Six Tenors and One High G
A high school concert choir of 42 meets twice weekly for 45 minutes; the winter concert is five weeks out. The roster: 14 sopranos, 11 altos, 11 basses, and 6 tenors. Of the tenors, two are true tenors, three are baritones singing up, and one, Marcus, is a bass-baritone whose comfortable top is E4. The program includes a Romantic part-song with a tenor divisi that sits on G4 for three measures at mezzo-forte and requires a crescendo into the phrase. The choir is already bottom-heavy in balance. The accompanist is a student who reads well but transposes slowly. Options on the table: transpose down a minor third, cut the divisi, reassign Marcus to the upper line, or replace the piece.
1. Evaluate the four options. Which do you pursue first, and on what grounds?
Read the worked answer
The key distinction is range versus tessitura versus dynamic demand. G4 is inside Marcus's range, but three sustained bars at mezzo-forte with a crescendo is a tessitura demand at the very top of his usable range. That is a fatigue and intonation problem, not a “can he hit it” problem, and it will surface late in the concert rather than in the rehearsal room.
- Reassign Marcus to the upper line: worsens the problem. Reject.
- Keep the divisi as written: the lower line will sag and go flat at the crescendo, and the intonation failure will be audible because the basses are strong and the texture is exposed.
- Cut the divisi: cheapest and preserves key. Check first whether the second line doubles the first at the unison in places; if it does, the cut is nearly invisible.
- Transpose down a minor third: fixes the tenor and may break the sopranos or push the bass line below the section's floor; also the accompanist cannot transpose fluently.
- Replace the piece: highest cost this late, but honest if the section genuinely cannot carry the program.
Pursue the cut first, with a two-rehearsal trial. It is the only option that addresses the actual demand without redistributing risk to another section.
2. Suppose the cut proves musically unacceptable. How do you analyze the transposition before committing?
Read the worked answer
Do not evaluate the transposition from the tenor part. Build a whole-ensemble picture:
- Extremes by section. For each voice, list the highest and lowest note after transposition and compare to what that section has already sung this term. A minor third down may fix the tenors and put the basses on a floor they have never sustained.
- Accompaniment. The student accompanist cannot transpose at sight. Either the part is rewritten in the new key (real work, but finite) or the option is effectively dead. Transposing a piece with an orchestral reduction also risks a muddy key.
- Program context. Check the keys of the adjacent pieces; a minor third down may land the work next to another in the same key, flattening the concert's tonal shape.
- Soloists and divisi. Confirm the soprano divisi and any solo lines still sit well. Fixing one section by breaking another is not a solution.
If the analysis shows collateral damage, the honest conclusion is that the piece is wrong for this ensemble this year, and the repertoire decision - not the tenors - was the error. Say so plainly rather than blaming the section.
3. What evidence would you collect in the next two rehearsals to decide, and by when must you decide?
Read the worked answer
Decide by the end of rehearsal four, leaving three weeks to learn a replacement if needed. Evidence plan:
- Test in context, not in isolation. Run the passage inside the full piece after the choir is warm, then again at the very end of a 45-minute rehearsal to simulate concert fatigue. A passage that works cold and fails tired is a failed passage.
- Listen for the specific failure mode. Not wrong notes but flatting through the crescendo and a thinning lower line. Record the run and listen back with the section present; singers hear the problem faster from a recording.
- Check the approach. If the tenor line arrives at the G4 by leap, the intonation risk is higher than by step. That affects whether any rehearsal fix is plausible.
- Compare configurations. Run the cut version and the as-written version on alternate days so the comparison is not confounded by warming up.
Write the decision and its rationale down on the day you make it. A late repertoire change made without a record looks like poor planning; the same change made with evidence looks like good judgment.