The Wedding Party and the Pregnant Guest
A banquet server is working a wedding reception with an open bar. The bride's sister, Dana, is visibly pregnant and has been drinking champagne. She is cheerful, not obviously impaired, and has had two glasses over about an hour. When the server passes with a tray of champagne, Dana takes a glass. The bride's mother quietly tells the server, "Don't serve her any more - she's pregnant." Dana overhears and says, "It's my body and my choice. I'm an adult and I'm not drunk. Pour me another." The open bar contract runs until 11:00 PM; it is 9:15 PM. Other guests are watching the exchange.
1. What are the competing considerations, and what should the server do in the moment?
Read the worked answer
Competing considerations:
- Dana is an adult making her own choices; the server is not her doctor or guardian.
- The family member has asked the server to intervene, and other guests are watching.
- The server's actual legal duty is about intoxication and age, not pregnancy. Pregnancy alone is not a legal basis to refuse service in most jurisdictions, and treating a pregnant guest as incapable can be both inappropriate and discriminatory.
- The server should not become the enforcer of a family dispute at a wedding.
In the moment: The server should not make a scene or announce Dana's pregnancy. A calm, low-key response works best: "I'm not going to get in the middle of this - here's your glass, and I'll bring water around too." The server should continue to monitor Dana for actual signs of intoxication, which is the real service standard.
If Dana shows impairment, the server refuses on that basis. If she does not, the server serves her as any other adult guest and keeps the family conflict out of the service interaction.
2. The bride's mother is insistent and becomes upset. How should the server handle her without violating Dana's privacy or the bar's obligations?
Read the worked answer
The server should acknowledge the mother's concern without confirming or discussing Dana's condition in front of others.
A workable approach:
- Step slightly aside and lower the voice: "I understand you're worried. I'm keeping an eye on everyone, and I'll make sure she's safe."
- Do not promise to cut Dana off solely because she is pregnant, and do not repeat the pregnancy to other staff in earshot.
- Do not disclose to the mother what Dana has or has not been served beyond what is appropriate.
- If the mother continues to press, involve the banquet captain or manager, who can speak with the family privately.
The bar's obligation is to avoid serving an intoxicated person and to avoid serving minors. The server can honor the mother's concern by watching Dana closely and by making water and food available, without turning the mother's request into a rule.
3. At 10:45 PM Dana is laughing loudly, has spilled once, and is repeating the same story. What changes?
Read the worked answer
Now the server has observable signs of intoxication, and the basis for refusal shifts from the family dispute to the server's own duty.
Signs:
- Spilled drink (motor control).
- Repeating the same story (short-term memory and judgment).
- Loud laughing (loss of inhibition).
What changes:
- The server should stop serving alcohol to Dana, regardless of her earlier "my choice" argument. The decision is now about impairment, not pregnancy.
- Offer water and food; keep the tone kind and non-judgmental.
- Do not make an announcement. A quiet "I'm going to switch you to water for a bit" is enough.
- If she protests, the server states the decision once and does not debate.
- The server should let the banquet captain know and keep an eye on how she leaves - who is driving, whether she needs help.
This is also the point where the earlier family concern becomes relevant context, but the legal and policy justification is intoxication, not pregnancy.