CIAQM flashcards
CIAQM · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Quality management definition
- Coordinated activities to direct and control an organization with respect to quality, encompassing quality planning, quality control, quality assurance, and quality improvement.
- PDCA cycle
- Deming's Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle: set objectives and processes, implement them, monitor and measure results against requirements, then standardize or correct.
- Juran quality trilogy
- Three managerial processes: quality planning (design for quality), quality control (meet quality goals during operations), and quality improvement (raise performance to new levels).
- Crosby conformance definition
- Crosby defined quality as conformance to requirements, measured by the cost of nonconformance, with zero defects as the performance standard.
- Cost of quality categories
- Prevention and appraisal costs are conformance costs; internal and external failure costs are nonconformance costs. Total cost of quality sums all four categories.
- Seven quality principles
- ISO 9001 principles: customer focus, leadership, engagement of people, process approach, improvement, evidence-based decision making, and relationship management.
- Process approach
- Managing activities as interrelated processes with defined inputs, outputs, controls, and resources so that interactions are understood and results are consistent and predictable.
- CAE quality responsibility
- The chief audit executive is accountable for developing, maintaining, and resourcing the internal audit activity's quality management and assurance program.
- Standard 1100 requirement
- The CAE must develop and maintain a quality assurance and improvement program that covers all aspects of the internal audit activity and continuously monitors effectiveness.
- Engagement-level quality control
- Supervision, working paper review, and evidence standards applied during each engagement to confirm planning, fieldwork, and reporting meet the Standards before issuance.
- Annual independence confirmation
- The CAE must confirm to senior management and the board annually that the internal audit activity is organizationally independent and free from interference.
- Independence versus objectivity
- Independence is the organizational freedom from conditions threatening objectivity; objectivity is an unbiased mental attitude in performing engagements and forming judgments.
- QAIP scope
- The quality assurance and improvement program covers all aspects of the internal audit activity's operations, not merely individual engagements or report quality.
- QAIP core components
- Internal assessments (ongoing monitoring plus periodic self-assessments), external assessments, and reporting and follow-up on assessment results and improvement actions.
- Ongoing monitoring
- Continuous, day-to-day supervision, review, and measurement of engagements performed by the audit activity itself as part of internal assessments.
- Periodic self-assessment
- A structured review conducted at planned intervals, usually annually, evaluating the audit activity's conformance with the Standards and its own policies.
- QAIP action plan
- A documented plan assigning responsibility and timelines to correct deficiencies identified by assessments, with monitoring to verify remediation is effective.
- QAIP documentation
- Records of QAIP design, monitoring activities, assessment results, and remediation must be retained to support the CAE's annual conformance conclusion.
- Internal assessment frequency
- Internal assessments must be performed at least annually, and results reported to senior management and the board as part of QAIP reporting.
- External assessment interval
- An external assessment must be conducted at least once every five years by a qualified, independent assessor or team from outside the organization.
- External assessment methods
- Either a full external assessment by an outside team or a self-assessment with independent external validation satisfies the five-year external assessment requirement.
- External assessor independence
- Assessors must have no conflict of interest and no obligation to or affiliation with the organization or its internal audit activity that could impair judgment.
- External assessor competence
- Assessors must be knowledgeable in internal auditing and the IIA Standards and competent to evaluate the activity's conformance objectively.
- Generally conforms opinion
- An external assessment opinion indicating the activity meets the intent of all Standards, with only minor deficiencies that do not impair overall effectiveness.
- Partially conforms opinion
- An external assessment opinion indicating the activity meets the intent of some but not all applicable Standards, with deficiencies requiring corrective action.
- Does not conform opinion
- An external assessment opinion indicating significant deficiencies prevent the activity from meeting the intent of one or more Standards and impair its effectiveness.
- QAIP reporting audience
- Results of internal and external assessments must be reported to senior management and the board, including scope, conclusions, and nonconformance with Standards.
- Nonconformance disclosure
- The CAE must disclose nonconformance with the Code of Ethics or Standards that affects the activity's conclusions or operations, escalating it to the board.
- Continuous improvement loop
- Measure performance, identify deficiencies, plan and implement corrective action, verify results, and re-measure, repeating the cycle within the QAIP.
- Annual conformance statement
- The CAE's annual report states whether the internal audit activity conforms with the Code of Ethics and Standards, supported by QAIP evidence.
- Deficiency tracking to closure
- Identified deficiencies are logged, assigned owners and due dates, monitored, and re-reported if remediation slips or remains unresolved.
- Tailored QAIP communication
- Reporting is scaled to the audience: detailed operational findings for management and summarized governance conclusions for the board, both timely and objective.