SAFe POPM study plan
SAFe POPM · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Iteration Execution (28-30%)
Sequence the events of a single iteration (iteration planning, backlog refinement, system demo, Inspect & Adapt) and state each event's purpose, participants, and output
Differentiate which work belongs to the Product Owner at the team level versus the Product Manager at the strategy level
Write acceptance criteria for three sample stories using the behavior-driven, testable format
Explain how capacity, velocity, and story-point estimates combine to shape an iteration commitment
Your checkpoint
A one-page iteration cadence map plus three stories with written acceptance criteria, self-scored against a checklist of eight quality criteria
Iteration Execution (28-30%) & PI Planning Preparation (17-19%)
Refine a raw list of twelve backlog items into stories that are independent, negotiable, valuable, estimable, small, and testable
Calculate a weighted shortest job first ranking for ten backlog items and justify the ordering in writing
Assemble the inputs a Product Owner must bring to PI Planning: prioritized backlog, draft iteration goals, and dependencies
Identify which backlog items are too large to finish inside one iteration and split them
Your checkpoint
A ranked backlog of ten items with weighted shortest job first scores and a one-line written rationale for each rank change
PI Planning Preparation (17-19%) & Leadership for PI Planning (14-16%)
Draft a vision statement and a top-ten feature list with acceptance criteria that a team could plan against
Describe the preparation activities that occur before PI Planning for product management, the release train engineer, and the teams
Outline how draft PI objectives are written so they express business value rather than task lists
Prepare the planning context a leader must present in the business context briefing
Your checkpoint
A complete PI Planning readiness packet containing a vision statement, ten features with acceptance criteria, a draft set of team PI objectives, and a named risk list
Leadership for PI Planning (14-16%) & Understanding Product Owner/Product Management Roles and Responsibilities (12-14%)
Script the facilitation moves a leader uses across both days of PI Planning, including the confidence vote and management review
Classify five program risks as resolved, owned, accepted, or mitigated and assign an owner to each
Map how the program board reveals cross-team dependencies and where a leader intervenes when teams conflict
Distinguish the responsibilities of the Product Owner, Product Manager, and Business Owner across team, train, and portfolio levels
Your checkpoint
A two-day PI Planning facilitation script plus a risk log with five risks classified and owned, reviewed against a peer checklist
Understanding Product Owner/Product Management Roles and Responsibilities (12-14%) & Apply AI to Product Roles (12-14%)
Build a responsibility matrix assigning product decisions to the Product Owner, Product Manager, and Business Owner at each level of the organization
Identify the product tasks where generative AI adds real leverage versus the tasks where it introduces risk
Write prompts that generate draft stories, acceptance criteria, and backlog summaries, then critique the outputs for factual and quality gaps
State the review and accountability rules that must apply before AI-generated product content is accepted
Your checkpoint
A role-responsibility matrix across team, train, and portfolio levels, annotated with three AI-assisted tasks and the human review step each requires
Apply AI to Product Roles (12-14%) & PI Execution (10-12%)
Run one real backlog through an AI drafting workflow, then score the output against story quality criteria
Describe the events that sustain a Program Increment after planning: the scrum of scrums or ART sync, system demo, and Inspect & Adapt
Explain how Inspect & Adapt turns a system demo and metrics into a prioritized improvement backlog
Differentiate the flow metrics and outcomes a Product Manager tracks during PI execution
Your checkpoint
A written critique of an AI-generated backlog: prompt used, output scored against eight story criteria, with a rewritten version of the three weakest items
PI Execution (10-12%) & Understanding Product Owner/Product Management Roles and Responsibilities (12-14%)
Describe how problem-solving workshops convert root causes into actionable improvement items with owners
Trace how the ART backlog is built and how it competes for capacity against team backlogs
Explain continuous delivery practices and where the Product Owner influences release decisions
Rehearse the decisions a Product Owner owns when scope must change mid-PI
Your checkpoint
A one-page PI execution health summary defining the metrics reported at a system demo and the actions a Product Owner would take for three unfavorable scenarios
Understanding Product Owner/Product Management Roles and Responsibilities (12-14%) & PI Planning Preparation (17-19%) & Leadership for PI Planning (14-16%) & Iteration Execution (28-30%) & PI Execution (10-12%) & Apply AI to Product Roles (12-14%)
Re-test every domain against its exam weight and rank weak areas by the number of missed items
Complete a full-length timed practice set under exam conditions and log every incorrect answer with its root cause
Re-teach the three lowest-scoring topics in writing without reference material
Consolidate role differences, PI Planning inputs, and iteration event outputs into a single recall sheet
Your checkpoint
A timed practice exam score report with a categorized error log and a one-page consolidated recall sheet covering all six domains
Milestones
Week 2: Score 70 percent or higher on a 20-question set covering iteration execution and PI Planning preparation, and confirm the written acceptance criteria pass the story quality checklist
Week 4: Explain, without notes, the inputs, outputs, and leadership actions for both days of PI Planning, and correctly classify all five risks in the risk log
Week 6: Score 75 percent or higher on a 25-question mixed set spanning the two heaviest domains plus AI application, and show that the AI-output critique identified at least three genuine defects
Week 8: Complete a full-length timed practice exam at or above the target passing score, with every missed item logged and traced to a named domain and root cause