AA Advanced RPA flashcards
AA Advanced RPA · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- RPA vs AI decision rule
- Use RPA when decision logic is expressible as explicit rules on structured input; use AI when input is unstructured and labeled examples exist for training.
- Precision formula
- Precision equals true positives divided by the sum of true positives and false positives; it measures how often a positive prediction is correct.
- Recall formula
- Recall equals true positives divided by the sum of true positives and false negatives; it measures how many actual positives the model captures.
- Confidence threshold routing
- AI output above an upper threshold auto-processes, between thresholds goes to human review, and below a lower threshold is rejected or escalated.
- Human-in-the-loop design
- A pattern where the bot pauses and queues a work item for human review, then resumes with the reviewer's decision; required for regulated or high-value decisions.
- Straight-through processing rate
- STP rate equals transactions completed without human touch divided by total transactions; it is the primary throughput KPI for hybrid automation programs.
- Supervised learning prerequisite
- Supervised learning requires labeled training data mapping inputs to known outputs; without sufficient labeled examples, classification accuracy will be unreliable.
- Document understanding pipeline
- A chain combining OCR, layout analysis, and classification to extract structured fields from invoices, forms, and contracts for downstream processing.
- Process mining vs task mining
- Process mining reconstructs actual process flows from system event logs; task mining observes desktop events to identify candidate automation steps.
- Exception handling pattern
- Retry transient failures with exponential backoff, then route persistent failures to a queue with structured error context for human or bot remediation.
- Queue-based decoupling
- Producer bots enqueue work items and consumer bots process them, enabling horizontal scaling, load leveling, and isolation of failures per item.
- Attended vs unattended automation
- Attended bots are triggered within a user session; unattended bots run on servers via schedule or trigger; hybrid models hand off between them using queues.
- Stable selector strategy
- Prefer automation IDs and accessibility names over screen coordinates or index positions, which break when UI layout or ordering changes.
- Idempotency requirement
- Any bot that may retry must use a transaction ID or dedupe key so reprocessing the same item does not duplicate downstream effects.
- Process selection scoring factors
- Candidate processes are scored on volume, standardization, exception rate, cycle time, and regulatory risk; high-volume, low-variation, rules-based processes rank highest.
- Cognitive automation pipeline stages
- Ingest, extract via OCR, classify, validate against business rules, post to system of record, and log confidence and outcome for each transaction.
- Layered bot architecture
- Entry trigger, orchestrator for queues and workflow, reusable component library, connectors for UI/API/database, and logging telemetry layers.
- Bot state model
- States such as queued, in-progress, succeeded, business exception, and system exception persisted outside the bot process so restarts are safe.
- Secure configuration practice
- Credentials, endpoints, and thresholds belong in a secure config store; secrets go in a vault referenced by key and are never hardcoded.
- Required log fields
- Each log entry captures timestamp, transaction ID, step name, outcome, and error code; these feed operational dashboards and audit evidence.
- Deployment promotion path
- Dev to test/UAT to production with versioned packages and a rollback path; promotion requires passing regression test suites.
- Environment parity risk
- Screen resolution, locale, OS version, and application versions must match between test and production or selectors and timings break.
- Reusable component regression
- Shared components are unit-tested and versioned; changing one triggers regression testing across every bot that consumes it.
- Orchestrator core capabilities
- Queue management, credential vaulting, scheduling, bot health monitoring, and centralized audit logging are the baseline orchestrator functions.
- CoE operating models
- Centralized (CoE builds all), federated (business units build, CoE sets standards), and hybrid (CoE owns platform and reusable assets, BUs own pipelines).
- Governance gate sequence
- Intake and assessment, design review, build standards compliance, UAT sign-off, production release, and periodic health review.
- Bot inventory registry
- A registry capturing owner, criticality tier, dependencies, and last-reviewed date for every bot; the minimum control for a growing estate.
- Production change control
- Any change to a production bot requires a change request, impact assessment on dependent bots, and re-test evidence before release.
- Criticality tier monitoring
- Tier-1 bots that are customer-facing or financial get real-time alerting and on-call coverage; lower tiers get periodic review.
- Scaling metrics set
- Track pipeline conversion rate, bots in production, STP rate, exception rate, hours saved, and cost per transaction to measure program scale.
- Role separation in CoE
- Developers build, business analysts define requirements and process maps, and control functions review compliance; avoid one person owning all for critical bots.
- Capacity planning for scale
- Plan concurrent bot execution capacity, peak queue volumes, and orchestrator licensing before expanding the automation pipeline.