Complaint Against a Notary for Failure to Administer Oath
A notary, Diane, notarized an affidavit for a client, Mr. Lee. The affidavit required the affiant to swear under oath. Diane asked Mr. Lee, 'Do you swear that the statements in this affidavit are true?' Mr. Lee replied, 'Yes.' Diane then completed the jurat, writing 'Sworn to and subscribed before me' and signed it. However, she did not have Mr. Lee raise his right hand, nor did she say 'You are now under oath.' A dispute arises over the affidavit's validity, and the opposing party files a complaint with the State Treasurer, alleging that Diane failed to properly administer an oath. Diane argues that asking the question and receiving an affirmative response was sufficient, and that raising the hand is not required.
1. Did Diane properly administer an oath? Explain the requirements for administering an oath in New Jersey and whether a formal ceremony is required.
Read the worked answer
Administering an oath requires that the affiant be placed under oath and understand the significance. While no specific ceremony is mandated, the notary must ensure the affiant is aware they are swearing to the truth. Asking 'Do you swear...' and receiving a 'yes' may be sufficient if the affiant understands. However, best practice is to clearly state that the affiant is under oath and, if customary, have them raise their hand. Diane's method may be acceptable if Mr. Lee understood, but the complaint raises a question of fact. The notary's duty is to administer the oath, not just ask if the statement is true. The jurat states 'Sworn to,' which implies an oath was administered. If Diane did not actually administer an oath, the jurat is false. The investigation will consider whether Mr. Lee understood he was under oath. Diane should have explicitly said, 'You are now under oath' or similar. Her failure to do so could be seen as a violation, but it may not invalidate the affidavit if Mr. Lee understood. The complaint will likely result in a warning or training requirement.
2. What are the potential consequences for Diane if the complaint is substantiated? Discuss the disciplinary process and possible outcomes.
Read the worked answer
If the State Treasurer finds that Diane failed to properly administer an oath, it could issue a warning, reprimand, or suspend her commission. The disciplinary process typically involves an investigation, notice, and opportunity for hearing. Diane could also be required to complete training. Because the violation is procedural and not fraudulent, the penalty may be lenient if it's a first offense. However, if a pattern is found, revocation is possible. Diane should cooperate and demonstrate corrective action. The complaint also puts her on notice to improve her procedures. The outcome will depend on the evidence of Mr. Lee's understanding and any harm caused.