Skilled Nursing Authorization Denial Mid-Stay
Rosa, 79, was admitted to a skilled nursing facility after a hip fracture repair. She has Medicare Part A and a Medicare Advantage plan through a private insurer. On day 14 the plan issues a denial for continued skilled care, stating she has 'plateaued' and can transition to home. Rosa lives alone in a second-floor walk-up with no elevator. She uses a walker and cannot yet negotiate stairs; her daughter lives 90 minutes away and works full time. The facility therapist's note from yesterday documents that Rosa still requires moderate assistance for transfers and has not been assessed on stairs. The denial notice was dated Friday and arrived Saturday; today is Monday. Rosa tells you she 'doesn't want to be a burden' and is willing to go home.
1. What must the case manager verify about the denial notice, and why does the timing matter?
Read the worked answer
The CM must confirm the notice meets Medicare Advantage requirements: a written denial that states the specific reasons, the date coverage ends, and explicit appeal rights including the expedited appeal process and the deadline. For a Medicare Advantage plan, a service termination notice generally must be given at least two calendar days before the proposed end of coverage, and the enrollee has the right to an expedited (fast) appeal - typically a decision within 72 hours - and can request that services continue during the appeal.
The Friday-dated/Saturday-received timing is a red flag: if the notice did not give the required advance notice, Rosa's appeal rights and continued-stay protections may be affected. The CM should document receipt date and request the plan's file.
Judgment: the CM doesn't just accept the denial - she audits the process because procedural defects are appealable.
2. Rosa's therapist documents ongoing skilled need. How should the case manager build the appeal, and what evidence is most persuasive?
Read the worked answer
The CM should file an expedited appeal immediately (today) and request continued stay pending appeal. Persuasive evidence:
- Therapy notes showing skilled, measurable need: moderate assist for transfers, no stair assessment, specific goals not yet met. 'Plateau' is contradicted by documented ongoing functional deficits.
- A statement of the home environment: second-floor walk-up, lives alone, no caregiver in the home - establishing that discharge to home is not safe without stair competency.
- A physician order/letter from the attending supporting continued skilled care.
- A specific projected discharge date and plan once stair training is complete - showing the request is time-limited, not open-ended.
Frame the appeal around skilled need and safety, not convenience. Avoid arguing 'she has nowhere to go'; argue 'she has an unmet skilled need that home cannot safely address.'
3. Rosa says she doesn't want to be a burden and is willing to go home unsafely. How should the case manager respond?
Read the worked answer
The CM should take the statement seriously as a values statement, not as informed consent to an unsafe discharge. Steps:
- Explore the meaning - is she worried about cost, her daughter's time, or feeling like a problem? Name it directly.
- Separate her preference from the safety assessment: her willingness to go home does not make a second-floor walk-up with a walker safe; document her preference and the clinical risks side by side.
- Offer concrete burden-reducers: home health aide, meal delivery, a temporary ground-floor arrangement, or a family call to the daughter (with Rosa's permission) to share the load.
- Do not pressure or override; if she insists on discharge, document the informed refusal, provide the appeal information anyway, and set up a safety plan with follow-up calls.
Judgment: respect autonomy while refusing to let 'I don't want to be a burden' silently become the discharge plan.