Writing an opinion piece under a word limit
You must write a short opinion piece in Hebrew for the school newsletter, 180-220 words, on whether school should start an hour later for senior students. You have strong evidence about sleep and adolescents, but the newsletter editor has told you the audience includes teachers and parents who are sceptical, and that last term a similar piece was rejected for being one-sided and for exceeding the word limit. You have 40 minutes in class and a dictionary that is slow to use. You tend to write long introductions.
1. Plan the structure of the piece and state how you will allocate the word budget.
Read the worked answer
A defensible plan for 180-220 words in Hebrew:
- Opening, about 25-30 words: a concrete scene or a direct claim, not background. For example, describing a 17-year-old falling asleep in first period. Skip general statements about the importance of education.
- Concession, about 35-40 words: state the strongest sceptical objection fairly, such as transport schedules, parents' work hours, or lost afternoon time. Naming it credibly is what stops the piece reading as one-sided.
- Argument, about 70-80 words: two points maximum, each with one piece of support. Better two developed points than four skimmed ones.
- Counter to the concession, about 25-30 words: show why the objection is manageable, for example a staggered timetable for seniors only.
- Close, about 20-25 words: a concrete proposal or a question, not a summary of what you already said.
Budget notes: a long introduction is the main risk. Cap it. Reserve about 10 words of slack so you can trim at the end rather than run over. In the last five minutes, count and cut adjectives rather than whole arguments, because cutting an argument loses marks for content while cutting adjectives does not.
2. Give two Hebrew phrasing strategies that raise the register for a sceptical adult audience without making the piece sound like a formal essay, and explain why each works.
Read the worked answer
Two strategies, with reasons:
- Concede with a concessive connector, then pivot. Use a construction such as "נכון ש... אבל..." or "אמנם... עם זאת...". This signals that you have heard the objection before you answer it, which is exactly what sceptical adult readers look for. It works because the concession is grammatical rather than decorative: the sentence cannot proceed without acknowledging the other side, so the piece cannot drift into one-sidedness.
- Replace abstract nouns with a concrete subject and verb. Instead of a nominal phrase about "the importance of the change", write who does what: "התלמידים יגיעו ערים לשיעור הראשון". Hebrew opinion writing tolerates fairly direct first-person argument, and concrete subjects read as credible rather than preachy. It also saves words, which matters under a tight limit.
A third acceptable strategy is rhetorical questions used sparingly, one at most, to frame the objection. Overuse reads as a speech, not a newsletter piece, and costs words without adding argument.