TSA TSO CBT study materials
TSA TSO CBT study resources

The Conflicting Instructions

TSA TSO CBT · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Conflicting Instructions

You are a TSO at a checkpoint. A passenger approaches and asks to bring a sealed, unopened bottle of water through. You know that liquids are restricted at the checkpoint, but the passenger insists that a sign near the entrance says liquids are allowed. You check and see that the sign is an old sign that has not been updated. The passenger is polite but insistent and says, "The sign says I can, so you have to let me through." There are 10 people in line behind the passenger, and your supervisor is on break for another 10 minutes.

1. How would you respond to the passenger's argument about the sign?

Read the worked answer

I would acknowledge the sign without arguing about who is right, and explain the current rule clearly.

Response: "I understand why you're asking, and I can see why the sign is confusing. That sign is out of date. The current rule is that this bottle can't go through the checkpoint. You can either leave it here or finish it before you go through."

Reasoning: the passenger is relying on a visible but outdated sign. The correct approach is to state the current rule plainly, acknowledge the source of confusion, and offer the standard options. I would not simply repeat "no" without explanation, and I would not let the passenger through based on the old sign.

2. How would you manage the situation given the queue and the supervisor's absence?

Read the worked answer

The queue and the supervisor's absence mean I need to resolve this quickly and calmly without escalating.

Approach:

  1. Give the passenger the clear options (leave the bottle or finish it) so the decision is in their hands.
  2. Keep the interaction brief so the line keeps moving.
  3. If the passenger refuses to choose and becomes disruptive, note the time and request a supervisor or another available lead, since the supervisor is on break.

Reasoning: the goal is a fast, correct resolution. Offering choices reduces confrontation and keeps the line moving. Escalation is reserved for refusal to comply, not for a polite disagreement about a sign.