Praxis 5302 study materials
Praxis 5302 study resources

Praxis 5302 cheat sheet

Praxis 5302 · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Foundations and Professional Knowledge

  • Standard scores: mean 100, SD 15 (deviation IQ/achievement); T scores: mean 50, SD 10; z scores: mean 0, SD 1; scaled scores: mean 10, SD 3; stanines: mean 5.

  • SEM = SD × √(1 − r); the 95% confidence interval around an obtained score is approximately score ± 1.96 × SEM.

  • Reliability coefficients range 0 to 1; ≥ .90 is generally expected for tests used in high-stakes individual eligibility decisions, ≥ .80 for screening instruments.

  • IDEA initial evaluation: complete within 60 calendar days of parental consent unless the state sets a different timeline; eligibility is determined by a multidisciplinary team.

  • Reevaluation at least every 3 years; IEP reviewed at least annually; parents may request an independent educational evaluation, which the district must fund unless it files for due process.

  • Procedural safeguards include prior written notice, parental consent for evaluation and placement, stay-put during disputes, and a manifestation determination review within 10 school days of a disciplinary change of placement.

  • Nondiscriminatory assessment: instruments validated for the purpose, administered in the child's native language or mode of communication, and never a single measure as the sole criterion.

  • FERPA: parents may inspect and review education records within 45 days of a request and may request amendment; release without consent is limited to narrow exceptions such as health/safety emergencies or court orders.

Quick reference

Instructional Planning and Delivery

  • Instructional hierarchy: acquisition → fluency → maintenance/generalization → adaptation; the intervention target changes with each phase.

  • Explicit instruction sequence: review, model, guided practice with high response rates, corrective feedback, independent practice, cumulative review.

  • Skill deficit → teach the skill with modeling and practice; performance deficit → change antecedents or consequences (prompts, reinforcement) rather than reteach.

  • Behavioral objective format: condition + observable behavior + criterion (e.g., "given a 2-minute probe, writes 40 correct digits").

  • Tier 2: small group (3–6 students), 3–5 sessions per week, 20–40 minutes, progress monitored every 1–2 weeks; Tier 3: individual, more minutes, weekly monitoring.

  • CBM goal setting: multiply the expected rate of improvement for the student's grade by 1.5–2.0 to target closing the gap toward the class median.

  • BIP components derived from the FBA: antecedent modifications, teaching a functionally equivalent replacement behavior, consequence strategies (DRA, DRO, extinction), and a measurement plan.

  • Accommodation changes access (extended time, read-aloud); modification changes content or performance standard (fewer items, below-grade material).

  • Reinforcement schedules: continuous reinforcement for skill acquisition, intermittent (variable ratio or interval) for maintenance; extinction may produce an initial response burst.

Quick reference

Assessment and Data-Based Decision Making

  • Progress monitoring: collect baseline (about 3 points), set an aimline to the goal, then decide after 4–6 points; 4 consecutive points below the aimline = change the intervention, 4 above = raise the goal.

  • CBM reading: median words correct per minute from 2–3 grade-level passages; CBM math: digits correct per minute; written expression: correct word sequences.

  • Sensitivity = true positives ÷ all cases; specificity = true negatives ÷ all non-cases; positive predictive value = true positives ÷ all positives and depends heavily on base rate.

  • Validity types: content (covers the domain), construct (measures the intended trait), criterion (correlates with an outcome, concurrent or predictive); reliability is necessary but not sufficient for validity.

  • Standard error of the difference = √(SEM₁² + SEM₂² − 2r₁₂ × SEM₁ × SEM₂); use it to judge whether two scores from the same student truly differ.

  • Norm-referenced scores compare to a norm group; criterion-referenced scores compare to a performance standard; percentile ranks are ordinal and not equal-interval.

  • SLD identification under IDEA must not rely on a single measure and must consider response-to-intervention data; ability–achievement discrepancy, patterns of strengths and weaknesses, and RTI are all permissible.

  • Functional/ecological data sources: record review, interviews, direct observation using antecedent–behavior–consequence recording, and permanent products.

Quick reference

Collaboration and Professional Practice

  • Behavioral consultation stages: problem identification → problem analysis → plan implementation → treatment evaluation; the consultee implements and the consultant supports with data.

  • Caplan's mental health consultation types: client-centered case, consultee-centered case, program-centered administrative, and consultee-centered administrative.

  • Conjoint behavioral consultation joins parents and teachers as co-consultees and targets generalization of intervention effects across home and school.

  • Interpreters: use trained, neutral interpreters (never the student or a sibling), address the family directly, avoid jargon, and allow extra time for two-way interpretation.

  • Confidentiality: share with school staff on a need-to-know basis; written parental consent is required for release to outside parties; limits include risk of harm, suspected abuse/neglect, and court order.

  • Dispute resolution ladder: informal problem solving → facilitated IEP → mediation (voluntary, confidential) → due process hearing → appeal to civil court.

  • Cultural reciprocity: surface your own cultural assumptions, learn the family's explanatory model, and negotiate a plan that honors both frames.

  • IEP team membership: parent, general education teacher (if the child is or may be in general education), special education teacher, district representative, someone able to interpret evaluation results, and the student when appropriate.