The Missing Microwave, the Stained Glass, and the Hot Tub
Marcus is under contract to buy Rita's 1978 split-level for $712,000. The Form 21 they signed says "all fixtures and attached items are included" and excludes personal property unless specifically listed. Rita's MLS remarks said "all appliances stay." Three days before closing, Marcus's final walk-through reveals: the built-in microwave is gone and a cabinet panel covers the opening; the wall-mounted pot rack is gone, leaving patched holes; the washer and dryer are gone, though the MLS called them "negotiable"; the hot tub is still there, but Rita says it is "furniture"; and Rita has removed a stained-glass window she installed in a wall opening in 2019 and replaced it with a plain pane. Marcus still wants the house, but he wants money. Closing is Thursday, and Rita's proceeds are her only leverage.
1. Classify each disputed item. Which claims are strong, which are arguable, and which are weak?
Read the worked answer
Apply the three-part fixture test-annexation, adaptation to the use of the realty, and the parties' objective intention-then check it against what the contract actually says.
- Built-in microwave: annexed (set into a cabinet), adapted (the kitchen was designed around it), and ordinarily intended to remain. Strong claim. Covering the opening is evidence Rita knew it was attached.
- Pot rack: screwed into the wall, adapted to kitchen use. Fixture; small dollar value, strong claim.
- Washer and dryer: not annexed, easily removed, customarily treated as personal property. "Negotiable" in MLS remarks is an invitation to negotiate, not a promise. Weak unless the offer's included-items section names them.
- Hot tub: hardwired and plumbed into the deck means annexed and adapted. Rita's label ("furniture") is not controlling. Arguable, but Marcus has the better of it.
- Stained-glass window: installed in a wall opening in 2019, then swapped for a plain pane. It was a fixture, and the substitution does not cure the problem, because the contract covered the attached item as it stood at mutual acceptance. Strongest claim of all.
Strongest to weakest: stained glass, microwave, pot rack, hot tub, washer/dryer.
2. What can Marcus realistically do before Thursday, and what are the limits of that remedy?
Read the worked answer
His leverage is the closing itself. Once Marcus accepts the deed, the merger doctrine will generally bar a later contract claim about the condition of the property unless he reserves the claim in writing at closing. So any remedy has to be executed before Thursday.
He cannot unilaterally deduct from the price: the earnest money sits in trust and the seller's proceeds are disbursed per the closing statement. Refusing to close over a pot rack risks putting Marcus in default, which is far worse than the pot rack.
Practical asks, in order:
- A seller credit at closing equal to documented replacement cost, supported by written bids.
- An escrow holdback of a set amount, released on delivery of the stained-glass window.
- If Rita refuses, reserve the claim expressly in the closing documents and photograph the walk-through.
A claim is worth what it costs to make whole, not what the buyer feels. Get the bids in writing before Thursday.
3. Identify the documentation failures that created this dispute and how each should have been handled.
Read the worked answer
Two failures.
1. Relying on MLS remarks. "All appliances stay" is marketing copy, not a contract term. The purchase and sale's included/excluded items section controls, and a generic "all fixtures included" does not resolve appliances, a hot tub, or an installed decorative window. Listing remarks create expectations the contract never adopts.
2. No written exclusion list. A seller who intends to remove an attached item must disclose that before mutual acceptance. Installing a replacement pane is not a substitute for an exclusion.
The fix is procedural: at listing, walk the property and enumerate included and excluded items one by one-appliances, hot tub, mounted items, mirrors, decorative installations, and anything the seller plans to swap out-then carry that list verbatim into the offer. Also advise the seller in writing that removing attached items after mutual acceptance is a breach, not a negotiating position.