NIBAF AML & CFT study plan
NIBAF AML & CFT · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
AML/CFT Foundations, Terminology and the International Framework & Pakistan Legal and Regulatory Framework (AML Act 2010 and SBP/regulator requirements)
Define money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing, and distinguish their placement, layering and integration mechanics using your own worked examples
Map the roles of FATF, the UN Security Council, the Basel Committee and Wolfsberg Group onto a one-page diagram of the international framework
Trace how the Financial Action Task Force Recommendations are structured (the R-series and Immediate Outcomes) and explain the difference between a Recommendation and a binding Pakistani obligation
Outline the architecture of the AML Act 2010: its purpose, key defined terms, and which bodies it establishes or empowers
Build a glossary of 40 core terms (predicate offence, beneficial owner, PEP, STR, CTR, TFS, DNFBP, ML/TF risk) with a one-line definition each
Your checkpoint
A 40-term glossary plus a one-page international-framework diagram, both checked against the AML Act 2010 definitions for consistency
Pakistan Legal and Regulatory Framework (AML Act 2010 and SBP/regulator requirements)
Read the AML Act 2010 end to end and list, section by section, the duties it places on reporting entities and financial institutions
Identify the regulators named in the Act and summarise the supervisory and enforcement powers each holds
Explain the roles of the Financial Monitoring Unit, the National Counter Terrorism Authority and the relevant investigation agencies in the reporting chain
Compare the AML Act 2010 record-keeping and reporting duties with the corresponding State Bank of Pakistan AML/CFT instructions
Draft a 15-question self-test on Act provisions and answer it without notes
Your checkpoint
A section-by-section duty table linking each AML Act 2010 obligation to the responsible party and the corresponding regulator instruction
Pakistan Legal and Regulatory Framework (AML Act 2010 and SBP/regulator requirements) & Customer Due Diligence, KYC, Beneficial Ownership and Enhanced Due Diligence
Extract the SBP AML/CFT/CPF regulatory requirements on customer due diligence, customer risk rating and ongoing monitoring into a checklist
Distinguish CDD, simplified due diligence and enhanced due diligence, and state when each is permitted or mandatory
Explain beneficial ownership identification: thresholds, ownership versus control, and the layered approach for legal persons and arrangements
Specify the identification and verification evidence acceptable for individuals and for legal entities under Pakistani requirements
Apply PEP classification rules, including domestic, foreign and international-organisation PEPs, and the treatment of family members and close associates
Your checkpoint
A CDD/EDD decision tree covering individual, legal entity, beneficial owner, PEP and high-risk scenarios, with the required evidence at each branch
Customer Due Diligence, KYC, Beneficial Ownership and Enhanced Due Diligence & FATF Recommendations, Mutual Evaluation and Targeted Financial Sanctions
Work through five short customer scenarios and assign a risk rating with written justification for each
Describe the FATF risk-based approach and explain why it does not permit a no-diligence outcome
Summarise the FATF Recommendations most heavily tested in practice: the R.10 CDD standard, R.20 STR reporting, R.11 record keeping and R.16 payment transparency
Explain the mutual evaluation process, the meaning of Immediate Outcomes and effectiveness ratings, and how a jurisdiction's rating affects its institutions
State the components of a targeted financial sanctions regime: designation, freezing without delay, asset reporting and de-listing
Your checkpoint
Five written customer risk assessments with ratings, rationale and proposed ongoing-monitoring frequency for each
FATF Recommendations, Mutual Evaluation and Targeted Financial Sanctions & Suspicious Transaction Reporting, STR/CTR Processes and Financial Intelligence
Walk through the UN Security Council consolidated list screening process, including how to handle a potential match and the obligation to freeze without prior notice
Differentiate targeted financial sanctions from broader trade or sectoral sanctions and explain why the distinction matters for a reporting entity
Explain the STR lifecycle from internal detection through the Financial Monitoring Unit, including tipping-off prohibitions and the protections available to reporters
Distinguish STRs from currency transaction reports and other threshold-based reports, and state what triggers each
Describe what makes a good STR narrative: who, what, when, where, why, how, and the funds trail
Your checkpoint
Two model STR narratives written from supplied fact patterns, each meeting a checklist of required narrative elements
Suspicious Transaction Reporting, STR/CTR Processes and Financial Intelligence
Map the internal escalation chain from front-line alert to compliance decision, naming the decision points and timeframes
Explain how transaction monitoring rules and thresholds are calibrated and why tuning matters
Describe how financial intelligence from the Financial Monitoring Unit flows back to reporting entities and what may and may not be shared
Analyse the indicators of structuring, trade-based laundering, mule accounts and terrorist financing and match each to detection signals
Draft an internal STR decision memo that documents the rationale for filing or not filing
Your checkpoint
An end-to-end STR process map with decision points, timeframes and an accompanying decision memo template
Compliance Programme Governance, Risk Assessment, Training and Record Keeping
Structure a compliance programme around the four pillars: governance and oversight, policies and procedures, risk assessment, and training and testing
Explain the role of the board and senior management, the compliance officer's independence and the three lines of defence
Build an institutional ML/TF risk assessment methodology covering customer, product, channel, geography and delivery factors
Design a training plan segmented by role, with content, frequency and completion tracking
Specify record-keeping requirements: what to retain, for how long, in what form and how to handle requests from authorities
Your checkpoint
A one-page institutional ML/TF risk assessment methodology plus a role-based annual training calendar
AML/CFT Foundations, Terminology and the International Framework & Pakistan Legal and Regulatory Framework (AML Act 2010 and SBP/regulator requirements) & FATF Recommendations, Mutual Evaluation and Targeted Financial Sanctions & Customer Due Diligence, KYC, Beneficial Ownership and Enhanced Due Diligence & Suspicious Transaction Reporting, STR/CTR Processes and Financial Intelligence & Compliance Programme Governance, Risk Assessment, Training and Record Keeping
Review your glossary, duty table, decision tree and process map and close every gap you can still find
Complete a timed 100-question mixed mock exam and score each domain separately
Re-study only the two weakest domains, using your own notes rather than new material
Recite the key thresholds, timeframes and reporting obligations from memory without reference to notes
Write a one-page personal exam-day strategy covering question sequencing, flagging and time allocation
Your checkpoint
A scored mock exam report by domain with a written remediation list for the two weakest areas
Milestones
Week 2: You can state, without notes, at least ten duties the AML Act 2010 places on reporting entities and name the body that receives STRs
Week 4: You can justify a customer risk rating and the corresponding due-diligence level in under three minutes for any scenario given to you
Week 6: You can describe the full STR lifecycle, including tipping-off rules, and draft a compliant narrative from a fact pattern
Week 8: Your timed mock exam shows no domain below 60 percent and an overall score of at least 70 percent