Journal Entry and Identification for a Remote Notarization
Priya is a New Jersey notary public commissioned in 2022. She performs a remote notarization for a client, Raj, who appears via video call. Priya verifies Raj's identity by examining his driver's license, which shows his photo and signature. She completes the notarial certificate and sends the document back electronically. Priya records the notarization in her journal, noting the date, time, type of act, and Raj's name. However, she forgets to record the type of identification used and the address where the act was performed. She also does not record the fee charged. Six months later, the State Treasurer's office audits her journal and notes the omissions. Priya argues that since the notarization was remote, the journal requirements are less strict, and that she was not required to record the identification or fee.
1. What are the journal requirements for a New Jersey notary public, and did Priya's journal entries comply? Explain the specific information that must be recorded for each notarial act.
Read the worked answer
New Jersey requires notaries to keep a journal of all notarial acts. The journal must include: date and time of the act, type of act, name and address of the person whose signature was notarized, type of identification used, and the fee charged, if any. For remote notarizations, additional information may be required, such as the technology used. Priya's journal is deficient because she omitted the type of identification, the address, and the fee. Even for remote acts, the same journal requirements apply; the law does not relax them. Priya's argument that remote acts have less strict requirements is incorrect. Her failure to record these details violates the journal requirements and could result in disciplinary action.
2. What are the potential consequences for Priya's incomplete journal? Discuss the enforcement mechanisms and possible penalties.
Read the worked answer
The State Treasurer has authority to enforce notary laws. Incomplete journal entries can lead to a warning, reprimand, suspension, or revocation of the commission, depending on the severity and pattern. The Treasurer may also impose civil penalties. Because Priya's omissions were multiple and occurred over time, they could be seen as negligence. However, if this is her first offense and she cooperates, the penalty might be a warning and required corrective action. The failure to record the fee is also a violation of fee reporting rules. Priya should promptly correct her journal if possible, but she cannot backdate entries. She should ensure future compliance. The audit findings could also be referred to the Attorney General for further action if fraud is suspected.