Praxis School Librarian study plan
Praxis School Librarian · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Program Administration
Map every Program Administration objective into a personal checklist, marking each as known, shaky, or unknown before studying any content
Define the library media specialist's administrative roles (budget, scheduling, staffing, advocacy, policy) and write a one-sentence job description for each
Draft a sample annual library budget covering print, digital, supplies, and professional development line items with percentage allocations
List the components of a written library media program policy (selection, reconsideration, circulation, acceptable use, privacy) and note which your own district likely already has
Your checkpoint
A one-page Program Administration objective checklist plus a draft annual budget table with at least six line items
Program Administration & Library Media Program, Instruction, and Technology Integration
Compare flexible, fixed, and mixed scheduling models and write the instructional trade-offs of each
Explain how to align library program goals to school improvement plans and district strategic priorities
Identify the elements of an effective library advocacy plan aimed at administrators, teachers, and families
Describe how to collect and report program data (circulation, collaboration counts, instruction hours) for annual reporting
Your checkpoint
A 300-word scheduling recommendation memo for a hypothetical school, justified by instructional outcomes and program data
Collection Development
Write or revise a collection development policy section covering selection criteria, formats, and community needs analysis
Differentiate the roles of selection aids, review journals, and patron requests in building a balanced collection
Outline a step-by-step reconsideration procedure that respects both district policy and intellectual freedom principles
Explain weeding using the CREW/MUSTIE criteria and apply them to three sample title descriptions
Your checkpoint
A complete draft collection development policy (selection criteria, reconsideration process, and weeding schedule) of at least 500 words
Collection Development & Literature and Reading Promotion
Match award criteria to their awards (Newbery, Caldecott, Printz, Coretta Scott King, Pura Belpré, Schneider, Sibert) without looking them up
Build a reading ladder that connects a high-interest middle grade title to three progressively challenging read-alikes
Identify intellectual freedom principles and the difference between a challenge and a reconsideration request
Explain how to evaluate diversity and representation in a collection using published audits and review sources
Your checkpoint
A 20-title annotated reading ladder spanning at least three reading levels, each entry tagged with genre and award status
Information Literacy and Inquiry
Sequence the stages of the inquiry process (questioning, locating, evaluating, synthesizing, communicating) and name one librarian intervention at each stage
Write three essential questions for a sample research unit that require synthesis rather than fact retrieval
Distinguish primary from secondary sources and design a task where students must justify source choices
Explain how to teach evaluation of online sources using lateral reading and source-triangulation techniques
Your checkpoint
A one-page inquiry unit outline with essential questions, staged librarian interventions, and a source-evaluation rubric
Information Literacy and Inquiry & Library Media Program, Instruction, and Technology Integration
Apply a research model (such as Guided Inquiry Design or Big6) to a grade-level content standard and map each phase to a lesson
Describe co-teaching models (parallel, station, team, one-teach-one-support) and select one for a specific unit
Explain formative assessment strategies usable in a library setting, including exit tickets, conferencing, and process portfolios
Identify assistive and universal design technologies that support equitable library instruction
Your checkpoint
A co-taught lesson plan mapped to a research model with at least two embedded formative assessments
Library Media Program, Instruction, and Technology Integration & Literature and Reading Promotion
Evaluate three digital tools for a stated instructional purpose using criteria such as privacy, accessibility, and cost
Explain how to build a digital citizenship scope that covers safety, copyright, and ethical use across grade bands
Design a reading promotion campaign that targets reluctant readers and includes measurable participation goals
Describe how to use circulation and reading data to adjust promotional programming mid-year
Your checkpoint
A reading promotion campaign plan with a target audience, three activities, a timeline, and success metrics
Program Administration & Collection Development & Information Literacy and Inquiry & Library Media Program, Instruction, and Technology Integration & Literature and Reading Promotion
Take one full-length timed practice test under exam conditions and record raw scores by domain
Analyze every missed item by domain and root cause (content gap, misread, or terminology)
Re-review the two weakest domains using your earlier checklists and notes
Recite from memory the key definitions and frameworks for each domain in a 20-minute self-quiz
Your checkpoint
A scored practice test with a written error analysis and a ranked list of the three weakest subareas to revisit before test day
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain scheduling models, budget structure, and program advocacy in writing without notes, and scored at least 70% on a self-made Domain 1 quiz
Week 4: Collection development policy draft is complete and a 20-title reading ladder is finished with awards and genres verified
Week 6: Can outline an inquiry unit and a co-taught lesson from memory, naming each research model phase and one assessment per phase
Week 8: Full practice test completed with domain-level scores recorded; weakest three subareas identified and scheduled for final review