IPOPHL Trademark Agent study plan
IPOPHL Trademark Agent · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Trademark registrability and absolute grounds for refusal
Map the full absolute-grounds checklist under the IP Code and enumerate every category of non-registrable mark with a one-line definition for each
Classify 40 sample marks into registrable vs. refused and justify each refusal with the specific statutory ground
Distinguish descriptive, generic, and deceptively misdescriptive marks and articulate the test that separates them
Explain acquired distinctiveness (secondary meaning) and identify what evidence a Philippine applicant must submit to prove it
Your checkpoint
A 3-page absolute-grounds decision tree plus a scored 40-mark classification log with reasons
Trademark registrability and absolute grounds for refusal & Application procedure, filing requirements, and prosecution
Draft a complete application set (request form, specimen, drawing, priority claim) and verify each filing requirement against IPOPHL rules
Sequence the prosecution timeline from filing through publication and registration, naming each office action and response deadline
Apply the Nice Classification to assign correct classes and identify multi-class filing pitfalls
Diagnose five defective applications and prescribe the corrective filing or amendment for each
Your checkpoint
One fully drafted mock application package with a prosecution timeline annotated with every deadline
Relative grounds, confusing similarity, and prior rights
Analyze confusing similarity across visual, aural, and conceptual dimensions and apply the dominancy and holistic tests
Distinguish related goods and services and argue likelihood of confusion using the relevant factors
Evaluate prior-rights claims including prior use, well-known marks, and bad-faith adoption
Compare a set of competing marks and rank them by confusion risk with written justification
Your checkpoint
A 1,200-word confusion analysis memo resolving five paired-mark scenarios
Relative grounds, confusing similarity, and prior rights & Opposition, cancellation, and other post-registration remedies
Draft a notice of opposition with all jurisdictional and substantive elements in correct order
Draft a counter-statement answering each ground raised in an opposition
Map post-registration remedies (cancellation, nullity, correction, renewal) to their triggering facts and filing windows
Identify procedural defects that would cause an opposition or cancellation petition to be dismissed outright
Your checkpoint
A paired opposition and counter-statement set for one fact pattern, plus a remedies comparison table
Infringement, unfair competition, and enforcement remedies & Rights conferred, assignment, licensing, and recordal
Enumerate the exclusive rights of a registered owner and the limits and defenses to those rights
Distinguish trademark infringement from unfair competition and identify the elements and remedies for each
Prepare an assignment and a license agreement clause set, then list the recordal requirements for each
Explain the effect of non-recordal and the consequences of unrecorded transfers on third parties
Your checkpoint
An enforcement options memo plus two recordable draft instruments with a recordal checklist
Infringement, unfair competition, and enforcement remedies & Opposition, cancellation, and other post-registration remedies
Build an evidence matrix linking each infringement element to the proof required and the forum that receives it
Draft demand, opposition, and administrative complaint documents with correct reliefs and damages claims
Analyze the interaction between IPOPHL administrative actions and court proceedings, including injunctive relief
Assess a border-enforcement or customs seizure scenario and identify the steps and deadlines
Your checkpoint
A complete mock enforcement file with evidence matrix and one drafted administrative complaint
International treaties and Madrid Protocol practice & Related IP concepts (copyright, patents, industrial designs, geographical indications)
Trace a Madrid Protocol international registration from filing through designation, examination, and provisional refusal
Calculate and apply the relevant treaty deadlines and identify the office actions each triggers
Compare trademark protection with copyright, patent, industrial design, and geographical indication protection and state where they overlap
Resolve five cross-domain scenarios by selecting the correct IP regime and the governing rule
Your checkpoint
A Madrid Protocol process flowchart with deadlines plus a cross-domain comparison grid
Professional responsibility and IPOPHL practice rules & Trademark registrability and absolute grounds for refusal & Relative grounds, confusing similarity, and prior rights & Application procedure, filing requirements, and prosecution & Opposition, cancellation, and other post-registration remedies & Rights conferred, assignment, licensing, and recordal & Infringement, unfair competition, and enforcement remedies & International treaties and Madrid Protocol practice & Related IP concepts (copyright, patents, industrial designs, geographical indications)
Apply IPOPHL practice rules on representation, conflicts, confidentiality, and candor to five ethics scenarios
Re-run full-length timed practice sets across every domain and log every error by domain and cause
Revisit the weakest three domains and close each identified gap with targeted review
Assemble a one-page rapid-recall sheet covering deadlines, statutory grounds, and remedy triggers
Your checkpoint
Two timed full-length practice scores above 75% plus a completed error log and recall sheet
Milestones
Week 2: Can classify any mark and draft a compliant application without notes, scoring at least 80% on a self-made absolute-grounds quiz
Week 4: Can produce a complete opposition and counter-statement from a cold fact pattern within 45 minutes each
Week 6: Scores at least 70% on a mixed set covering domains 4, 5, and 6 and can state every recordal requirement from memory
Week 8: Two full-length timed practice exams completed with scores above 75% and no domain below 60%