A Village Clinic and a Fever Outbreak
A clinic serving 1,200 people sees 40 new fever cases in one week; normally it sees about 5. Most patients report sudden high fever, headache, and muscle aches. A few have a faint rash. The village sits beside a slow-moving irrigation canal, and it is late summer. No deaths have occurred. A health worker wants to declare a 'typhoid outbreak' and start chlorinating all drinking water. Another worker notes that malaria and dengue are also possible in this setting. Rapid tests for malaria are available; dengue testing requires sending samples to a district lab with a 3-day turnaround.
1. List the features that point toward and against each of the three candidate diagnoses (typhoid, malaria, dengue), and identify what single test would most efficiently narrow the field first.
Read the worked answer
Typhoid: For - fever, headache, muscle aches; contaminated water is plausible near an irrigation canal. Against - typhoid usually builds fever gradually ('step-ladder'), often with abdominal symptoms; a rash (rose spots) is faint and uncommon; explosive one-week clustering with no obvious water event is less typical.
Malaria: For - standing water near the canal breeds Anopheles; late summer; sudden high fever, headache, muscle aches are classic. Against - a rash is not typical of malaria.
Dengue: For - Aedes mosquitoes breed in stored water around homes; sudden high fever, headache, muscle aches, and a faint rash fit well. Against - dengue often brings severe joint/bone pain and a rash that appears as fever breaks.
Most efficient first test: the rapid malaria test, because it is available on-site, gives an answer in minutes, and can rule malaria in or out immediately. Sending dengue samples (3-day delay) should follow if malaria tests are negative.
2. The health worker wants to chlorinate all drinking water immediately. Evaluate this action using the available evidence.
Read the worked answer
Chlorination is cheap, safe, and prevents waterborne disease regardless of the diagnosis, so it is reasonable as a low-regret protective measure - but it should not be presented as confirmation of typhoid.
The evidence does not yet single out a waterborne cause. If the illness is mosquito-borne (malaria or dengue), chlorination will not stop transmission; vector control (removing standing water, bed nets, repellent) would be needed. Judgement point: act on precautionary measures that are harmless and broadly protective, while withholding the causal claim until testing supports it. Declaring 'typhoid outbreak' publicly before testing could misdirect resources and cause alarm.
3. If malaria rapid tests come back negative for most patients, what is the most likely next step and what data would you collect?
Read the worked answer
With malaria largely excluded, dengue becomes the leading hypothesis, so send samples to the district lab and begin mosquito-control measures targeting Aedes (empty or cover stored-water containers, clear larval habitats near homes).
Data to collect: onset dates (to build an epidemic curve), whether cases cluster by household or by water source, age distribution, presence of rash and its timing, recent travel, and whether stored-water containers are common. Comparing attack rates among people using different water sources would test the typhoid hypothesis; mapping households against standing water would test the mosquito hypotheses.