Workday Pro HCM Core study materials
Workday Pro HCM Core study resources

Absence Plan Accrual and the Terminated Employee Payout

Workday Pro HCM Core · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Absence Plan Accrual and the Terminated Employee Payout

A company's paid time off plan accrues 1.67 days per month, capped at 25 days. Accruals are front-loaded on the first of each month for the full month. An employee resigns effective the 12th of the month after already receiving the full month's accrual on the 1st. The employee's balance at termination is 24 days. Company policy pays out unused PTO at termination, but the state requires payout of accrued, unused time and prohibits forfeiture of time already accrued. The HR admin processed the termination and the final paycheck was issued without a PTO payout because the system showed the accrual as 'already used in the current period.' Payroll is now reconciling.

1. Was the employee owed a PTO payout, and how should the front-loaded accrual be treated for the partial month?

Read the worked answer

Yes - the employee is owed a payout, and the front-loaded accrual is the crux.

Was time owed? The employee had 24 days accrued and unused at termination. The state prohibits forfeiture of accrued time, so the payout obligation exists regardless of the system's 'already used' flag. The flag is a system artifact, not a legal determination.

The partial-month question: The employee received a full month's accrual on the 1st but worked only 12 days. Two positions:

  • If the plan front-loads and the policy treats the accrual as earned on the 1st, the full month is accrued and payable.
  • If the plan prorates on termination, only 12/30 of the month is earned, and the unearned portion could be clawed back - but only if the plan documents that and state law permits it. Many states treat front-loaded PTO as earned on grant and prohibit recapture.

Correct action: Pay out the 24 days. Do not claw back the partial-month accrual unless the plan explicitly authorizes proration and state law allows it - verify both before adjusting. The conservative, compliant position is full payout.

2. What configuration change prevents this from recurring, and what is the reconciliation step for the already-issued paycheck?

Read the worked answer

Configuration fix: The 'already used in the current period' flag suggests the absence plan treats the front-loaded accrual as consumed by the current period rather than as an available balance. Correct the plan so that:

  • Accrual balance is available for payout at termination, not zeroed by period logic.
  • Termination processing triggers a payout calculation against the balance as of the termination date.
  • If the plan intends proration on termination, add an effective-dated proration rule so the balance reflects only earned time at the termination date.

Reconciliation: The final paycheck was issued without payout. Issue an off-cycle supplemental payment for the 24 days, coded as PTO payout, with the correct tax treatment for termination pay in that state. Do not reverse and reissue the original check if it has cleared - a supplemental payment is cleaner and preserves the audit trail. Document the correction and notify the employee. Then run a query for other terminations in the same period to check whether the same flag suppressed payouts elsewhere.