ABPath Hematopathology study materials
ABPath Hematopathology study resources

ABPath Hematopathology study plan

ABPath Hematopathology · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Methodology & Blood, bone marrow, and related disorders

  • Contrast the indications, specimen requirements, and interpretive limits of marrow aspirate, core biopsy, touch preparation, flow cytometry, karyotype, FISH, and sequencing

  • Match each routinely ordered stain (Wright-Giemsa, Prussian blue, reticulin, trichrome, PAS, immunohistochemistry) to the cellular or stromal feature it is meant to demonstrate

  • Construct a normal marrow differential worksheet that includes expected myeloid-to-erythroid ratios and age-related cellularity benchmarks

  • Apply a fixed scanning sequence to marrow biopsies covering cellularity, lineage topography, stroma, and pattern of infiltration

  • Identify the artifacts and hemodilution clues that most often cause a misinterpretation of marrow adequacy

Your checkpoint

A two-page reference table of marrow tests and stains (indication, specimen, artifact, pitfall) plus a written audit of 20 unknown morphology descriptions with a documented diagnostic reasoning chain for each

Week 2

Blood, bone marrow, and related disorders & Hematopoiesis

  • Map the maturational sequence of erythroid, granulocytic, monocytic, and megakaryocytic lineages with the morphologic milestone at each stage

  • Assign CD marker expression patterns to each maturational stage and to the blasts of acute leukemias

  • Differentiate hypoplastic marrow from myelophthisic replacement using cellularity, fat content, and peripheral blood findings

  • Explain the stromal and cytokine requirements of normal hematopoiesis and predict which lineages fail first when marrow is injured

  • Recognize the marrow patterns of granulomatous disease, storage disorders, and metastatic nonhematopoietic tumor

Your checkpoint

One maturation ladder per lineage linking morphology, CD markers, and the leukemia phenotype that arises at that stage, validated by scoring at least 80% on a 15-question self-written recall test

Week 3

Lymphoid disorders

  • Classify lymphoid neoplasms into the current WHO categories using morphology, immunophenotype, and genetic data together

  • Distinguish reactive lymphoid proliferations from neoplastic ones using architectural, cytologic, and clonality criteria

  • Interpret a lymphoid flow cytometry panel by assigning aberrancy from surface and cytoplasmic marker combinations

  • Predict the translocation or mutation expected for each major B-cell and T-cell neoplasm and state its diagnostic or prognostic role

  • Separate the small B-cell lymphomas from one another using a stepwise decision pathway

Your checkpoint

A 25-entity classification grid listing for each neoplasm its morphology, defining immunophenotype, sentinel genetics, and one common diagnostic mimic

Week 4

Leukocyte disorders & Lymphoid disorders

  • Differentiate a leukemoid reaction, chronic myeloid leukemia, and other neutrophilias using the leukocyte alkaline phosphatase score, basophilia, and genetics

  • Interpret qualitative neutrophil abnormalities and relate them to functional defects in adhesion, oxidative killing, and granule release

  • Build a diagnostic approach to eosinophilia, monocytosis, and lymphocytosis that starts from the absolute count

  • Recognize the peripheral blood and marrow findings of inherited and acquired neutrophil disorders, including storage diseases and immunodeficiency syndromes

  • Rehearse mixed lymphoid and myeloid case stems under timed conditions

Your checkpoint

A timed 40-question mixed block scoring at least 75%, accompanied by an error log that names the failed discriminative feature for every missed item

Week 5

Erythrocyte disorders & Platelets and platelet disorders

  • Sort anemias into production, maturation, and destruction categories using reticulocyte count, indices, and smear morphology

  • Select and sequence the confirmatory tests for suspected hemolysis, including direct antiglobulin testing, haptoglobin, and hemoglobin electrophoresis

  • Correlate red cell shapes (schistocytes, spherocytes, bite cells, teardrop cells) with the specific disorder each implies

  • Assess platelet number and size on smear and link giant or small platelets to inherited thrombocytopenias

  • Distinguish true thrombocytopenia from pseudothrombocytopenia and from plateleipenia caused by consumption, sequestration, or underproduction

Your checkpoint

Twelve written CBC-and-smear vignettes each ending in a single best diagnosis with the two findings that ruled out the closest alternative

Week 6

Platelets and platelet disorders & Hemostasis and thrombosis

  • Interpret platelet function testing and von Willebrand studies in the context of mucocutaneous bleeding

  • Construct a mixing-study algorithm for a prolonged PT or PTT that separates factor deficiency from an inhibitor

  • Explain the laboratory strategy for detecting lupus anticoagulant and for evaluating inherited and acquired thrombophilia

  • Assign coagulation factor assays and inhibitor titers to the clinical scenarios that justify them

  • Differentiate immune thrombocytopenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, hemolytic uremic syndrome, and disseminated intravascular coagulation on laboratory grounds

Your checkpoint

A one-page decision algorithm for abnormal PT and PTT with mixing study, plus a 20-item coagulation interpretation set answered with the reasoning written out

Week 7

Hemostasis and thrombosis & Patient care decision making and consultation

  • Monitor unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin and direct oral anticoagulants using the appropriate assay for each

  • Evaluate suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia using the pretest probability score, platelet factor 4 testing, and confirmatory activation assays

  • Formulate written responses to common hematology consultation questions about unexplained cytopenias, abnormal coagulation panels, and smear abnormalities

  • Apply test-utilization principles by declining low-yield orders and justifying each test requested

  • Integrate transfusion indications and blood product selection into periprocedural and bleeding-patient decisions

Your checkpoint

A consult response template plus ten written simulated consult answers, each stating the leading diagnosis, the next single best test, and the reasoning for excluding the alternative

Week 8

Methodology & Hematopoiesis & Erythrocyte disorders & Leukocyte disorders & Lymphoid disorders & Blood, bone marrow, and related disorders & Platelets and platelet disorders & Hemostasis and thrombosis & Patient care decision making and consultation

  • Re-audit every error logged in weeks 1 through 7 and rewrite each as a discriminative rule

  • Assemble a consolidated one-page summary sheet of high-yield morphologic and laboratory discriminators across all domains

  • Complete a cumulative timed examination and stratify the misses by domain

  • Convert each weak domain into three targeted review questions answered without references

  • Rehearse time management by completing one block at examination pace

Your checkpoint

A full-length 100-question cumulative examination scored at or above 70%, plus a prioritized remediation list of no more than eight items with the specific action and review date for each

Milestones

Week 2: Can reproduce all four lineage maturation ladders from memory and score 80% or higher on the 15-question hematopoiesis recall test

Week 4: Complete the timed mixed block at 75% or higher with every missed item traced to a named discriminative feature in the error log

Week 6: Explain the mixing-study algorithm aloud in under three minutes and score at least 16 of 20 on the coagulation interpretation set

Week 8: Score 70% or higher on the cumulative 100-question examination and close out at least six of the eight remediation items