PSDA Safety Inspector Exam study materials
PSDA Safety Inspector Exam study resources

PSDA Safety Inspector Exam: Diving Safety Program Administration and Standards Compliance

PSDA Safety Inspector Exam · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Diving Safety Program Administration and Standards Compliance

Why this domain matters

The exam tests whether you can tell a real diving safety program from a binder of policies. Inspectors look for a written program, assigned authority, documented implementation, and evidence that the program changes when operations change.

Core controls

  • Written safe practices manual covering scope, roles, dive procedures, equipment, emergencies, and records; controlled by revision number, approval, and distribution.
  • Named accountability: a diving safety officer or program manager with authority to suspend diving, separate from the diving supervisor at the worksite.
  • Management of change: a formal review before new equipment, new tasks, new depths, or new contractors are introduced.
  • Compliance monitoring: scheduled self-audits, corrective action tracking, and verification of closure.
  • Contractor control: prequalification and verification that subcontractors meet the same standard, not merely a signed statement.

A program also needs document control: current editions at the point of use, obsolete copies withdrawn, and records that show who approved what and when.

Worked example

An inspector finds a manual last revised four years ago. It names a supervisor who has left, cites equipment no longer owned, and has no procedure for a newly purchased surface-supplied system. The crew says they follow the manual anyway. Reasoning: the manual is not controlled and does not reflect current operations; the missing management-of-change procedure is a system failure, not a clerical one. The finding should be graded as a program-level nonconformity because it affects planning, equipment, and supervision at once. Corrective action needs revision control, an approval route, and a change-review step, not just a new date.

Traps that cost marks

  • Treating a manual as proof of implementation.
  • Accepting vague assurances that regulations are followed without written procedures.
  • Missing management of change.
  • Confusing the diving supervisor's worksite control with program ownership.