Fire Evacuation Drill and First Aid Cover at a Five-Storey Garment Factory
A five-storey garment factory employs 650 workers across two shifts. A fire drill was held on Tuesday at 11:00, during the busiest production period. Full evacuation took 9 minutes 40 seconds. The floor 3 stairwell was blocked by about 40 cartons of cut fabric, so workers from that floor used the passenger lift until a supervisor stopped them. The assembly point is across a four-lane road, and 60 workers were still crossing when the roll call began. Only two staff hold a current first-aid certificate; one was on leave on the day. The alarm is audible in the production halls but reportedly not in the fabric store or the two washrooms. The factory has one fire warden per floor, all of whom are production supervisors who were at their machines during the drill. Management says the drill 'passed' because everyone was out in under ten minutes. You are the security supervisor reviewing the exercise.
1. Critique the drill and identify which failures you would treat as urgent, explaining your prioritisation rather than giving a general list of improvements.
Read the worked answer
The drill did not pass, and management's ten-minute criterion is the first thing to challenge. The exercise exposed failures that could kill people, and the order of correction should follow life-safety impact and how quickly the control can be restored.
Urgent, same-week: remove the cartons from the floor 3 stairwell and establish a daily checked clear-access route. A blocked escape stair is an immediate life-safety defect, not a housekeeping issue. Also urgent: stop the use of passenger lifts for evacuation and brief all supervisors, because people using a lift during a fire may be taken to the fire floor or trapped.
High priority: fix the assembly point. Crossing a four-lane road with 650 people, with 60 still crossing when roll call began, means the roll call cannot be reliable and a second hazard has been introduced. Options include a safer assembly area on the same side, controlled crossing with marshals, or a staged assembly. This needs a site decision, not a security notice.
High priority: alarm audibility in the fabric store and washrooms. If the alarm cannot be heard, the evacuation time is meaningless for those areas. Test and add sounders or visual alarms.
Medium priority: warden coverage. One warden per floor who is also a production supervisor at a machine will not sweep toilets, storerooms and the far end of the floor. Wardens need relief, a checklist and a visible identifier.
The 9 minute 40 second time is not the headline; the blocked stair, lift use, unsafe assembly and unheard alarm are. I would rerun a drill after the urgent fixes and record what changed.
2. Propose a first-aid and medical response capability that is realistic for 650 workers over two shifts, given that only two staff are currently certified. Show your reasoning on numbers and coverage.
Read the worked answer
Two certified staff for 650 workers across two shifts is not a capability, especially when one is on leave. The starting principle is that first aid must be available on every shift, in every high-risk area, within a response time that matters for bleeding, burns, collapse and crush injuries.
I would estimate coverage from the layout and risk, not from a single headline ratio. First, the factory should have a nominated first-aid room or point on the ground floor with a visible sign, a stretcher, burns kit, eye wash, and a means to call an ambulance. Second, each floor should have at least one trained first aider per shift, plus additional cover in the cutting, pressing and chemical stores areas. A practical target is roughly one trained first aider per 50-75 workers per shift, with overlap so that leave and absence do not leave a floor uncovered. For 650 across two shifts, that suggests around 10-14 trained people in total, distributed across floors and shifts, not concentrated in the office.
Certification should be scheduled so that refresher dates are staggered; otherwise the whole cohort lapses together. Records belong in the training matrix and should be checked before roster publication. The person on leave should have been covered by a nominated deputy, which is a rostering control, not a training problem.
I would add a written procedure: who calls the ambulance, what information to give, who meets the vehicle at the gate, how an injured worker is moved (or not moved), and how the incident is recorded. Drills should include a simulated collapse, not only a fire evacuation. Finally, first-aid kits need monthly checks with a signed log, because expired supplies are a common failure in factories.
3. The factory manager argues that fire safety is the landlord's responsibility and that the security team should focus on theft. How would you respond, and what would you put in writing?
Read the worked answer
I would separate legal allocation from operational reality. The lease may assign structural fire systems to the landlord, but the employer still controls housekeeping, evacuation, worker training, alarm response and the behaviour that blocks a stairwell. The cartons on floor 3 were placed by the factory's own production staff, so that is not a landlord issue at all.
In writing I would set out, without pretending to give a legal ruling, the specific observations and who controls each: blocked stair and cartons (factory), lift use during evacuation (factory supervision), alarm audibility in store and washrooms (joint, to be tested and assigned), assembly point crossing (joint with building management and possibly the local authority), warden coverage and first-aid certification (factory). I would ask the landlord to confirm in writing which systems they maintain and their test schedule, and ask for the last inspection records. That converts a blame conversation into a responsibility matrix.
I would also make the business case in the manager's language: a fire or a serious injury stops production, triggers regulatory action and insurance problems, and the factory's export customers increasingly audit worker safety. Security's role is not limited to theft; an evacuation that fails is a security and safety failure with direct operational cost.
Finally, I would escalate through the joint safety committee or the building's fire safety arrangement, keep a dated record of recommendations and responses, and note that a repeated blocked stair after written notice is a matter the employer cannot credibly disclaim. I would avoid quoting specific legislation I have not verified; the record should state facts, owners and deadlines.