Refusal of Psychiatric Follow-Up in a Client With Controlled Symptoms
Denise, 58, has bipolar I disorder and type 2 diabetes. She lives alone, manages her own medications, and has been stable for 14 months on lithium and metformin. Her lithium level last month was 0.7 mEq/L (therapeutic). At today's visit she reports sleeping 4 hours a night for the past week, has started three new craft businesses, and says she feels 'better than I have in years - I don't need the psychiatrist anymore.' She has stopped attending her monthly psychiatric appointments but continues her primary care visits. She denies hallucinations, has no suicidal or homicidal ideation, and is oriented and articulate. She is not a danger to self or others by any observable measure. She asks you to help her cancel the psychiatry referral and to sign a form saying she is 'fully independent.'
1. How should the case manager interpret the combination of decreased sleep, increased goal-directed activity, and subjective well-being in this client?
Read the worked answer
These are classic early warning signs of hypomania/mania: reduced need for sleep (not insomnia - she feels rested), increased goal-directed activity (three new businesses), and elevated mood with impaired insight ('better than in years'). Subjective well-being is not reassurance; euphoria with decreased sleep is a red flag, not a sign of recovery.
Crucially, she does not meet criteria for emergency intervention: no psychosis, no SI/HI, intact orientation, and she is caring for herself. The CM's task is to escalate concern through engagement and safety planning, not through coercive measures that aren't justified.
Judgment: distinguish 'not an emergency' from 'no concern.' Both are true here.
2. Denise asks the case manager to cancel psychiatry and sign an independence form. What is the appropriate response, and why?
Read the worked answer
The CM should decline to cancel the psychiatric relationship and decline to sign any statement of 'full independence' that misrepresents clinical status. Reasoning:
- Signing would substitute the CM's judgment for the treating psychiatrist's and could facilitate decompensation.
- The CM can honor autonomy by not forcing treatment, but cannot affirmatively certify stability she cannot verify.
Constructive alternative: propose a negotiated compromise - keep the next psychiatry appointment as a 'check-in' rather than ongoing therapy, and agree to revisit frequency if she remains stable for 8 weeks. Frame it as protecting her businesses: 'Let's make sure the sleep change doesn't derail what you're building.' Use motivational interviewing rather than confrontation.
3. What concrete safety and monitoring steps should the case manager put in place given Denise lives alone?
Read the worked answer
- Written early-warning plan with Denise: sleep hours, spending, irritability, and a named contact who will call the CM if she stops sleeping.
- Medication adherence check: confirm she is still taking lithium; a manic episode can include stopping mood stabilizers. Ask directly and offer a pill organizer or pharmacy sync.
- Lithium level recheck coordinated with primary care within 1–2 weeks, since dehydration or dose changes can shift levels.
- Warm handoff to psychiatry: ask Denise's permission for the CM to send a brief note to the psychiatrist describing the sleep and activity changes so the psychiatrist can decide on outreach.
- Crisis plan: 988 and local mobile crisis number written down, with criteria for when to use them.
Judgment: least-restrictive monitoring that respects autonomy while creating tripwires.