RICS APC Ethics study materials
RICS APC Ethics study resources

RICS APC Ethics: Professional Practice and Regulation

RICS APC Ethics · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Professional Practice and Regulation

What this domain tests

This domain covers how professional standards are governed and applied: codes of conduct, continuing competence, complaints and disciplinary processes, and the boundaries of professional judgement. You are not expected to recite a rulebook, but you are expected to know that standards exist, that they bind you personally, and that they are enforced.

Concepts to hold clearly

  • Personal accountability: the code applies to you as an individual, not only to your firm. A firm's culture never excuses your own conduct.
  • Continuing competence: staying current is an obligation, not a courtesy. You must recognise when your knowledge has aged.
  • Complaints and discipline: processes exist to protect the public. Cooperating with them is part of professional duty.
  • Scope of judgement: you may exercise discretion, but discretion is bounded by honesty, transparency and the reasonable expectations of those who rely on your work.
  • Records: decisions, advice and instructions should be documented so that your conduct can be evidenced later.

The traps

  • Deference trap: blaming a supervisor's instruction for your own breach. Instructions do not transfer responsibility.
  • Technicality trap: answers that are procedurally neat but substantively wrong - for example, following a sign-off step while ignoring a known risk.
  • Passivity trap: waiting to be told to update your knowledge rather than recognising the gap yourself.
  • Secrecy trap: treating a complaint as a personal attack to be suppressed rather than a process to be engaged with openly.

Rule of thumb

When a question asks what you should do, prefer the answer that is transparent, documented, and within your competence - and that would survive being read aloud to the affected party.

Worked example

You are asked to sign off work prepared by a senior colleague in an area you do not fully understand. The correct response is not to sign because of seniority, nor to refuse flatly, but to state your competence limit, seek the review you need, and only sign what you can stand behind.