Zarah's Year-End Pressure: Revenue Recognition and Auditor Independence
Zarah is CFO of a listed Pakistani pharmaceutical distributor. Two weeks before year-end, sales are 8% below the market's growth expectation. The CEO asks Zarah to 'support' revenue by shipping PKR 180 million of product to three distributors on 30-day terms, although the distributors have not ordered and have a right to return unsold stock. The CEO also wants to capitalise PKR 45 million of routine software maintenance costs as an intangible asset. The audit partner, who earns PKR 12 million in tax advisory fees from the company, has indicated that both treatments are 'probably acceptable if documented'. Zarah's bonus is tied to reported earnings. The company's code of ethics requires fair presentation and compliance with IFRS. The board audit committee meets in five days. Zarah's team has provided a draft memo concluding that the shipments are 'sales' because invoices will be issued.
1. Identify the ethical and accounting issues in the revenue and capitalisation proposals, and explain the threats to Zarah and the auditor.
Read the worked answer
Revenue: under IFRS 15, revenue is recognised when control transfers. The distributors have not ordered, have a right of return, and may not have accepted the goods. Issuing an invoice does not by itself create a sale. Shipping PKR 180m to distributors to meet a growth target is channel stuffing; recognising it would overstate revenue and receivables and understate returns. A returns provision or no recognition is required unless genuine control has transferred.
Capitalisation: routine software maintenance does not meet IAS 38's criteria for an intangible asset. It does not create probable future economic benefits or a controlled resource, so the PKR 45m should be expensed.
Ethical threats: Zarah faces a self-interest threat because her bonus depends on earnings. The auditor faces a self-interest threat from PKR 12m of tax fees and possible familiarity or intimidation. The draft memo shows confirmation bias. These threats cannot be eliminated by documentation alone; safeguards and independent judgement are needed.
2. Recommend Zarah's actions and the appropriate accounting treatment, including escalation.
Read the worked answer
Zarah should refuse to record the PKR 180m as revenue without evidence that control has transferred. She should obtain the distributors' confirmations, review return rights, and recognise a returns provision or defer revenue. The PKR 45m maintenance cost should be expensed unless it meets IAS 38's recognition criteria, which routine maintenance will not.
She should document her analysis, discuss the disagreement with the CEO, and escalate to the audit committee before the meeting. She should ask the auditor to report the issues and the non-audit fee relationship to the audit committee, and the committee should review auditor independence and pre-approve any non-audit services. Zarah should not sign representations she believes are false. If overruled or pressured, she should seek independent legal or professional advice and use the whistleblowing channel. The board should disclose material uncertainties and correct the draft memo.
3. Assess how the audit committee should respond to the auditor's position and the fee relationship.
Read the worked answer
The audit committee should not accept 'probably acceptable if documented' as sufficient. It should require the auditor to explain the IFRS 15 and IAS 38 conclusions, provide technical references, and confirm that documentation does not substitute for substance. The committee should meet the auditor without management present, review the PKR 12m tax fee, and assess whether the fee creates a self-interest or self-review threat. It should pre-approve non-audit services, consider a fee cap or separating the tax work, and disclose the relationship if material.
If the auditor cannot demonstrate independence and technical support, the committee should consider a second opinion or a tender. It should also review whether management pressure and the CFO's bonus created an incentives problem, and correct the financial statements before issuance. The committee's duty is to protect fair presentation, not to smooth earnings.