A Five-Million-Dollar Bond, a 1.50-Point Spread, and the Clock
At 9:47 a.m. a retail customer sells $5,000,000 face value of a 4.75% senior note due 2031 to your desk at 98.00, a price yielding roughly 5.1%. The note is thinly traded. TRACE shows two prior-day trades at 98.50 and 99.00, and that morning a dealer run of 97.75 bid / 99.25 offered. At 2:15 p.m. the desk sells the entire position to a different retail customer at 99.50. The desk head notes that the firm took six hours of inventory risk and made a 1.50-point spread on the round trip, and asks whether anything needs to be done before the confirmations go out.
1. What must appear on the confirmations, and how should the 1.50-point spread be evaluated?
Read the worked answer
Two separate issues: disclosure, and fairness.
- Disclosure: the firm acted as principal and bought the bonds from one customer and sold them to another the same day. The confirmation to the buying customer must disclose the firm's markup in both dollar and percentage terms. On $5,000,000 face, 1.50 points is $75,000, roughly 1.53% of the 98.00 acquisition price. Compute the percentage against the correct reference price and make sure the dollar and percentage figures agree.
- Fairness: the price to each customer must be fair and reasonable in light of the market, the size, the bond's liquidity, and the risk the firm carried. A 1.53% spread is not automatically excessive for a thinly traded block, but the file has to support it. The customer who sold got 98.00 when the best visible dealer bid was 97.75 - a defensible quarter point of improvement. The customer who bought paid 99.50 when the morning's best offer was 99.25, which is outside the visible market. Unless the desk can show the market moved during the day, the markup looks hard to defend, and the firm should be prepared to justify it or reprice before the confirm goes out.
2. What are the TRACE obligations on these two trades, and where do firms typically go wrong?
Read the worked answer
Each transaction is separately reportable, promptly and accurately.
- Reportable transactions in corporate bonds must be reported to TRACE as soon as practicable and no later than 15 minutes from the time of execution. The 9:47 customer sale should be reported by about 10:02 and the 2:15 sale by about 2:30. Both are reportable even though the firm was principal on both sides and the position was flat by the close.
- The common failures here are reporting a net or rounded price instead of the actual execution price, reporting the wrong capacity indicator, reporting the round trip as one agency or riskless-principal trade to conceal the spread, or simply running late because the desk was busy. Late or inaccurate reporting is a violation on its own, regardless of whether the pricing was fair, and the two issues are investigated separately by examiners.
- The desk should confirm the volume convention and face-value increments, and that both reports reconcile to the trade blotter.
3. Did the firm satisfy best execution for the selling customer at 98.00?
Read the worked answer
Probably, but only if the file shows the work.
- For a principal bid, best execution means providing the customer the best price available under the circumstances. The strongest fact is that the customer received 98.00 against a visible dealer bid of 97.75 - a quarter point better than the alternative the customer could actually have accessed. For a five-million-dollar block in a thinly traded note, that is meaningful.
- The weakness is that a single morning dealer run is thin evidence of the market at 9:47. The desk should document whether it shopped the block, what other dealers indicated, and why the size and the bond's illiquidity justified the price. If the desk knew of a 98.50 bid and bought at 98.00 anyway, the best-execution analysis changes materially.
- The spread taken on resale is analyzed separately, under the fair-pricing and markup-disclosure framework. A firm can satisfy best execution on the buy side and still fail on the resale price.