ALOA ICRL study plan
ALOA ICRL · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Institutional Door Hardware and Locking Devices
Name and label the major mechanical lock families (cylindrical/bored, mortise, rim, tubular, deadbolt, padlock) and state which cylinder formats each accepts
Trace the force path through a bored cylindrical lockset from knob to latchbolt, naming each component and its failure point
Distinguish the common pin-tumbler cylinder types (screw-in, key-in-knob, mortise, rim, interchangeable core) and list where each is specified
Write your own definitions for 60 hardware and locking terms instead of copying a glossary
Your checkpoint
A hand-drawn, fully labeled diagram of one cylindrical lockset and one mortise lock body, plus a 60-term self-written glossary; pass an open-book labeling quiz at 80% or better
Institutional Door Hardware and Locking Devices
Match BHMA grade levels and ANSI function numbers to the applications where each is appropriate
Determine handing and swing direction for six different door conditions, including reverse-bevel and double-egress pairs
Select and adjust a surface closer so the door closes and latches against air pressure and latching resistance
Compare electric strike types (fail safe, fail secure, solenoid, continuous duty) and the frames each fits
Identify finish codes and their durability implications for high-traffic openings
Your checkpoint
A hardware schedule for a hypothetical 10-door building listing function, grade, finish, handing, and closing force basis for every opening
Master Keying and Key Control Systems
Compute MACS-compliant cuts for given depth-and-space progressions and flag violations in flawed sample charts
Build a three-level keying hierarchy (grand master, master, change keys) with complete pin stacks for at least 12 change keys
Explain two-step progression and the rotate-constant rule well enough to teach them in writing
Separate key control from key management and give a concrete example of each failing in a real facility type
Your checkpoint
A documented 12-change-key master key system with pinning charts, cross-checked line by line against MACS rules and signed off as error-free
Master Keying and Key Control Systems
Design a tiered key-control policy covering issuance authority, signature levels, record retention, and loss response
Evaluate restricted keyway and patented-keyway options against cost, patent life, and replacement risk
Apply construction keying and removable-core strategies to a phased renovation scenario
Assess how a compromised cylinder can be decoded and what countermeasures reduce that exposure
Your checkpoint
A mock key-control audit report for a 200-door facility with at least six findings, each tied to a specific remediation and cost estimate
Electrified Hardware, Access Control, and Life-Safety Interface
Classify each electrified locking device as fail safe or fail secure and justify the choice by occupancy and egress path
Calculate a power supply load for a mixed device list and size the supply with adequate headroom for inrush
Distinguish request-to-exit devices, door position switches, and delayed egress controls by function and wiring
Compare credential technologies and reader-to-controller protocols and state the practical limits of each
Your checkpoint
An electrified door schedule for eight openings listing device, fail state, voltage and current draw, power source, and the egress method used at each opening
Electrified Hardware, Access Control, and Life-Safety Interface & Codes, Standards, Specifications, and Facility Security Administration
Map the life-safety criteria for access-controlled egress doors to the specific devices that satisfy each criterion
Resolve three realistic conflicts where access control, fire rating, and egress requirements collide, and document the reasoning
Apply fire-door rules on labeling, clearances, and panic hardware to electrified openings
Explain how loss of power, loss of network, and loss of the controller differ in their effect on each opening
Your checkpoint
A compliance checklist applied to the eight-openings schedule, with a short written narrative defending each fail-state and egress decision against the applicable code criteria
Codes, Standards, Specifications, and Facility Security Administration
Sequence the governing documents (life-safety code, fire-door standard, accessibility standard, hardware standards, manufacturer listings) and state which wins when they conflict
Apply accessibility limits on operable force, reach range, and hardware operability to door-by-door selections
Write specification language for one opening covering hardware set, execution, submittals, and closeout requirements
Identify the submittal, substitution, and RFI steps that most often derail hardware on a project
Your checkpoint
A complete three-part specification section for a single opening plus a submittal review checklist that another person could apply without asking you questions
Codes, Standards, Specifications, and Facility Security Administration & Institutional Door Hardware and Locking Devices & Master Keying and Key Control Systems & Electrified Hardware, Access Control, and Life-Safety Interface
Conduct a structured security survey of a building type you know, covering perimeter, keying, access control, and record keeping
Convert survey observations into ranked recommendations with rough cost and risk-reduction rationale
Retake every weak-area quiz from weeks 1 through 7 and rewrite the missed concepts in your own words
Sit a full-length mixed practice exam under timed conditions and analyze errors by domain
Your checkpoint
A two-page security survey report with ranked recommendations plus a 100-question timed practice exam scored at 80% or higher, with a written error analysis of every missed item
Milestones
Week 2: Closed-book, 30-question hardware identification and application quiz scored at 85% or better; the 10-door hardware schedule is complete and internally consistent
Week 4: Closed-book, 40-question mixed exam on institutional hardware and master keying scored at 85% or better, and the 12-change-key pinning chart passes a self-audit against MACS with zero violations
Week 6: The eight-opening electrified schedule survives a self-review against life-safety egress criteria with no unexplained fail-state or egress gaps
Week 8: Timed 100-question practice exam at 80% or higher with no domain below 75%, plus a finished security survey report