretend the risk is gone.
2. How should the treasurer handle the ₱320,000 disbursement and the related-party supplier issue?
Read the worked answer
The treasurer should not approve further payments until the receiving and inspection reports are obtained or a physical verification confirms the equipment exists and meets specification. The disbursement file should be completed with the missing reports, and the date of receipt should be documented. The related-party relationship should be disclosed to the mayor, the bids and awards committee, and the internal auditor; the treasurer should not be the sole approver.
If the equipment was not delivered, the payment should be suspended and recovery pursued. If it was delivered, the file should still be regularized and the COA auditor informed. The treasurer should avoid signing a certification that the documents are complete when they are not. The ethical issue is not only the cousin relationship but the appearance of favoritism; transparency protects both the treasurer and the municipality.
3. Can the treasurer accept the ₱5,000 gift basket? Explain the ethical and control answer, including what to do with the gift.
Read the worked answer
No. A gift from a supplier with pending payments creates a conflict of interest and the appearance of impropriety, even if shared with the office. The treasurer is in a position to influence payment processing, so the gift is not a harmless token. The proper response is to decline politely, explain the policy, and document the offer.
If the gift cannot be returned immediately, it should be logged in a gift register and turned over to the municipality or disposed of under its policy; it should not be distributed to staff as a reward. The treasurer should also disclose the offer to the internal auditor and the mayor. The pending payments should be processed strictly on documents and queue order, with no favoritism. Accepting and sharing the gift would weaken the treasurer's authority to enforce controls and could be treated as a gift or conflict-of-interest violation. Ethical standards require avoiding even the appearance of influence.