Eight Weeks of No Change: Nutrition, Pain, and a Family With a Powder
Mr. T, 79, lives in assisted living and has a Stage 3 sacral pressure injury measuring 6.2 × 4.0 × 1.5 cm that has not changed in 8 weeks despite documented q2h repositioning and a properly functioning alternating-pressure mattress. The wound bed is clean and granulating. He eats about 40% of each meal and has lost 9 kg in 3 months; current weight is 52 kg, height 1.75 m. Albumin is 2.4 g/dL. A nephrology note from 3 years ago started him on a "renal diet," and he is not on dialysis. He has morphine 5 mg PO q4h PRN for wound pain and reports 8/10 during dressing changes; staff usually give it after the change "so it lasts longer." His family brings an unregulated collagen powder from the internet.
1. Assess his nutritional status, state what the albumin does and does not tell you, and set concrete targets.
Read the worked answer
Assessment
- BMI 17.0 (52 kg at 1.75 m) - underweight.
- 9 kg lost in 3 months from a baseline around 61 kg is roughly 15% - well past the threshold for severe unintentional weight loss (>5% in 1 month, >7.5% in 3 months).
- 40% meal intake corroborates it. This is protein-energy malnutrition, and it is sufficient by itself to explain a stalled Stage 3 injury with an otherwise clean bed and adequate pressure relief.
The albumin is being misread. At 2.4 g/dL it is a marker of inflammation and illness severity, not of protein intake. In a chronic wound patient with an open injury, albumin is a negative acute-phase reactant and will stay low regardless of how much protein you feed. Treat the weight trend and the intake record; do not chase the albumin number, and do not let anyone conclude "he's malnourished, so nothing will heal."
Targets
- Energy: ~30–35 kcal/kg/day → roughly 1,560–1,820 kcal/day.
- Protein: ~1.25–1.5 g/kg/day → roughly 65–78 g/day, appropriate for a Stage 3/4 pressure injury.
- Fluids, zinc, and a multivitamin to cover micronutrient needs; do not rely on megadose supplements.
- Dietitian referral and fortified meals plus 2–3 oral nutrition supplements between meals - food first, supplements to close the gap.
The renal diet is the actionable finding. A protein-restricted diet written 3 years ago for a non-dialysis patient is actively working against healing. Ask nephrology to revisit it; if there is no dialysis and no severe unmanaged renal failure, liberalize protein. This is a direct conflict between an old order and the current problem, and it needs to be named, not worked around.
2. Critique the analgesia plan and rewrite it for the dressing change.
Read the worked answer
What is wrong
The morphine is being given after the dressing change. That is backwards: the drug peaks well after the painful stimulus has ended, so he gets the side effects and misses the benefit, and he learns to dread each visit. An 8/10 during a predictable procedure is a treatable failure of planning, not an unavoidable feature of wound care.
Rewritten plan
- Premedicate 30–60 minutes before the dressing change with an agent chosen for onset, at a dose appropriate for an opioid-naive 79-year-old. Confirm the order allows pre-procedural timing; if it is written strictly as PRN q4h, get it clarified rather than improvising.
- Use the non-drug measures that reliably reduce pain: warm saline rather than cold, no adhesive tape on fragile skin, silicone-based atraumatic dressings, soak before removing anything stuck, gentle technique, and short procedures with rest breaks.
- Give him control - agree on a stop signal and honor it. Anticipatory anxiety amplifies pain, and predictability reduces it.
- Reassess with a validated scale before and after, and record both scores.
- Monitor for opioid harm in an older adult: sedation, constipation, confusion, and falls risk. If the premedication dose is inadequate at the current level, escalate the plan with the prescriber rather than stacking doses.
- Do not plan around "lasting longer" - match the drug to the event, and if background pain exists between changes, that is a separate conversation about scheduled analgesia.
3. The family asks whether the collagen powder will help and why the wound has not closed. Write your response and the documentation that follows it.
Read the worked answer
On the powder: be honest rather than dismissive. There is no reliable evidence that an unregulated collagen supplement closes pressure injuries, and the contents are not verified - which matters for a patient with renal disease, where unlisted protein, potassium, or phosphorus loads are a real hazard. Redirect the energy: the interventions with evidence here are total calories, total protein, and intake at meals. If they want to buy something, a verified oral nutrition supplement chosen with the dietitian is the better use of their money. Tell them you will ask the dietitian to review anything they bring in rather than having them guess.
On why it has not closed: name the actual barriers and separate them from the things that are already right.
- Offloading and the support surface are working - the bed is clean and granulating, so pressure and wound care are not the problem.
- The problem is fuel: 40% intake and 15% weight loss in 3 months. Tissue cannot be built without substrate.
- The old renal diet is likely contributing, and it is a fixable order.
- The pain plan has been making every dressing change worse than it needs to be.
Give a realistic timeline. A 6.2 × 4.0 × 1.5 cm Stage 3 injury takes months, not weeks; measurable progress means reduction in depth and slough, not closure. Set a review point rather than a promise, and revisit goals of care with the family if intake cannot be improved - a clean, stable, non-healing wound in a frail 79-year-old may be a maintenance goal rather than a healing goal, and that is a legitimate plan if it is chosen deliberately rather than by default.
Document: nutritional findings and weight trend, dietitian referral, the request to nephrology to reconsider the renal diet, the revised premedication plan and its effect, the family conversation with the specific teaching given, and the agreed review date.