Delivery Driver, Two Auto Policies, and a Million-Dollar Umbrella
Parents have a personal auto policy with 100/300/100 liability and a $1 million umbrella. Their 22-year-old son lives at home, has his own auto policy with 50/100/50 limits, and drives the parents' minivan evenings and weekends for a food-delivery app. The parents did not list him as a driver on their PAP, though the policy has a permissive-use clause. While making a delivery, the son rear-ends a car, injuring two people; damages are estimated at $450,000. The parents' carrier denies liability coverage for the son's delivery use and points to the umbrella's underlying-insurance requirement. The son's own policy is primary for his use of a non-owned auto.
1. Determine which auto policy is primary and whether the parents' carrier's business-use denial is likely to hold.
Read the worked answer
The parents' PAP is primary for the minivan because it is the described auto. The son is a resident relative and likely an insured for permissive use, but the business-use exclusion for delivery for compensation is the carrier's basis to deny. That denial is likely enforceable if the policy excludes delivery for compensation and the son was actively delivering when the collision occurred. The son's own PAP covers him as an insured for a non-owned auto, but it probably contains the same delivery exclusion and has lower limits of 50/100/50. If neither policy applies, the parents' carrier may still owe a defense until a court resolves coverage. Practically, the son's policy is the likely primary source only if its delivery exclusion does not apply; otherwise the claim moves to the umbrella.
2. Does the $1 million umbrella respond, and what policy language controls?
Read the worked answer
The umbrella is not automatically available because the parents' PAP denied. An umbrella usually requires the scheduled underlying policy to respond, and it may drop down only if the underlying policy is exhausted by payment, not if it denies. Read the umbrella's maintenance-of-underlying-insurance provision, drop-down clause, self-insured retention, and exclusions. Many umbrellas also exclude business use of an auto, so the same delivery facts may bar the umbrella independently. If the son's policy pays its 50/100 limits but the parents' policy denies, the umbrella may fill the gap only if its drop-down language permits. The $450,000 claim exceeds the son's limits, so the umbrella is the only realistic source, but the agency should not assume it responds. Tender to the umbrella carrier with a written coverage position demand and request a defense.
3. What should the agency advise the family to do next, and what should the agency document?
Read the worked answer
Advise the family not to treat the denial as final. Request the parents' carrier's written coverage position citing the exact exclusion and policy language, preserve the son's own policy as primary or excess, and tender to the umbrella carrier. The agency should document the conversation, avoid giving a coverage opinion it cannot support, and remind the family that the failure to list the son as a driver is a separate underwriting issue from the delivery exclusion. The practical strategy is to confirm whether the son's policy will pay its limits, then pursue umbrella drop-down if the wording allows. If the parents' denial is disputed, the family may need coverage counsel; the agency should not promise a settlement outcome.