TX Claims Adjuster study materials
TX Claims Adjuster study resources

The Duplex Sold on Contract for Deed

TX Claims Adjuster · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Duplex Sold on Contract for Deed

Maria sold her duplex to Devin on a contract for deed. Devin pays $180,000 over 15 years and lives in the property, but Maria keeps legal title until the last payment. Devin carries no insurance of his own. Maria still has her HO-3 in force on the duplex (Coverage A $300,000, $2,500 deductible, replacement-cost settlement). A kitchen fire causes $95,000 of replacement-cost damage; actual cash value is $70,000. Rebuilding the duplex today would cost $310,000. Devin's personal property, worth $12,000, is destroyed in the same fire. Maria files the claim and tells you, "I have no real loss here since Devin is buying the place - just tell me what I can collect."

1. Who has an insurable interest in the duplex at the time of loss, and what does the principle of indemnity require of you as the adjuster?

Read the worked answer

Insurable interest is measured at the time of loss, and it means a pecuniary interest - a value the person would actually lose.

  • Maria keeps legal title, so she retains an interest, but it is limited to the unpaid contract balance ($180,000) plus her reversionary interest. She cannot recover more than she would lose.
  • Devin carries the real economic exposure: the equity he has built and the value of a structure he is obligated to keep paying for. He has an insurable interest even though he is not a named insured.

Indemnity ties it together: the payout is limited to the actual loss of the party collecting and must not create profit. Maria's own words ("no real loss") are the cue that part of any payment belongs to Devin's interest, not hers. Paying Maria in full would over-indemnify her and expose the insurer to a second claim from Devin.

2. Calculate the maximum building payment available under Coverage A, and explain how you would handle the draft and Devin's personal property.

Read the worked answer

Two tests come before the deductible.

Replacement-cost eligibility (80% condition). 80% × $310,000 = $248,000 required. Maria carries $300,000, so she qualifies for full replacement-cost settlement - no proportional reduction.

Indemnity cap. The building settles at $95,000 replacement cost less the $2,500 deductible = $92,500. That is well below Maria's $180,000 interest, so the cap does not bite here.

Payment mechanics. Pay actual cash value first ($70,000 − $2,500 = $67,500) and hold the remaining $25,000 for release on completed repair, per the loss-settlement condition.

Draft and interests. A vendor/vendee agreement usually places the risk of loss on the buyer, so proceeds attributable to Devin's equity belong to him. Name both interests on the draft or obtain a signed direction from Maria before issuing it.

Devin's contents. Not covered. He is not an insured and not a resident relative, and a buyer's personal property is not insured property under Maria's HO-3. Advise him to look to his own policy.

3. The fire started because Devin left cooking oil unattended on the stove. Does the insurer have a subrogation claim against Devin, and how should you handle that question in the file?

Read the worked answer

Subrogation lets the insurer stand in the insured's shoes against the party legally responsible. The threshold question is whether that party is an "insured" - subrogation against your own insured is barred, and many policies also bar it against a co-insured or a person whose interest the policy protects.

Devin is not a named insured, so the bar is not automatic. But he holds an equitable interest that part of this payment is compensating, and the contract for deed may contain a waiver or a risk-of-loss clause allocating the loss to him. Recovering from Devin would also effectively shift the loss back into Maria's own transaction.

Practical handling: do not decide subrogation at the desk. Preserve cause-and-origin evidence (photos, the pan, recorded statements), place a subrogation hold on any recovery, and refer the question to management or counsel. If recovery proceeds, the insurer must account for Devin's share and must not use subrogation to sidestep coverage it already owes.