Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst study materials
Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst study resources

Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst study plan

Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

SIEM and SOC Fundamentals

  • Diagram the data pipeline from forwarder to indexer to search head, labeling where parsing, indexing, and search-time field extraction occur

  • Map each core Splunk SOC component (indexes, sourcetypes, CIM data models, lookups, macros) to the analyst task it supports

  • Explain how the Common Information Model normalizes multi-vendor data and identify which data models a typical auth and endpoint log source populates

  • Write 10 SPL searches that use stats, eval, where, and time modifiers to answer basic SOC triage questions about authentication events

Your checkpoint

A one-page reference sheet plus a saved search file of 10 working triage searches, each annotated with the question it answers

Week 2

Risk-Based Alerting

  • Distinguish notable-event-driven alerting from risk-based alerting and articulate when each is appropriate

  • Decompose risk into its four components (risk object, risk score, risk message, risk modifiers) and construct a risk-generating search for a failed-login scenario

  • Configure risk scoring so that repeated low-severity events aggregate into a single high-priority finding

  • Compare risk object types and justify choosing user, system, or other entity types for three given scenarios

Your checkpoint

A working risk rule set covering three attack behaviors, with documented risk object choices and a risk index search that surfaces the top 10 risk-scored entities

Week 3

Risk-Based Alerting

  • Build a risk framework that maps detection coverage to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and identifies where risk rules are missing

  • Design risk notable policies that adjust urgency and suppress noise without suppressing signal

  • Tune false positives by adding risk modifiers and contextual lookups (asset criticality, identity role) to existing rules

  • Explain how risk-based alerting reduces alert fatigue by correlating independent weak signals into a single investigation

Your checkpoint

A risk framework document mapping at least 15 ATT&CK techniques to risk rules, with a tuned rule set and before/after alert volume comparison

Week 4

Risk-Based Alerting & Threat Hunting

  • Formulate hypothesis-driven hunt questions from a threat-intel report and translate each into SPL

  • Select appropriate data sources and time windows for a given hypothesis instead of searching everything

  • Apply the hunt cycle (hypothesis, data, analysis, finding, feedback to detection) to one full iteration

  • Document hunt results in a repeatable template that captures hypothesis, query, evidence, and outcome

Your checkpoint

One completed hunt report on a real or lab dataset that includes hypothesis, SPL, evidence, and at least one detection recommendation

Week 5

Threat Hunting

  • Hunt for living-off-the-land binary abuse and suspicious process ancestry using endpoint telemetry

  • Hunt for lateral movement and credential access by correlating authentication, service creation, and remote execution events

  • Use statistical baselining and outlier detection to surface anomalous entities rather than relying on static thresholds

  • Identify coverage gaps revealed by hunts and feed them back into the risk framework built in week 3

Your checkpoint

A hunt library of five reusable, parameterized SPL hunts with documented baselines and a written gap analysis for each

Week 6

Threat Hunting & Detecting and Investigating Threats

  • Convert successful hunt queries into production detections with appropriate thresholds, throttling, and risk scoring

  • Analyze malware and endpoint detection telemetry to reconstruct a plausible infection chain

  • Trace an intrusion across identity, endpoint, and network data sources to build a unified timeline

  • Distinguish true positive, benign true positive, and false positive outcomes and record the reasoning for each

Your checkpoint

Two hunt-derived detections promoted into the risk framework, plus a reconstructed incident timeline covering at least four ATT&CK techniques

Week 7

Detecting and Investigating Threats

  • Execute a structured investigation from alert triage through scoping, containment recommendation, and closure

  • Scope a suspected compromise by identifying all affected entities and the blast radius from available telemetry

  • Apply the analyst workflow to a multi-stage scenario combining phishing, execution, persistence, and exfiltration

  • Draft an incident summary that separates confirmed evidence from inference

Your checkpoint

A full incident investigation write-up with evidence citations, blast-radius assessment, and a findings/recommendations section

Week 8

SIEM and SOC Fundamentals & Risk-Based Alerting & Threat Hunting & Detecting and Investigating Threats

  • Re-audit every domain against the exam blueprint and list weak areas with a remediation action for each

  • Re-run all saved searches and risk rules to confirm they still produce expected results

  • Complete two timed practice sets and analyze every miss by root cause rather than by topic label

  • Rehearse explaining RBA mechanics, hunt methodology, and investigation workflow aloud without notes

Your checkpoint

A remediation tracker showing each weak objective, the action taken, and a passing score on both timed practice sets

Milestones

Week 2: Can write a risk-generating search from scratch and explain all four risk components without reference material

Week 4: Have completed one full hypothesis-driven hunt and can articulate how its result would change the risk framework

Week 6: Can promote a hunt query into a tuned production detection and reconstruct a multi-source timeline from raw events

Week 8: Scoring consistently above target on timed practice sets with no unresolved objectives left in the remediation tracker