Eleanor's Annuity, David's Power of Attorney, and a Two-Year Liquidity Need
Eleanor, 79, is a widow with about $260,000 of liquid net worth: $180,000 in a bank CD maturing July 15 and $80,000 in a money market IRA. Social Security plus a small pension bring in $2,800 a month; her expenses run about $3,100. She calls her health 'fine for now,' but two close friends recently moved into assisted living, where care costs $6,000 to $7,000 a month. She wants to move $150,000 of the maturing CD into a deferred variable annuity with a 7-year declining surrender charge (7% in year one), a 1.15% mortality and expense charge, a 0.90% guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit rider, and underlying fund expenses averaging 0.70%. The application lists her objective as 'growth.' The next day her son David calls: he holds a durable general power of attorney and says, 'Mom gets confused in these meetings. Just submit the paperwork - I'll make sure she signs.'
1. Apply the care obligation to this recommendation. What does the analysis show, what facts are missing, and what would you need before submitting an application?
Read the worked answer
Run the numbers first.
- Annual contract cost: 1.15% M&E + 0.90% rider + 0.70% fund expenses = 2.75%, before any other contract charges.
- Year-one surrender charge on $150,000 = $10,500; year two ≈ $9,000. That is the price of reaching her own money if she needs it in 24 to 36 months.
- The money is 58% of her liquid net worth, and she is already cash-flow negative by roughly $300 a month. Her only genuinely safe, liquid assets are the CD and the money market.
The mismatch. Her stated need is liquidity for a possible assisted-living move at $6,000 to $7,000 a month within two to three years. A seven-year surrender schedule with an income rider she may never activate is the opposite of that. Writing 'growth' on the application does not cure it - the objective recorded should reflect what she actually told you, and the recommendation must be evaluated against her real circumstances.
Missing facts: other assets (home equity, long-term care insurance, any existing annuity or pension), family longevity and health detail, risk tolerance, whether the $80,000 IRA is her emergency reserve, tax bracket, and the terms of any existing contracts.
Reasonably available alternatives that must be considered and documented: renew or ladder the CD, a Treasury ladder, a short-term bond fund, a multi-year guaranteed annuity with a shorter surrender period, a no-load balanced mutual fund with no surrender charge, or simply holding more cash. If she wants lifetime income, a smaller allocation - not $150,000 - with a lower-cost contract.
Conclusion: as described, the full $150,000 recommendation is difficult to support as being in her best interest. Consider a materially smaller amount and a shorter, cheaper contract, and document the discussion either way. Deliver the prospectus and explain the free-look right (typically 10 days, longer in some states) - it does not solve a seven-year liquidity mismatch.
2. How do you handle David's power of attorney and his instruction to 'just submit the paperwork'? What is the role of the trusted contact?
Read the worked answer
Verify before you act.
- Obtain a copy of the POA and send it to compliance/legal. Ask: Is it durable (survives incapacity) or springing (effective only on a physician's determination)? Does it expressly authorize securities and investment decisions? Has it been revoked? Is it valid in the state where the account sits? Many firms require their own form, an affidavit, or an indemnification.
- A durable general POA does not automatically authorize every annuity exchange; the document controls.
Do not submit on David's assurance.
- As long as Eleanor has capacity, you deal with Eleanor. Her consent and understanding are required, and the recommendation must be in her best interest. A third party telling you to skip her is a red flag, not a convenience.
- 'Mom gets confused' is a capacity and undue-influence concern. Escalate to your principal and compliance immediately. If the firm reasonably believes financial exploitation is occurring, it may place a temporary hold on disbursements (generally 15 business days, extendable by 10) under FINRA Rule 2165, notify the trusted contact, and report to FINRA. Rule 4512 also permits a temporary hold.
- If Eleanor genuinely lacks capacity and the POA is valid and currently effective, David may act - but the firm must document the basis for that conclusion, and the suitability analysis still runs on Eleanor's profile.
Trusted contact. Rule 4512 requires the firm to make reasonable efforts to obtain a trusted contact person for a natural person. Ask Eleanor directly, not David. The trusted contact is not a POA, not a beneficial owner, and gives no authority to transact - it is a contact point if the firm suspects exploitation or cannot reach her. It does not have to be David. Also make clear why adding David as a joint owner is a different (and usually bad) idea: it is a gift, raises estate and tax issues, and exposes her to loss.
3. What must be in the account file and records when this matter is resolved, and why does it matter beyond paperwork?
Read the worked answer
The file has to let a principal, an examiner, or a arbitrator reconstruct exactly what happened.
Account opening and identity
- Customer identification information (name, date of birth, address, identification number) and the verification record.
- Trusted contact person and the reasonable efforts made to obtain one; names of authorized persons if a POA is accepted, plus the reviewed document.
- Beneficiary designation and the customer's own confirmation of it.
Suitability / Reg BI documentation
- Financial profile: income, expenses, liquid net worth, other assets, risk tolerance, time horizon, liquidity needs.
- The recommendation made, the alternatives considered, and why the chosen product was in her best interest.
- Cost comparison and the specific conversation about the 7% surrender charge, the rider fee, and the seven-year schedule.
- Prospectus delivery and the free-look explanation.
Supervisory paper
- The escalation to the principal about David's call, the capacity concern, the outcome, and any Rule 2165 hold, trusted-contact notification, or FINRA report.
- Principal approval of the account and of any annuity transaction.
Retention: books and records under Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 - six years, with the first two in an easily accessible place. The reason this matters is that when a senior client's family later disputes a surrender charge, the only defense is contemporaneous documentation showing she understood it and that the firm looked out for her.