The thriving 4-year-old with a murmur and a fixed split second sound
A 4-year-old girl is brought to a general paediatric clinic for a routine check. She is asymptomatic, plays normally, and is at the 50th centile for height and weight. Her mother reports no cyanosis, squatting, or exercise limitation. On examination there is a grade 2/6 ejection systolic murmur at the left upper sternal edge, and the second heart sound is split and does not vary with respiration. The femoral pulses are normal and equal. Blood pressure is normal in all four limbs. There is no hepatomegaly or oedema. A 12-lead ECG shows an rSR' pattern in V1 with a QRS duration of 110 ms and right-axis deviation. The parents ask whether she needs surgery and whether she can continue swimming lessons.
1. What is the likely diagnosis, and how do the examination and ECG findings fit together?
Read the worked answer
The likely diagnosis is an atrial septal defect (secundum type).
- Fixed, widely split S2 is the key sign: the left-to-right shunt equalises the respiratory pressure changes in both atria, so the pulmonary component does not move with respiration. This is the finding that distinguishes an ASD from physiological splitting.
- Ejection systolic murmur at the left upper sternal edge reflects increased flow across the pulmonary valve (not across the defect itself - ASDs are characteristically silent at the defect).
- ECG: an rSR' in V1 with right-axis deviation indicates right ventricular volume overload and is typical of a secundum ASD. A primum ASD would more often show left-axis deviation and a superior frontal plane.
- The child is asymptomatic and thriving, which is typical; symptoms (exercise intolerance, recurrent chest infections, arrhythmia) usually emerge in the second or third decade.
The murmur of a small muscular VSD would be holosystolic and lower down; a pulmonary stenosis murmur would radiate to the back with an ejection click and a variable split.
2. What is the role of echocardiography, and how would you counsel the parents about the need for intervention and about swimming?
Read the worked answer
Echocardiography confirms the diagnosis, defines the defect's size and rims (to judge suitability for device closure), quantifies right ventricular volume loading, estimates pulmonary artery pressure, and excludes associated anomalies (anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, cleft mitral valve). It is the definitive test and should be done in a paediatric cardiology setting.
Counseling:
- Closure is generally indicated for a haemodynamically significant ASD (right heart enlargement, left-to-right shunt with Qp:Qs >1.5, or any symptoms), typically performed electively between about 3 and 5 years of age - before school entry and before pulmonary vascular disease becomes a concern. Small defects (<5 mm) may be observed for spontaneous closure.
- Device closure via cardiac catheterisation is preferred for suitable secundum defects; surgery is reserved for large defects, inadequate rims, or primum defects.
- Untreated large defects risk atrial arrhythmias, pulmonary hypertension and paradoxical embolism in adulthood, so closure is not merely cosmetic.
- Swimming: she can continue swimming lessons now, as she is asymptomatic with no cyanosis or exercise limitation. There is no restriction at this stage; after device closure most centres impose a short period (usually a few weeks to a few months) of avoidance of strenuous activity while the device endothelialises, and she should be reviewed before resuming competitive swimming. Advise the family to seek review if she develops breathlessness, palpitations, or recurrent chest infections.