Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst study plan
Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
SIEM and SOC Fundamentals
Diagram the data pipeline from forwarder to indexer to search head, labeling where parsing, indexing, and search-time field extraction occur
Map each core Splunk SOC component (indexes, sourcetypes, CIM data models, lookups, macros) to the analyst task it supports
Explain how the Common Information Model normalizes multi-vendor data and identify which data models a typical auth and endpoint log source populates
Write 10 SPL searches that use stats, eval, where, and time modifiers to answer basic SOC triage questions about authentication events
Your checkpoint
A one-page reference sheet plus a saved search file of 10 working triage searches, each annotated with the question it answers
Risk-Based Alerting
Distinguish notable-event-driven alerting from risk-based alerting and articulate when each is appropriate
Decompose risk into its four components (risk object, risk score, risk message, risk modifiers) and construct a risk-generating search for a failed-login scenario
Configure risk scoring so that repeated low-severity events aggregate into a single high-priority finding
Compare risk object types and justify choosing user, system, or other entity types for three given scenarios
Your checkpoint
A working risk rule set covering three attack behaviors, with documented risk object choices and a risk index search that surfaces the top 10 risk-scored entities
Risk-Based Alerting
Build a risk framework that maps detection coverage to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and identifies where risk rules are missing
Design risk notable policies that adjust urgency and suppress noise without suppressing signal
Tune false positives by adding risk modifiers and contextual lookups (asset criticality, identity role) to existing rules
Explain how risk-based alerting reduces alert fatigue by correlating independent weak signals into a single investigation
Your checkpoint
A risk framework document mapping at least 15 ATT&CK techniques to risk rules, with a tuned rule set and before/after alert volume comparison
Risk-Based Alerting & Threat Hunting
Formulate hypothesis-driven hunt questions from a threat-intel report and translate each into SPL
Select appropriate data sources and time windows for a given hypothesis instead of searching everything
Apply the hunt cycle (hypothesis, data, analysis, finding, feedback to detection) to one full iteration
Document hunt results in a repeatable template that captures hypothesis, query, evidence, and outcome
Your checkpoint
One completed hunt report on a real or lab dataset that includes hypothesis, SPL, evidence, and at least one detection recommendation
Threat Hunting
Hunt for living-off-the-land binary abuse and suspicious process ancestry using endpoint telemetry
Hunt for lateral movement and credential access by correlating authentication, service creation, and remote execution events
Use statistical baselining and outlier detection to surface anomalous entities rather than relying on static thresholds
Identify coverage gaps revealed by hunts and feed them back into the risk framework built in week 3
Your checkpoint
A hunt library of five reusable, parameterized SPL hunts with documented baselines and a written gap analysis for each
Threat Hunting & Detecting and Investigating Threats
Convert successful hunt queries into production detections with appropriate thresholds, throttling, and risk scoring
Analyze malware and endpoint detection telemetry to reconstruct a plausible infection chain
Trace an intrusion across identity, endpoint, and network data sources to build a unified timeline
Distinguish true positive, benign true positive, and false positive outcomes and record the reasoning for each
Your checkpoint
Two hunt-derived detections promoted into the risk framework, plus a reconstructed incident timeline covering at least four ATT&CK techniques
Detecting and Investigating Threats
Execute a structured investigation from alert triage through scoping, containment recommendation, and closure
Scope a suspected compromise by identifying all affected entities and the blast radius from available telemetry
Apply the analyst workflow to a multi-stage scenario combining phishing, execution, persistence, and exfiltration
Draft an incident summary that separates confirmed evidence from inference
Your checkpoint
A full incident investigation write-up with evidence citations, blast-radius assessment, and a findings/recommendations section
SIEM and SOC Fundamentals & Risk-Based Alerting & Threat Hunting & Detecting and Investigating Threats
Re-audit every domain against the exam blueprint and list weak areas with a remediation action for each
Re-run all saved searches and risk rules to confirm they still produce expected results
Complete two timed practice sets and analyze every miss by root cause rather than by topic label
Rehearse explaining RBA mechanics, hunt methodology, and investigation workflow aloud without notes
Your checkpoint
A remediation tracker showing each weak objective, the action taken, and a passing score on both timed practice sets
Milestones
Week 2: Can write a risk-generating search from scratch and explain all four risk components without reference material
Week 4: Have completed one full hypothesis-driven hunt and can articulate how its result would change the risk framework
Week 6: Can promote a hunt query into a tuned production detection and reconstruct a multi-source timeline from raw events
Week 8: Scoring consistently above target on timed practice sets with no unresolved objectives left in the remediation tracker