SACE Stage 2 Korean cheat sheet
SACE Stage 2 Korean · Keep the key ideas within reach.
Interacting in Korean
Speech-level selection: 해요체 (-아/어요) is the default informal polite style for everyday conversation with strangers, acquaintances, and service staff; 합니다체 (-ㅂ니다/습니다) suits presentations, announcements, and formal service encounters; 반말 is limited to close peers or younger people when the relationship permits.
Subject honorification: when the subject is respected, add -(으)시- to the verb or adjective stem and use 께서 instead of 이/가, as in 선생님께서 오셨어요; 드리다 replaces 주다 when the recipient is respected.
Addressee honorifics and subject honorifics are separate systems: -(으)시- honors the subject, while endings such as -아/어요 and -ㅂ니다 honor the listener; one sentence can contain both.
Turn-taking cues: backchannels such as 네, 아, 그렇군요, and 정말요 signal attention; clarification phrases such as 다시 말씀해 주시겠어요? and 무슨 뜻이에요? are used when the message is unclear.
Request softening: -아/어 주시겠어요? is more polite than -아/어 주세요; -ㄹ/을 수 있을까요? is an indirect request that leaves room for refusal; a refusal commonly follows 죄송하지만 + reason + alternative.
Formulaic oral openings and closings include 처음 뵙겠습니다, 잘 부탁드립니다, 오늘 말씀 잘 들었습니다, and 수고하셨습니다; these set the relationship and frame the interaction.
Pronunciation in interaction: final consonants are unreleased before a pause; a final consonant moves to a following vowel-initial particle or suffix in liaison, as in 한국어 [한구거]; ㅎ may weaken, aspirate, or delete depending on context.
Repair strategy: self-repair uses 다시 말하면 or 제 말은 ...; confirmation uses ...라는 말씀이죠?; repeating the key phrase back to the speaker checks understanding without guessing.
Register-shift decision: choose speech level by age, status, setting, purpose, and the interlocutor’s previous turn; mirror the other speaker’s formality where appropriate but do not over-honorify yourself.
Understanding and Responding to Spoken and Written Korean Texts
Text-type cues: diary writing often uses -았/었/였다 and informal endings; news reports use -ㅂ니다/습니다 and third-person reference; advertisements use imperatives and -(으)세요; notices use -(으)ㅂ니다 and -기 바랍니다.
Topic versus subject: 은/는 marks topic or contrast and often signals old or contrasted information; 이/가 marks the grammatical subject or new/focused information, so the choice changes emphasis.
Connector logic: 그러나/하지만 signal contrast; 따라서/그래서 signal result; 또한/게다가 signal addition; 예를 들어 introduces an example; 반면에 signals a contrasting parallel; 즉 signals rephrasing.
Tense and aspect: -고 있다 is progressive; -아/어 있다 often describes a resulting state; -더라 marks recalled observation; -겠- can mark supposition or intention; -시- is honorific, not tense.
Reported speech: statements use -다고 하다 or -(이)라고 하다; questions use -냐고 하다; suggestions use -자고 하다; informal contractions include -대요, -래요, -냬요, and -재요.
Listening discrimination: contrast ㅓ/ㅗ, ㅡ/ㅜ, ㄱ/ㄲ, ㅅ/ㅆ, and final consonants; use collocations and sentence context when individual sounds are ambiguous.
Relationship inference: -(으)시- and 께서 suggest a respected subject; 반말 endings suggest closeness or a superior-to-lower relationship; address terms and titles also indicate relative status.
Written cohesion: track pronoun substitution (그, 그녀, 이것, 그것), ellipsis, and conjunctive adverbs across clauses; identify who does what before summarizing the paragraph.
Response construction: paraphrase the main claim in your own Korean, add one supporting detail from the text, and state agreement or disagreement with evidence rather than copying the original sentence.
Creating Texts in Korean
Paragraph structure: a topic sentence states the claim; supporting sentences give evidence or examples; a concluding sentence links back to the claim; academic essays often follow 서론-본론-결론.
Genre-ending match: reports and essays use -ㅂ니다/습니다 or -다; diaries and personal letters use -아/어요 or 반말; formal letters and emails use -ㅂ니다 with fixed openings and closings.
Cohesion: use 그리고, 그러나, 따라서, 또한, and 예를 들어 to show relationships; replace repeated nouns with pronouns or ellipsis; keep one logical relation per connector.
Honorific consistency: do not mix 반말 and 합니다체 in one formal text; use -(으)시- with 께서 for a respected subject; use humble 드리다 and 뵙다 for the writer’s actions toward a superior.
Spacing rule: particles attach to the preceding word; independent words and auxiliary verb forms are generally spaced, as in 도와 주세요 and 학교에 갑니다; dependent nouns are spaced from modifiers.
Punctuation and numbers: Korean uses ., ,, ?, and ! like English; quotations use “ ” or ‘ ’; Arabic numerals are usual for dates and amounts; Sino-Korean and native Korean unit nouns must match the numeral type.
Voice choice: passive suffixes -이/히/리/기 form verbs such as 보이다, 닫히다, 들리다, and 열리다; -게 하다 is causative; -아/어지다 expresses change; vary voice to keep the subject consistent.
Formal email frame: open with 안녕하십니까?; develop the body in -ㅂ니다; close with 감사합니다 or 이상입니다 plus 드림; address the recipient by title and name rather than using 반말.
Editing checklist: verify speech-level consistency, subject honorific agreement, tense consistency, connector logic, spelling and spacing, and whether each paragraph has a clear topic sentence.
In-depth Study and Investigation of Korean Language and Culture
Researchable question: a strong question names a population, text or artifact, time period, and a clear language or culture claim; broad topics such as “Korean food” are too wide for an in-depth investigation.
Source triangulation: combine at least two independent source types, such as interviews, surveys, news articles, or linguistic examples; a claim supported only by one source type remains provisional.
Research ethics: participants need clear information about purpose, procedures, data use, anonymity, and the right to withdraw; consent must be voluntary and documented, and Korean-language consent materials should be plain and accurate.
Culture concepts: 눈치 is social awareness of unspoken cues; 정 is emotional attachment and solidarity; 빨리빨리 values speed; 한 is deep sorrow or resentment; 체면 is social face; define each in context and avoid stereotyping.
Language-culture link: honorifics index age and status; kinship terms extend to non-relatives; address terms depend on relationship and setting; these patterns show how grammar and social meaning interact.
Data analysis: code recurring themes, distinguish emic insider categories from etic outsider categories, and quote original Korean with translation so the interpretation can be checked.
Background facts: Hangul was promulgated in 1446 under King Sejong; South Korean standard language is based on Seoul speech; North Korean standard differs; Chinese and English loanwords are widespread but stylistically variable.
Presentation of findings: state method, evidence, interpretation, and limitations; cite Korean sources with author, title, year, and URL or access date; separate description from evaluation.
Qualified claims: use qualifiers such as 많은, 일부, and 경향이 있다; distinguish prescriptive norms from observed usage; do not present one example as representative of all Korean behavior.