UCAT flashcards
UCAT · Build recall with a focused review session.
33 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- True in Verbal Reasoning
- The passage explicitly states or directly implies the statement. Outside knowledge and personal opinion must never be used to decide between True, False and Can't Tell.
- Can't Tell option
- Applied when the passage neither confirms nor contradicts the statement. The information is simply absent, so real-world plausibility does not justify answering True or False.
- Verbal Reasoning timing
- The subtest contains 44 questions to be answered in 21 minutes, split into 11 passages of four questions each, averaging about 29 seconds per question.
- Keyword scanning technique
- Locate a distinctive stem word such as a name, number or date in the passage first, then read only the surrounding sentences before comparing the four options.
- Extreme qualifiers in options
- Words such as only, all, never and always make a claim harder to support, so options containing them are usually False or Can't Tell unless explicitly echoed by the passage.
- Author attitude questions
- These are answered from evaluative adjectives and adverbs plus concession words such as although, admittedly and yet, which reveal whether the writer approves, doubts or criticises.
- Percentage versus absolute number
- A larger percentage in one group does not mean a larger count. Check the base size (denominator) before choosing an option that compares quantities.
- Partially supported option rule
- An option that is factually true according to the passage but does not answer the specific question asked, or only partly answers it, is incorrect.
- 'Some' statement rules
- 'Some A are B' converts to 'Some B are A', but never supports 'Some A are not B' or 'No A are B'. It also cannot prove that overlap is incomplete.
- Contrapositive of 'All'
- 'All A are B' is equivalent to 'No non-B is A', which is a valid deduction. The reverse, 'All B are A', is invalid and is a common trap.
- Syllogism validity test
- A conclusion is correct only if it must hold in every possible arrangement of the sets. Finding a single counter-example drawing makes the conclusion invalid.
- Assumption in an argument
- An unstated premise the argument needs in order to work. Negate the candidate assumption: if the conclusion then collapses, it was genuinely assumed.
- Strengthen an argument
- The correct option raises belief in the conclusion, usually by supporting the link between the stated evidence and the conclusion rather than merely repeating the evidence.
- 'At least one' probability
- P(at least one) equals 1 minus P(none). For independent events, P(none) is the product of the individual failure probabilities.
- Two-set Venn formula
- Total equals A plus B minus both plus neither. Rearranged, the overlap 'both' equals A plus B plus neither minus the total.
- Decision Making format
- 29 questions in 31 minutes, roughly 64 seconds each, covering syllogisms, logic puzzles, probability, arguments, statistics and recognising information. A calculator is provided.
- Decision Making partial credit
- Some question types, notably syllogisms with five conclusions, award credit for each correct response, so attempt every option rather than leaving the item incomplete.
- Percentage change formula
- Percentage change equals (new value minus old value) divided by the old value, multiplied by 100. Always divide by the original, not the new, value.
- Successive percentage multipliers
- Convert each change to a multiplier and multiply in sequence: a 20% rise then a 15% fall gives 1.20 times 0.85, a net 2% increase, not 5%.
- Combined work rate
- For two workers, 1 divided by total time equals 1 divided by t₁ plus 1 divided by t₂. The joint time is always shorter than either individual time.
- Weighted average rule
- When group sizes differ, the overall average is the sum of all values divided by the total count, not the simple mean of the two group averages.
- Ratio share calculation
- For a ratio a to b, total parts equal a plus b. Value per part is total divided by total parts, and each share is its parts multiplied by that value.
- Speed distance time
- Speed equals distance divided by time. Convert units before calculating, for example dividing a speed in km/h by 3.6 to obtain metres per second.
- Quantitative Reasoning format
- 36 questions in 24 minutes, about 40 seconds each, answered using an on-screen calculator. Question sets are drawn from tables, charts and numerical scenarios.
- Estimation before calculation
- Round the figures, compute an approximate answer, and eliminate options. Precise calculation is only needed when two remaining options are close together.
- Appropriateness rating scale
- Used in Situational Judgement Part 1 with four points: very appropriate, appropriate, inappropriate, very inappropriate. Each response option in a set is rated independently.
- Importance rating scale
- Used in Situational Judgement Part 2 with four points: very important, important, not very important, not at all important, applied to factors relevant to the scenario.
- Part 3 selection format
- From eight response options, select the three most and three least appropriate. Each correct selection earns credit, so all six choices matter.
- Patient safety priority
- Immediate risk to patient safety outranks protocol, politeness and efficiency. Act within your stated role and escalate quickly to an appropriate senior.
- Concerns about a colleague
- Patient safety overrides loyalty. Raise the issue directly with the colleague where safe, or report it to a supervisor, rather than covering for them.
- Confidentiality exceptions
- Information may be shared without consent where there is a serious risk of harm to the patient or others, or where disclosure is required by law.
- Duty of candour
- When an error harms a patient, acknowledge it honestly, apologise and explain, then report it to a senior or the relevant clinical team.
- Role assumption in scenarios
- Answer as the person named in the scenario, such as a medical student or foundation doctor. Choosing actions beyond that role's competence is scored as inappropriate.