Demerit Points and the Repeat Offender
A coffee shop stall has accumulated 12 demerit points over 18 months for two separate hygiene offences. Last week an SFA officer found a new offence: a food handler handling money and then plated food without washing hands. The stall's licensee, Mr Goh, says the offence is 'minor' and that the previous points 'should have expired'. He also says his FHO was on leave that day. The stall is part of a chain that uses the SAFE framework and displays a SAFE certificate. Mr Goh argues the SAFE certificate proves the stall is safe.
1. Explain how the demerit points system works and what the new offence is likely to mean for Mr Goh's licence.
Read the worked answer
How the demerit points system works (in general terms):
- Demerit points are assigned for specified hygiene offences.
- Points accumulate over a defined period; if the threshold is reached, the licence can be suspended or cancelled.
- Points expire after a defined period, but only if no further offences occur within that period - a new offence resets or extends the exposure.
Applying it here:
- Mr Goh already has 12 points from two offences in 18 months.
- The new offence - handling money then plating food without handwashing - is a serious hygiene offence, not a 'minor' one. It is a direct cross-contamination risk.
- The combined total is likely to cross the suspension threshold, and the licence may be suspended (or worse if the threshold is exceeded).
- Mr Goh's claim that points 'should have expired' is wrong if the new offence falls within the relevant period - and even if some expired, the new offence adds fresh points.
Key point: 'minor' is not a legal category. The officer records the offence; the points follow.
2. Does the SAFE certificate help Mr Goh? What is the relationship between the SAFE framework and the demerit points system?
Read the worked answer
The SAFE certificate does not immunise the stall.
Relationship between SAFE and demerit points:
- The SAFE framework is a structured food safety management approach (the acronym covers the core elements of a food safety system - e.g. ensuring good practices, assessing hazards, controlling them, and verifying/keeping records).
- The demerit points system is an enforcement mechanism that operates independently. A stall can hold a SAFE certificate and still commit offences that attract points.
- Displaying a SAFE certificate is evidence of a system, not a guarantee of compliance on the day. The officer observed the actual breach.
What this means for Mr Goh:
- The certificate does not cancel the offence or the points.
- It may, however, be relevant to mitigation if the stall can show the breach was an isolated lapse and the FSMS normally controls it - but that requires records, not just a certificate on the wall.
- The FHO being on leave is not a defence - the licensee must ensure cover and that controls operate every day.
Conclusion: the SAFE certificate is a system credential; the demerit points are the enforcement consequence. Mr Goh needs to fix the handwashing control and show it is monitored, not rely on the certificate.