More study resources

About this exam

APM Project Risk Management Level 1 is an introductory professional qualification from the Association for Project Management (APM), aimed at people who need a working command of project risk rather than deep quantitative specialism. It suits project managers, project controllers, engineers, and team members who contribute to risk registers, workshops, and reviews, and it also provides a stepping stone towards the more advanced Level 2 certificate. The syllabus spans the risk management fundamentals and terminology that anchor the discipline; the organisational context, governance, and framework within which risk work happens; identification and stakeholder engagement; qualitative and quantitative analysis and evaluation; response planning and treatment; monitoring, reporting, and communication; opportunity management across the lifecycle; and risk maturity, culture, and continuous improvement. Assessment is by multiple-choice examination, and the APM publishes the current format, duration, sitting arrangements, fees, and results policy on its own website, so check there before booking. Preparation typically combines the APM's published body of knowledge with structured practice: learn the vocabulary precisely, because many questions turn on distinguishing terms such as risk appetite, tolerance, and exposure; then work through scenarios that ask you to select the most appropriate response or analysis technique. Building a habit of applying each concept to a real project you know is the most reliable way to make the material stick.

What you'll study

Common questions

About APM Project Risk Management Level 1 preparation

What is the exam format?

It is a multiple-choice examination. The APM sets and periodically revises the exact number of questions, the time allowed, and whether it is delivered on paper or by computer, so confirm the current specification on the APM website rather than relying on second-hand accounts.

How difficult is Level 1?

It is an entry-level qualification, so the difficulty lies in precision rather than mathematics. Candidates who have read the syllabus once often underestimate how carefully terms are defined. Expect questions that require you to choose between closely related concepts, and prepare by testing yourself on definitions rather than by re-reading.

Do I need project experience to pass?

No formal experience is required. However, candidates with some exposure to a live project find the scenario-style questions far easier, because they can picture a risk register, a workshop, or a review meeting. If you have none, anchor each topic to a project you know personally, even a voluntary or domestic one.

How long should I spend preparing?

Most candidates need a few weeks of focused study rather than months. A sensible pattern is to read a section of the syllabus, write your own summary in your own words, then answer practice questions on that section before moving on. Spacing the sessions over several weeks beats cramming the whole syllabus in a weekend.

What is the best study order?

Start with fundamentals and terminology, since every later topic uses that vocabulary. Move to context and framework, then identification, analysis, and response, which form the core workflow. Finish with monitoring and reporting, opportunity management, and maturity and culture, which draw on everything before them.

Can I retake the exam if I fail?

Retake arrangements, waiting periods, and any additional fees are set by the APM and can change. Check the current policy on the APM website or with your accredited training provider before you book, and treat any figure you hear informally as unverified.

Where do I sit the exam?

Sittings are arranged through the APM and its accredited providers, and options vary by region and between open and in-house sessions. The APM website lists current booking routes and venues, which is the only reliable place to confirm availability for your location and preferred date.

What are the most common failure modes?

Three recur: confusing risk appetite with risk tolerance, muddling qualitative scoring with quantitative techniques such as Monte Carlo simulation, and choosing a response that treats a symptom rather than the cause. A fourth is simply misreading a question that asks for the least appropriate option rather than the most appropriate.

How does Level 1 differ from Level 2?

Level 1 covers the principles, vocabulary, and standard process steps, and is intended to give you a solid working foundation. Level 2 goes deeper into applying techniques and analysing risk in more complex situations. Most candidates take Level 1 first and build experience before attempting Level 2.