HN-BC study materials
HN-BC study resources

The Patient Who Says He Is Done: Capacity, Surrogacy, and Moral Distress

HN-BC · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Patient Who Says He Is Done: Capacity, Surrogacy, and Moral Distress

Mr. R, 68, is admitted for the fourth time in six months with a COPD exacerbation (FEV1 32% predicted). He tells you he is "done with the vent" and wants comfort-focused care only. His daughter, who holds his durable power of attorney for healthcare, insists he is "just depressed" and demands full treatment. The intensivist asks you to "talk him into" a BiPAP trial. His PHQ-9 is 14; on the MMSE he scores 26/30-oriented to person and place, not date. He mentions using a neighbor's leftover prednisone and seeing a "healing touch" practitioner weekly. He then asks you whether you think he is "giving up on God."

1. Identify the ethical tensions in this situation and describe, step by step, how a holistic nurse would proceed before any treatment decision is made.

Read the worked answer

Name the tensions separately, because they pull in different directions

  • Self-determination vs. beneficence: Mr. R is expressing a considered preference; staff read his depression and hypoxia as distorting that preference. Both readings can be partly true.
  • Surrogate authority limits: A durable power of attorney for healthcare is a substituted-judgment role, not a substitute for the patient's own decisions while he retains capacity. The daughter can speak for him when he cannot-not over him when he can.
  • Role conflict for you: The intensivist's request to "talk him into" BiPAP asks you to persuade rather than assess. Accepting that framing would compromise informed consent and is a legitimate source of moral distress.

Sequence of actions

  1. Assess capacity on the decision at hand, not globally. Can he state the choice, the consequences, the alternatives, and apply them to himself consistently? Disorientation to date alone does not establish incapacity for a treatment decision; severe hypoxia and depression do not automatically either, but they require a repeat assessment when his CO2 and oxygenation are closest to baseline.
  2. Separate depression treatment from decision-making. A PHQ-9 of 14 is moderate depression and warrants treatment and reassessment. Treating it does not require overriding him, and it is also not proof he is incapable.
  3. Clarify what "done with the vent" means. Patients often mean "do not leave me on it indefinitely." Ask what a good day would look like, what he would accept as a time-limited trial, and what he fears most. A time-limited BiPAP trial with explicit stopping criteria may satisfy both his goal and the team's-but only if he frames it.
  4. Facilitate a family meeting with the daughter, palliative care, and the intensivist, where the daughter hears his own words. Screen her grief and caregiver burden; her resistance is often anticipatory loss, not bad faith.
  5. Escalate, do not obstruct. Request an ethics consult and document capacity findings and his stated goals verbatim.
  6. Name your own distress in a debrief or peer support channel; unprocessed moral distress degrades the care you give the next patient.

2. How would you respond to his spiritual question and to his use of healing touch and borrowed prednisone, without either endorsing or dismissing any of it?

Read the worked answer

Spiritual question

Do not answer the theology. Reflect the meaning back and let him be the authority on his own faith:

"You're asking whether stopping aggressive treatment would be a betrayal of your faith. That's a heavy thing to be carrying at 2 a.m. Tell me what your faith has meant to you in these hospital stays."

Then assess: Is this spiritual distress (guilt, fear of abandonment, unresolved relationships)? Offer a chaplain referral as a resource, not a prescription, and honor refusal. Distress of this kind often shifts what a patient wants-so it belongs in the goals-of-care conversation, not outside it.

Healing touch

A holistic nurse practices with the patient's meaning system. Ask what the sessions do for him (sleep? pain? anxiety? a sense of control?), whether he has told his team, and whether he wants it continued in hospital per policy on volunteer practitioners. Non-endorsement is not the same as dismissal: "I'm glad something is helping you sleep. Let's make sure the team knows so nothing conflicts." Protect the practice from being presented as a substitute for bronchodilators or oxygen.

Borrowed prednisone

This is a safety issue and must be documented and reported to the prescriber, not moralized about. Explore the driver-cost, access, refill gaps-because the fix is usually pharmacy assistance or a 90-day supply, not a lecture. Frame it as partnership: "Steroid bursts without a plan can make your breathing worse over time. Can we get you a prescription you can actually fill?"

3. Within the next 24 hours, what will you document and what will you advocate for? Distinguish what is your obligation from what is optional.

Read the worked answer

Non-negotiable documentation

  • Verbatim statements of his goals and preferences, with the date/time and who was present-quotes travel further than paraphrases in an ethics dispute.
  • Results of your capacity assessment (the four elements, not a label), and the conditions under which it was done.
  • The intensivist's request and your response to it.
  • Surrogate identity, documentation of the DPOAHC, and the daughter's stated position.
  • Medications used outside the plan of care, including the borrowed prednisone and the healing touch visits.
  • Spiritual distress and any referral offered/declined.

Advocacy asks

  1. Palliative care consult today, not after the next intubation.
  2. A time-limited trial discussion with the daughter present, using his own words.
  3. Pharmacy and social work review for cost-related nonadherence.
  4. Ethics consult if the team's plan and his stated wish diverge.

What is optional but valuable

  • A self-care/debrief action for you.
  • Asking the chaplain to round with you.

Reasoning anchor: your duty is to ensure the decision is made by the right person with the right information. You are not required to produce the "correct" outcome, and you should not accept a role that makes you an instrument of someone else's preferred outcome.