ABPath Hematopathology study plan
ABPath Hematopathology · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Methodology & Blood, bone marrow, and related disorders
Contrast the indications, specimen requirements, and interpretive limits of marrow aspirate, core biopsy, touch preparation, flow cytometry, karyotype, FISH, and sequencing
Match each routinely ordered stain (Wright-Giemsa, Prussian blue, reticulin, trichrome, PAS, immunohistochemistry) to the cellular or stromal feature it is meant to demonstrate
Construct a normal marrow differential worksheet that includes expected myeloid-to-erythroid ratios and age-related cellularity benchmarks
Apply a fixed scanning sequence to marrow biopsies covering cellularity, lineage topography, stroma, and pattern of infiltration
Identify the artifacts and hemodilution clues that most often cause a misinterpretation of marrow adequacy
Your checkpoint
A two-page reference table of marrow tests and stains (indication, specimen, artifact, pitfall) plus a written audit of 20 unknown morphology descriptions with a documented diagnostic reasoning chain for each
Blood, bone marrow, and related disorders & Hematopoiesis
Map the maturational sequence of erythroid, granulocytic, monocytic, and megakaryocytic lineages with the morphologic milestone at each stage
Assign CD marker expression patterns to each maturational stage and to the blasts of acute leukemias
Differentiate hypoplastic marrow from myelophthisic replacement using cellularity, fat content, and peripheral blood findings
Explain the stromal and cytokine requirements of normal hematopoiesis and predict which lineages fail first when marrow is injured
Recognize the marrow patterns of granulomatous disease, storage disorders, and metastatic nonhematopoietic tumor
Your checkpoint
One maturation ladder per lineage linking morphology, CD markers, and the leukemia phenotype that arises at that stage, validated by scoring at least 80% on a 15-question self-written recall test
Lymphoid disorders
Classify lymphoid neoplasms into the current WHO categories using morphology, immunophenotype, and genetic data together
Distinguish reactive lymphoid proliferations from neoplastic ones using architectural, cytologic, and clonality criteria
Interpret a lymphoid flow cytometry panel by assigning aberrancy from surface and cytoplasmic marker combinations
Predict the translocation or mutation expected for each major B-cell and T-cell neoplasm and state its diagnostic or prognostic role
Separate the small B-cell lymphomas from one another using a stepwise decision pathway
Your checkpoint
A 25-entity classification grid listing for each neoplasm its morphology, defining immunophenotype, sentinel genetics, and one common diagnostic mimic
Leukocyte disorders & Lymphoid disorders
Differentiate a leukemoid reaction, chronic myeloid leukemia, and other neutrophilias using the leukocyte alkaline phosphatase score, basophilia, and genetics
Interpret qualitative neutrophil abnormalities and relate them to functional defects in adhesion, oxidative killing, and granule release
Build a diagnostic approach to eosinophilia, monocytosis, and lymphocytosis that starts from the absolute count
Recognize the peripheral blood and marrow findings of inherited and acquired neutrophil disorders, including storage diseases and immunodeficiency syndromes
Rehearse mixed lymphoid and myeloid case stems under timed conditions
Your checkpoint
A timed 40-question mixed block scoring at least 75%, accompanied by an error log that names the failed discriminative feature for every missed item
Erythrocyte disorders & Platelets and platelet disorders
Sort anemias into production, maturation, and destruction categories using reticulocyte count, indices, and smear morphology
Select and sequence the confirmatory tests for suspected hemolysis, including direct antiglobulin testing, haptoglobin, and hemoglobin electrophoresis
Correlate red cell shapes (schistocytes, spherocytes, bite cells, teardrop cells) with the specific disorder each implies
Assess platelet number and size on smear and link giant or small platelets to inherited thrombocytopenias
Distinguish true thrombocytopenia from pseudothrombocytopenia and from plateleipenia caused by consumption, sequestration, or underproduction
Your checkpoint
Twelve written CBC-and-smear vignettes each ending in a single best diagnosis with the two findings that ruled out the closest alternative
Platelets and platelet disorders & Hemostasis and thrombosis
Interpret platelet function testing and von Willebrand studies in the context of mucocutaneous bleeding
Construct a mixing-study algorithm for a prolonged PT or PTT that separates factor deficiency from an inhibitor
Explain the laboratory strategy for detecting lupus anticoagulant and for evaluating inherited and acquired thrombophilia
Assign coagulation factor assays and inhibitor titers to the clinical scenarios that justify them
Differentiate immune thrombocytopenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, hemolytic uremic syndrome, and disseminated intravascular coagulation on laboratory grounds
Your checkpoint
A one-page decision algorithm for abnormal PT and PTT with mixing study, plus a 20-item coagulation interpretation set answered with the reasoning written out
Hemostasis and thrombosis & Patient care decision making and consultation
Monitor unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin and direct oral anticoagulants using the appropriate assay for each
Evaluate suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia using the pretest probability score, platelet factor 4 testing, and confirmatory activation assays
Formulate written responses to common hematology consultation questions about unexplained cytopenias, abnormal coagulation panels, and smear abnormalities
Apply test-utilization principles by declining low-yield orders and justifying each test requested
Integrate transfusion indications and blood product selection into periprocedural and bleeding-patient decisions
Your checkpoint
A consult response template plus ten written simulated consult answers, each stating the leading diagnosis, the next single best test, and the reasoning for excluding the alternative
Methodology & Hematopoiesis & Erythrocyte disorders & Leukocyte disorders & Lymphoid disorders & Blood, bone marrow, and related disorders & Platelets and platelet disorders & Hemostasis and thrombosis & Patient care decision making and consultation
Re-audit every error logged in weeks 1 through 7 and rewrite each as a discriminative rule
Assemble a consolidated one-page summary sheet of high-yield morphologic and laboratory discriminators across all domains
Complete a cumulative timed examination and stratify the misses by domain
Convert each weak domain into three targeted review questions answered without references
Rehearse time management by completing one block at examination pace
Your checkpoint
A full-length 100-question cumulative examination scored at or above 70%, plus a prioritized remediation list of no more than eight items with the specific action and review date for each
Milestones
Week 2: Can reproduce all four lineage maturation ladders from memory and score 80% or higher on the 15-question hematopoiesis recall test
Week 4: Complete the timed mixed block at 75% or higher with every missed item traced to a named discriminative feature in the error log
Week 6: Explain the mixing-study algorithm aloud in under three minutes and score at least 16 of 20 on the coagulation interpretation set
Week 8: Score 70% or higher on the cumulative 100-question examination and close out at least six of the eight remediation items