Amazon DSP study materials
Amazon DSP study resources

The Deal That Never Delivers

Amazon DSP · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Deal That Never Delivers

A beverage brand books a private marketplace (PMP) deal with a premium publisher at a $9.00 CPM floor and a $12.00 fixed bid, expecting premium sports content inventory. Two weeks in, the deal has delivered only 8% of its forecasted impressions. The line item's bid is above the floor, the deal is active, and the publisher confirms the deal ID is live. Meanwhile, an open-auction line item in the same campaign is delivering in full at a $4.50 average CPM. The brand's category is alcohol-adjacent, and the publisher's inventory includes some content flagged as sensitive. The trader proposes lowering the fixed bid to $7.00 to 'make the deal more competitive.'

1. Evaluate the trader's proposal to lower the bid below the floor, and identify the more likely causes of underdelivery.

Read the worked answer

Lowering the fixed bid to $7.00 is below the $9.00 floor, so the deal would simply stop bidding-it cannot win inventory priced under its floor, and a bid below the floor guarantees no delivery. The proposal misdiagnoses the problem. More likely causes of PMP underdelivery include:

  • Inventory scarcity in the targeted content: premium sports inventory may be limited during the flight, so the forecast was optimistic.
  • Deal-level targeting restrictions: if the line item layers narrow audience or content targeting on top of the deal, the intersection may be tiny.
  • Category/ad policy filtering: alcohol-adjacent creative may be excluded from sensitive or certain premium content, shrinking eligible supply.
  • Deal type mismatch: a fixed deal requires the buyer to accept the publisher's terms; if the publisher prioritizes other deals, delivery lags. The fix is to inspect eligible supply and targeting intersections, not to cut the bid.

2. Recommend concrete steps to improve delivery while preserving the premium-inventory objective.

Read the worked answer

Steps:

  1. Audit the targeting intersection. Temporarily loosen layered audience or content targeting on the deal line item to confirm whether the restriction is the bottleneck; measure delivery change.
  2. Confirm category eligibility with the publisher. Ask which content categories exclude alcohol-adjacent creative and whether brand-safety settings are filtering supply. Adjust exclusions to the minimum required rather than blanket-blocking sensitive categories.
  3. Review the deal forecast with the publisher and renegotiate volume expectations or extend the flight if inventory is genuinely scarce.
  4. Keep the bid at or above the floor ($12.00 fixed is fine); the floor is a price constraint, not a competitiveness lever. If the deal is a fixed type, the bid is not the variable-delivery depends on publisher allocation.
  5. Use the open-auction line item for reach while the PMP is optimized, so total campaign delivery does not stall. The principle: in PMP deals, underdelivery is usually a supply/targeting/eligibility issue, not a bid issue, and cutting below the floor is self-defeating.