Choosing Between Two Past Tenses in a Narrative
You are drafting a narrative in Portuguese for the Personal and Imaginative Writing section. The scene: a narrator returns to the town in Portugal where they spent childhood summers. The draft contains the following sentences, which your teacher has flagged as problematic: (1) Quando cheguei à praça, o sol brilhava e as pessoas falavam alto. (2) A minha avó fazia o jantar todas as noites naquela casa. (3) Naquele verão, eu ia à praia todos os dias. Your teacher says the sentences are not wrong in isolation but that the choices need to be justified by what the narrator is doing at each moment in the narrative. She asks you to revise the passage so the tense choices are deliberate, and to explain your reasoning.
1. Explain the difference between the pretérito perfeito and the pretérito imperfeito as they function in this narrative, and assess whether each of the three sentences uses the right tense.
Read the worked answer
The pretérito perfeito presents an event as completed and bounded - it moves the story forward. The pretérito imperfeito presents a state, a habit, or background circumstance with no defined boundary - it holds the scene still. In sentence (1), cheguei is correctly perfect: arriving is a single completed event that advances the narrative. Brilhava and falavam are imperfect and correct as background description - the sun was shining, people were talking - setting the scene around the arrival. That sentence works. Sentence (2) is more interesting. Fazia o jantar todas as noites is habitual, so the imperfect is defensible - it describes a repeated practice. But if the narrator is recalling one specific evening that matters to the story, the perfect (fez) would foreground that occasion. The choice depends on narrative purpose, which is exactly the teacher's point: habitual background takes imperfect, a specific remembered occasion takes perfect. Sentence (3) is the clearest case. Ia à praia todos os dias is explicitly habitual over a bounded period (naquele verão), so the imperfect is correct - but the bounded frame naquele verão is doing the limiting work, not the verb. If the narrator wanted to present one particular day as an event, it would be fui à praia naquele dia. The revision should therefore keep (1) as written, keep (3) as written but be conscious of why, and make (2) a deliberate choice: imperfect if the grandmother's cooking is atmosphere, perfect if it is a scene the narrator is reliving.
2. Rewrite sentence (2) in two different ways, one using the imperfect and one using the perfect, and explain how each version changes the reader's experience.
Read the worked answer
Imperfect version: A minha avó fazia o jantar todas as noites naquela casa. This presents the grandmother's cooking as enduring background - a rhythm of the household that the narrator is describing from a distance. The reader experiences it as atmosphere, part of what the house was like, not as a single moment. It supports a reflective, nostalgic tone and works well if the surrounding passage is describing the texture of those summers. Perfect version: Naquela noite, a minha avó fez o jantar e chamou-nos à mesa. This presents one specific evening as an event. The reader is placed inside a scene with a before and after; the cooking becomes an action that moves the narrative. It suits a passage where something happens at that dinner - a conversation, a revelation, a farewell. The judgement call is not grammatical but structural: the imperfect keeps the reader at a reflective distance, the perfect pulls them into a moment. A strong narrative often uses both in sequence - imperfect to establish the household, perfect to break into one night that matters. The error to avoid is mixing them without purpose, which produces a passage that feels either flat (all imperfect, no events) or breathless (all perfect, no atmosphere).