ACHPN study plan
ACHPN · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Pain Assessment and Management
Classify pain by mechanism (nociceptive, neuropathic, mixed) and match each classification to an appropriate analgesic strategy
Perform equianalgesic conversions among morphine, oxycodone, hydromorphone, and transdermal fentanyl, applying a 25-50% reduction for incomplete cross-tolerance when rotating opioids
Construct a titration plan for severe acute pain that includes a breakthrough dose equal to 10-20% of the 24-hour baseline
Recognize and outline management of opioid adverse effects including constipation, sedation, myoclonus, and opioid-induced neurotoxicity
Select adjuvant analgesics for neuropathic pain, bone pain, and visceral pain, stating the rationale for each
Your checkpoint
A one-page equianalgesic conversion and titration reference card built from memory, validated against a primary pharmacology source, plus a 25-item self-quiz scored at 80% or higher
Non-Pain Symptom Assessment and Management
Assess and grade dyspnea and initiate a stepwise plan that includes nonpharmacologic measures and low-dose opioids
Select an antiemetic by matching the patient's presenting pattern to the affected emetic pathway (chemotherapy, vestibular, gastric stasis, raised intracranial pressure)
Design a prophylactic bowel regimen for any patient starting an opioid and adjust it for inadequate response
Screen for delirium with a validated tool, list reversible contributors, and prescribe a nonpharmacologic-first management plan
Differentiate depression, anxiety, and existential distress in a seriously ill patient and state a first-line treatment for each
Your checkpoint
A symptom-management decision table covering dyspnea, nausea, constipation, delirium, and depression/anxiety, with first-line and rescue options for each, self-tested by written case vignettes
Communication, Goals-of-Care Discussions, and Advance Care Planning
Conduct a structured goals-of-care conversation that elicits the patient's values, illness understanding, and acceptable functional outcomes before discussing specific treatments
Deliver news of a poor prognosis using a stepwise protocol and respond to emotional cues with empathic statements rather than immediate problem-solving
Explain the scope, limitations, and portability of advance directives, living wills, and portable medical orders for life-sustaining treatment
Facilitate a family meeting with a defined pre-meeting, meeting, and debrief structure, including management of conflict
Document a goals-of-care discussion so that a covering clinician could act on the documented preferences without clarifying calls
Your checkpoint
A written transcript or recording of a role-played goals-of-care conversation, critiqued against a 10-item communication checklist, with the corresponding ACP documentation note drafted
Psychosocial, Cultural, and Spiritual Care & Interdisciplinary Team Collaboration and Palliative Care Practice Models
Screen for psychosocial distress using a validated instrument and triage findings to social work, psychology, or chaplaincy
Distinguish normal grief from major depression and from demoralization, and state the referral threshold for each
Perform a spiritual assessment that identifies sources of meaning, belief, and ritual, and document it in a form the team can act on
Adapt communication and care planning for cultural and health-literacy differences, including interpreter use
Describe the roles and referral triggers for each core interdisciplinary team member (physician, nurse, social worker, chaplain, aide, therapist, pharmacist)
Your checkpoint
A cumulative 100-item practice examination covering the pain, symptom, and communication domains, scored at 75% or higher with an error log of missed concepts
Interdisciplinary Team Collaboration and Palliative Care Practice Models & Care of the Patient at End of Life and After-Death Care
Run an interdisciplinary team meeting that produces documented, owner-assigned problem-based care plan updates
Apply hospice eligibility criteria and prognostication tools to determine appropriateness and recertification readiness for a given patient
Identify the clinical signs of actively dying and prescribe an end-of-life symptom plan for pain, dyspnea, secretions, and agitation
Distinguish palliative sedation from euthanasia and articulate the doctrine of double effect in a clinical scenario
Explain the process and ethical reasoning for withdrawing a life-sustaining intervention such as dialysis or ventilation
Your checkpoint
A complete interdisciplinary care plan for a simulated actively dying patient, including a written end-of-life order set and a two-paragraph justification of the sedation-versus-euthanasia distinction
Care of the Patient at End of Life and After-Death Care & Grief, Loss, and Bereavement Support
Perform post-death care procedures including pronouncement documentation, family notification, and culturally appropriate body care
Complete required post-death documentation including death certificate cause-of-death entries and hospice discharge documentation
Administer a validated bereavement risk assessment and stratify survivors into universal, targeted, or specialized support
Design a bereavement follow-up schedule for a hospice family across the first 13 months, including the components of a condolence contact
Identify complicated grief criteria and state the referral pathway and evidence-supported treatment
Your checkpoint
A bereavement care plan template for one simulated family, including a risk-assessment score, a 13-month contact schedule, and referral criteria for complicated grief
Ethical, Legal, and Regulatory Issues in Hospice and Palliative Care & Education, Quality Improvement, Leadership, and Research Utilization
Apply the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice to capacity, surrogate decision-making, and confidentiality scenarios
Differentiate the regulatory requirements of the Medicare hospice benefit including election, revocation, levels of care, and recertification
Design a small quality-improvement project using a measurable indicator, a data source, and a PDSA cycle
Appraise a palliative care research article for study design, bias, and applicability to practice, and translate one finding into a practice change
Explain how to teach a symptom-assessment skill to a colleague using a learner-centered approach with an evaluation component
Your checkpoint
A two-page quality-improvement proposal for one measurable indicator (for example, percentage of patients with a documented goals-of-care conversation within 48 hours of admission) with a data-collection plan and PDSA cycle
Pain Assessment and Management & Non-Pain Symptom Assessment and Management & Communication, Goals-of-Care Discussions, and Advance Care Planning & Psychosocial, Cultural, and Spiritual Care & Interdisciplinary Team Collaboration and Palliative Care Practice Models & Care of the Patient at End of Life and After-Death Care & Grief, Loss, and Bereavement Support & Ethical, Legal, and Regulatory Issues in Hospice and Palliative Care & Education, Quality Improvement, Leadership, and Research Utilization
Complete a timed full-length practice examination under test-day conditions and score each domain separately
Re-study the two lowest-scoring domains using the error log and targeted primary sources
Rehearse rapid recall of high-yield numbers, equianalgesic ratios, screening tools, and regulatory timeframes
Assemble a one-page summary sheet of personally missed concepts for final pre-exam review
Your checkpoint
A timed full-length practice examination scored by domain with a written remediation note for every domain below 75% and a completed one-page high-yield summary sheet
Milestones
Week 2: Correctly complete 10 opioid conversions and 5 symptom-management vignettes without reference material, at 90% accuracy
Week 4: Score 75% or higher on the 100-item cumulative practice exam covering the pain, symptom, and communication domains, with an error log completed
Week 6: Produce an end-of-life order set and a bereavement plan that a supervising clinician judges safe and complete on first review, with no required corrections to clinical content
Week 8: Score 75% or higher on every domain of the full-length timed practice examination and below 10% on the personal high-yield summary review