Praxis School Librarian study materials
Praxis School Librarian study resources

Praxis School Librarian study plan

Praxis School Librarian · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Program Administration

  • Map every Program Administration objective into a personal checklist, marking each as known, shaky, or unknown before studying any content

  • Define the library media specialist's administrative roles (budget, scheduling, staffing, advocacy, policy) and write a one-sentence job description for each

  • Draft a sample annual library budget covering print, digital, supplies, and professional development line items with percentage allocations

  • List the components of a written library media program policy (selection, reconsideration, circulation, acceptable use, privacy) and note which your own district likely already has

Your checkpoint

A one-page Program Administration objective checklist plus a draft annual budget table with at least six line items

Week 2

Program Administration & Library Media Program, Instruction, and Technology Integration

  • Compare flexible, fixed, and mixed scheduling models and write the instructional trade-offs of each

  • Explain how to align library program goals to school improvement plans and district strategic priorities

  • Identify the elements of an effective library advocacy plan aimed at administrators, teachers, and families

  • Describe how to collect and report program data (circulation, collaboration counts, instruction hours) for annual reporting

Your checkpoint

A 300-word scheduling recommendation memo for a hypothetical school, justified by instructional outcomes and program data

Week 3

Collection Development

  • Write or revise a collection development policy section covering selection criteria, formats, and community needs analysis

  • Differentiate the roles of selection aids, review journals, and patron requests in building a balanced collection

  • Outline a step-by-step reconsideration procedure that respects both district policy and intellectual freedom principles

  • Explain weeding using the CREW/MUSTIE criteria and apply them to three sample title descriptions

Your checkpoint

A complete draft collection development policy (selection criteria, reconsideration process, and weeding schedule) of at least 500 words

Week 4

Collection Development & Literature and Reading Promotion

  • Match award criteria to their awards (Newbery, Caldecott, Printz, Coretta Scott King, Pura Belpré, Schneider, Sibert) without looking them up

  • Build a reading ladder that connects a high-interest middle grade title to three progressively challenging read-alikes

  • Identify intellectual freedom principles and the difference between a challenge and a reconsideration request

  • Explain how to evaluate diversity and representation in a collection using published audits and review sources

Your checkpoint

A 20-title annotated reading ladder spanning at least three reading levels, each entry tagged with genre and award status

Week 5

Information Literacy and Inquiry

  • Sequence the stages of the inquiry process (questioning, locating, evaluating, synthesizing, communicating) and name one librarian intervention at each stage

  • Write three essential questions for a sample research unit that require synthesis rather than fact retrieval

  • Distinguish primary from secondary sources and design a task where students must justify source choices

  • Explain how to teach evaluation of online sources using lateral reading and source-triangulation techniques

Your checkpoint

A one-page inquiry unit outline with essential questions, staged librarian interventions, and a source-evaluation rubric

Week 6

Information Literacy and Inquiry & Library Media Program, Instruction, and Technology Integration

  • Apply a research model (such as Guided Inquiry Design or Big6) to a grade-level content standard and map each phase to a lesson

  • Describe co-teaching models (parallel, station, team, one-teach-one-support) and select one for a specific unit

  • Explain formative assessment strategies usable in a library setting, including exit tickets, conferencing, and process portfolios

  • Identify assistive and universal design technologies that support equitable library instruction

Your checkpoint

A co-taught lesson plan mapped to a research model with at least two embedded formative assessments

Week 7

Library Media Program, Instruction, and Technology Integration & Literature and Reading Promotion

  • Evaluate three digital tools for a stated instructional purpose using criteria such as privacy, accessibility, and cost

  • Explain how to build a digital citizenship scope that covers safety, copyright, and ethical use across grade bands

  • Design a reading promotion campaign that targets reluctant readers and includes measurable participation goals

  • Describe how to use circulation and reading data to adjust promotional programming mid-year

Your checkpoint

A reading promotion campaign plan with a target audience, three activities, a timeline, and success metrics

Week 8

Program Administration & Collection Development & Information Literacy and Inquiry & Library Media Program, Instruction, and Technology Integration & Literature and Reading Promotion

  • Take one full-length timed practice test under exam conditions and record raw scores by domain

  • Analyze every missed item by domain and root cause (content gap, misread, or terminology)

  • Re-review the two weakest domains using your earlier checklists and notes

  • Recite from memory the key definitions and frameworks for each domain in a 20-minute self-quiz

Your checkpoint

A scored practice test with a written error analysis and a ranked list of the three weakest subareas to revisit before test day

Milestones

Week 2: Can explain scheduling models, budget structure, and program advocacy in writing without notes, and scored at least 70% on a self-made Domain 1 quiz

Week 4: Collection development policy draft is complete and a 20-title reading ladder is finished with awards and genres verified

Week 6: Can outline an inquiry unit and a co-taught lesson from memory, naming each research model phase and one assessment per phase

Week 8: Full practice test completed with domain-level scores recorded; weakest three subareas identified and scheduled for final review