Fieldwork Supervision, Productivity Pressure, and Independent Plan Changes
Rosa is a BCBA supervising four candidates accruing fieldwork hours at a community agency. One candidate, Jamal, works 30 billable hours per week across nine clients, many with high-intensity aggression. Agency productivity requires 85% billable time. Jamal receives one hour of individual supervision weekly and attends a two-hour group supervision with three other candidates every other week; the BCBA counts the group as supervision for all. Jamal’s restricted hours include direct implementation, and he has begun independently modifying behavior plans when parents request changes because “there is no time.” His written supervision notes for the past month list topics but not his performance or feedback. The BCBA also bills insurance for Jamal’s cases but has not observed him with two clients in eight weeks. The agency asks the BCBA to increase Jamal’s caseload by two clients next month. The BCBA wants to know whether supervision is adequate and what to do.
1. Evaluate whether the supervision hours and structure are adequate.
Read the worked answer
Under common fieldwork standards, 5% of 30 hours equals 1.5 supervision hours per week. Jamal receives 1 hour individual plus 1 hour group per week on average (2 hours every other week), so the total is 2 hours, which meets the 5% minimum. But quantity is not adequacy: group is 50% of supervision, at the maximum if the standard caps group at 50%; the BCBA has not observed two clients in eight weeks; notes lack performance feedback; and Jamal is modifying plans independently. Supervision must include observation, feedback, and documentation of competency. I would not certify adequacy from the hour count alone. The BCBA should verify current BACB requirements, but the clinical and ethical problems are clear.
2. What changes would you make to supervision and documentation, and how would you address Jamal independently modifying plans?
Read the worked answer
Changes: stop Jamal’s independent plan modifications immediately and require BCBA approval. Use BST to train plan modification, data-based decisions, and parent communication; observe him with each high-risk client; provide written performance feedback with specific examples and trainee response. Increase individual supervision and document dates, observation, goals, feedback, and competency. Review each plan he touches. If the agency’s productivity requirement prevents this, negotiate reduced billable hours or caseload. Document the risk and escalate if needed. The BCBA should also model ethical behavior by not billing for unsupervised or unauthorized services.
3. How would you respond to the agency’s request to add two clients to Jamal’s caseload?
Read the worked answer
Adding two clients without adding supervision capacity would worsen risk. I would calculate the supervision time needed for the new cases, review Jamal’s current performance, and tell the agency that the caseload cannot increase until supervision and competency are adequate. Options include reducing other cases, adding a qualified supervisor, or delaying the increase. I would document the rationale and the agency’s response. If the agency overrides the concern, the BCBA must consider whether she can meet ethical obligations; she should not accept a caseload she cannot supervise. The client’s safety and the supervisee’s training needs take priority over productivity targets.