PRC cheat sheet
PRC · Keep the key ideas within reach.
Professional Research Conduct
Research misconduct is traditionally defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP); other questionable practices (e.g., undisclosed authorship, selective reporting) are handled under separate institutional policies.
Fabrication = inventing data or results and recording or reporting them; falsification = manipulating, changing, or omitting data, materials, or processes so the record no longer represents the work.
Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit, including self-plagiarism of previously published text without attribution.
Honest error or differences of opinion are not misconduct; intent, not merely an incorrect result, distinguishes misconduct from error under most institutional definitions.
Authorship requires substantial contribution to conception, design, execution, or interpretation, plus drafting or critical revision and approval of the final version.
Gift, ghost, and guest authorship are prohibited; corresponding author accepts responsibility for correspondence and for the integrity of the whole manuscript.
Informed consent and ethics review (IRB/IACUC) are required before human or animal research begins; protocol amendments need re-approval before implementation.
Data must be retained for a defined period (commonly 3-10 years, or longer per funder/institution) and made available for verification; raw data belong to the institution, not the individual.
COI disclosure covers financial interests, patents, advisory roles, and editorial relationships; undisclosed conflicts can invalidate a study's credibility even if data are sound.